Softwr

Cybersecurity · head to head

Jumio vs Shufti Pro

Jumio logo

Jumio

Cybersecurity

Document-based identity verification for regulated onboarding

From
On request
Rated
-
Shufti Pro logo

Shufti Pro

Cybersecurity

Identity verification and AML screening at the low cost end of the market

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Jumio no pricing is published at any tier, so a buyer cannot size the cost without entering a sales process, and benchmarking requires a competitive bid from a vendor that does publish.; Shufti Pro rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
  • They diverge on capability: Jumio covers Liveness detection, Shufti Pro covers Facial biometrics.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Jumio and Shufti Pro actually diverge.

Attributes where Jumio and Shufti Pro differ
AttributeJumioShufti Pro

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Jumio

  • Liveness detection
  • Identity orchestration
  • Risk signals
  • Data residency options
  • Case review console

Only in Shufti Pro

  • Facial biometrics
  • KYB verification
  • Address verification
  • Age verification
  • Pay as you go option

Both cover

  • Document verification
  • AML screening

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Jumio

  • A bank that needs iBeta certified liveness evidence to satisfy an internal control requirementnot Shufti Pro
  • A gambling operator required to verify age and identity across multiple regulated European marketsnot Shufti Pro
  • An organisation with an EU data residency mandate that cannot send biometric data to US processingnot Shufti Pro
  • A marketplace needing one vendor contract covering document checks, screening and ongoing monitoring rather than threenot Shufti Pro

Shufti Pro

  • A crypto exchange onboarding users in markets where premium vendors have poor document coveragenot Jumio
  • A gambling operator needing age assurance at high volume where per-check cost dominates the unit economicsnot Jumio
  • A gig economy platform verifying couriers whose documents are photographed on low end phonesnot Jumio
  • A startup that needs verification without signing an annual volume commitment before it knows its volumenot Jumio

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Jumio

  • No pricing is published at any tier, so a buyer cannot size the cost without entering a sales process, and benchmarking requires a competitive bid from a vendor that does publish.
  • Contracts are structured on annual committed volume, meaning a business whose growth stalls pays for verifications it never consumed and there is usually no rollover.
  • AML screening is licensed separately from identity verification, so the quote that wins on document price can be materially more expensive once screening and monitoring are added.
  • Pass rates degrade for lower quality documents and older smartphones, and the resulting manual review queue is a staffing cost that does not appear in the vendor quote.
  • As an established vendor with a large enterprise base, product changes move at enterprise pace, and buyers wanting rapid iteration on new fraud vectors often find newer entrants ship faster.

Shufti Pro

  • Rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
  • Accuracy on difficult document types trails the premium vendors, and the saving per check is often consumed by the manual review headcount handling the additional referrals.
  • The enterprise assurance profile is thinner than that of larger competitors, so regulated bank procurement teams frequently rule it out at the vendor risk stage rather than on capability.
  • Support responsiveness scales with contract size, and pay as you go customers have limited recourse when a document type suddenly starts failing in one market.
  • Country coverage is broad but uneven in depth, meaning the same product can perform very differently across two markets you are launching in simultaneously.

Pricing, plan by plan

Jumio

On request
  • Jumio Platform$undefined/year
    • Priced per verification with annual volume commitment
    • Overage rates apply above committed volume
    • AML screening priced separately from document checks

Shufti Pro

On request
  • Pay as you go$undefined/month
    • Consumption billing with no annual commitment
    • Rate quoted by sales, not published
    • Resubmission sessions stated as not billable
  • Monthly commitment$undefined/month
    • Lower per-verification rate against a volume commitment
    • AML screening and KYB priced as add-ons
    • Free trial available before contracting

Which should you pick?

Choose Jumio if

  • You need liveness detection.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want identity orchestration.

Choose Shufti Pro if

  • You need facial biometrics.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want kyb verification.

Questions people ask

Is Jumio or Shufti Pro better?
Neither clearly leads. Jumio starts at On request and Shufti Pro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Jumio or Shufti Pro?
Jumio starts at On request and Shufti Pro at On request.
Does Jumio or Shufti Pro run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Jumio best used for?
Jumio is most often used for a bank that needs ibeta certified liveness evidence to satisfy an internal control requirement, a gambling operator required to verify age and identity across multiple regulated european markets, an organisation with an eu data residency mandate that cannot send biometric data to us processing, a marketplace needing one vendor contract covering document checks, screening and ongoing monitoring rather than three. Of those, a bank that needs ibeta certified liveness evidence to satisfy an internal control requirement and a gambling operator required to verify age and identity across multiple regulated european markets are not what Shufti Pro is typically brought in for.
What can Jumio do that Shufti Pro cannot?
Jumio covers Liveness detection, Identity orchestration, Risk signals, Data residency options. Shufti Pro covers Facial biometrics, KYB verification, Address verification, Age verification. Both handle Document verification, AML screening.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Jumio: Does Jumio publish prices?

No. Everything is quoted, normally as a per-verification rate against an annual committed volume with overage pricing above it.

Shufti Pro: Are failed attempts charged?

Shufti states that resubmission sessions are not charged and that billing follows successful verification attempts. Get that written into the contract, because it materially changes total cost.

Jumio: Is biometric data processed in the EU?

Regional processing including EU data residency is offered. Confirm the specific region and retention period in the contract rather than assuming it.

Shufti Pro: Is there a published price?

No. Plan structures are published but rates are quoted. Third party estimates put effective cost well below premium vendors.

Jumio: Is AML screening included?

Not by default. Screening and ongoing monitoring are priced separately from document verification.

Shufti Pro: Can we start without a commitment?

Yes. A pay as you go option exists, which is unusual in this category and useful for early stage volume.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads