Marketing · head to head
Matomo vs Snowplow

Snowplow
Business Intelligence
Behavioural data pipeline you run in your own cloud, relicensed away from Apache 2.0 in 2024
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Matomo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Matomo the self hosted Community Edition is free but excludes A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, cohorts, crash analytics and multi channel attribution, all of which are paid plugins; Snowplow the core pipeline was relicensed from Apache 2.0 on 8 January 2024 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement and a Confluent-derived community licence, so organisations that adopted it as permissively licensed software must now review their entitlement, buy a licence, or migrate.
- They diverge on capability: Matomo covers Web analytics, Snowplow covers Own-cloud deployment.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Matomo and Snowplow actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Matomo
- Web analytics
- Real-time reports
- Custom dimensions
- Goal tracking
- E-commerce tracking
- Google Search Console
- Privacy-focused
- Cloud deployment
Only in Snowplow
- Own-cloud deployment
- Schema enforcement
- Warehouse loading
- Enrichment
- Trackers
- Streaming output
- Data models
- Snowplow BDP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Matomo
- Privacy focused web analytics as an alternative to Google Analyticsnot Snowplow
- Self hosting analytics so visitor data stays on owned infrastructurenot Snowplow
Snowplow
- A data team that needs full-fidelity event data in its own warehouse to build attribution or machine learning features rather than to populate dashboardsnot Matomo
- A regulated business that cannot send behavioural data to a third-party analytics vendor and must keep collection inside its own cloud accountnot Matomo
- A product organisation tired of silently malformed events, which wants a schema contract enforced at collection timenot Matomo
- A company modelling customer behaviour across web, mobile and server events that needs them in one consistent structurenot Matomo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Matomo
- The self hosted Community Edition is free but excludes A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, cohorts, crash analytics and multi channel attribution, all of which are paid plugins
- Premium plugin bundles for self hosted installs run from 275 EUR a month for 4 users to 3,400 EUR for 50
- Cloud pricing is banded by monthly hits, and anything above 10 million requires contacting sales
- Self hosting places all operation and upgrades on the operator while still needing paid plugins for the advanced features
Snowplow
- The core pipeline was relicensed from Apache 2.0 on 8 January 2024 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement and a Confluent-derived community licence, so organisations that adopted it as permissively licensed software must now review their entitlement, buy a licence, or migrate.
- You run the pipeline in your own cloud, which means the infrastructure bill, the on-call rota and the upgrade work are yours, and at high event volume that operational cost frequently exceeds what a hosted product would have charged.
- Schema enforcement is the main benefit and the main friction, because every new event requires a schema to be authored and versioned, and teams without discipline around that end up blocked on their own governance process.
- There is no analysis layer: Snowplow delivers data to your warehouse and nothing else, so you still need modelling, a BI tool and the people to run them before anyone sees a number.
- The licence change fractured the community, spawning an Apache 2.0 fork, which means community contributions and third-party tooling are now split across two codebases with uncertain long-term maintenance.
Pricing, plan by plan
Matomo
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Open-source
- Full analytics
- Privacy-focused
Snowplow
On request- Snowplow BDP$undefined/year
- Commercial pricing quoted by event volume and deployment
- Core pipeline components under the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement, not Apache 2.0
- Trackers, analytics SDKs and Iglu SDKs remain Apache 2.0
Which should you pick?
Choose Matomo if
- You need web analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, On-premise.
- You also want real-time reports.
Choose Snowplow if
- You need own-cloud deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web, Docker.
- You also want schema enforcement.
Questions people ask
- Is Matomo or Snowplow better?
- Neither clearly leads. Matomo starts at Free and Snowplow at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Matomo or Snowplow?
- Matomo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Matomo and On request for Snowplow.
- Does Matomo or Snowplow run on more platforms?
- Matomo runs on Web, On-premise. Snowplow runs on Linux, Web, Docker.
- Can I use Matomo for free?
- Yes. Matomo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Snowplow starts at On request.
- What is Matomo best used for?
- Matomo is most often used for privacy focused web analytics as an alternative to google analytics, self hosting analytics so visitor data stays on owned infrastructure. Of those, privacy focused web analytics as an alternative to google analytics and self hosting analytics so visitor data stays on owned infrastructure are not what Snowplow is typically brought in for.
- What can Matomo do that Snowplow cannot?
- Matomo covers Web analytics, Real-time reports, Custom dimensions, Goal tracking. Snowplow covers Own-cloud deployment, Schema enforcement, Warehouse loading, Enrichment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Matomo: How much does Matomo cost?
Matomo Cloud starts at EUR 29 per month for the Starter plan, which covers 50,000 hits per month. Matomo On-Premise has a free Community edition, with paid bundles from EUR 275 per month for up to 5M hits and 4 users.
SourceSnowplow: Is Snowplow still open source?
Not in the permissive sense. On 8 January 2024 the core pipeline moved from Apache 2.0 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement, with version 1.1 following in December 2024, alongside a community licence based on the Confluent Community Licence. Trackers and analytics SDKs remain Apache 2.0.
Matomo: Is Matomo free?
The On-Premise Community edition is free forever with unlimited users and hits, supported through the forum only. Matomo Cloud is a paid service, though a free trial with access to all core features is offered.
SourceSnowplow: Can we still run it for free in production?
Free use of the relicensed core components is materially constrained and commercial use generally requires an agreement. Read the current licence text against your intended use rather than relying on older documentation.
Matomo: What is the difference between Matomo Cloud and On-Premise?
Cloud plans include hosting, maintenance, automatic updates and daily backups, priced by monthly hits from EUR 29. On-Premise is self-hosted, free in its Community edition, with paid bundles adding support and higher user counts.
SourceSnowplow: Is there an Apache 2.0 alternative?
Yes, a fork called OpenSnowcat was created in response to the relicensing and continues under Apache 2.0.
Matomo: How many hits do the Matomo On-Premise bundles cover?
The Team bundle covers up to 5M hits per month and 4 users at EUR 275 per month. Business covers up to 30M hits and 20 users at EUR 1,450. Enterprise covers up to 100M hits and 50 users at EUR 3,400.
SourceSnowplow: What does Snowplow BDP cost?
Not published. It is quoted by event volume and deployment, and your own cloud infrastructure costs are separate and additional.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Matomo vs Umami
- Matomo vs Crazy Egg
- Matomo vs Ruler Analytics
- Matomo vs VWO
- Matomo vs Northbeam
- Matomo vs Countly
- Matomo vs Fathom Analytics
- Matomo vs Mautic
- Matomo vs Attribution
- Matomo vs Plausible
- Matomo vs Freshpaint
- Matomo vs Simple Analytics
- Matomo vs Mailgun
- Matomo vs Triple Whale
- Matomo vs Adobe Analytics
- Matomo vs Adverity
- Matomo vs Bloomreach
- Matomo vs CallRail
- Matomo vs Anaplan
- Matomo vs Pigment
- Matomo vs DashThis
- Matomo vs Hebbia
- Matomo vs Logi Analytics
- Matomo vs Luzmo
- Matomo vs Preset
- Matomo vs ProfitWell
- Matomo vs Power BI
- Matomo vs Sisense
- Matomo vs Amazon QuickSight
- Matomo vs MicroStrategy
- Matomo vs Yellowfin
- Matomo vs Zebra BI
- Matomo vs Zenlytic
- Matomo vs ThoughtSpot
- Matomo vs Cube
- Snowplow vs Umami
- Snowplow vs Crazy Egg
- Snowplow vs Ruler Analytics
- Snowplow vs VWO
- Snowplow vs Northbeam
- Snowplow vs Countly
- Snowplow vs Fathom Analytics
- Snowplow vs Mautic
- Snowplow vs Attribution
- Snowplow vs Plausible
- Snowplow vs Freshpaint
- Snowplow vs Simple Analytics
- Snowplow vs Mailgun
- Snowplow vs Triple Whale
- Snowplow vs Adobe Analytics
- Snowplow vs Adverity
- Snowplow vs Bloomreach
- Snowplow vs CallRail
- Snowplow vs Anaplan
- Snowplow vs Pigment
- Snowplow vs DashThis
- Snowplow vs Hebbia
- Snowplow vs Logi Analytics
- Snowplow vs Luzmo
- Snowplow vs Preset
- Snowplow vs ProfitWell
- Snowplow vs Power BI
- Snowplow vs Sisense
- Snowplow vs Amazon QuickSight
- Snowplow vs MicroStrategy
- Snowplow vs Yellowfin
- Snowplow vs Zebra BI
- Snowplow vs Zenlytic
- Snowplow vs ThoughtSpot
- Snowplow vs Cube

