Nonprofits · head to head
Fluxx vs Keela

Fluxx
Nonprofits
Configurable grants management for foundations that run complex, multi-stage funding programmes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Keela
Nonprofits
Nonprofit CRM and fundraising platform with Canadian tax receipting built in
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fluxx configuration flexibility means the system does very little until someone configures it, and foundations without a dedicated systems administrator end up paying the vendor or a partner for every change.; Keela pricing scales with contact count, so a charity that keeps twenty years of lapsed donors pays every month for records it never contacts, and the only fix is deleting history it may need for reporting.
- They diverge on capability: Fluxx covers Configurable data model, Keela covers Donor records and segmentation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fluxx and Keela actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fluxx
- Configurable data model
- Card-based interface
- Multi-programme workflows
- Board and committee review
- Payment scheduling
- Applicant portal
Only in Keela
- Donor records and segmentation
- CRA and IRS receipting
- Donation forms and pages
- Email and automation
- Grant and pledge tracking
- Reporting dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fluxx
- A foundation running six distinct funding programmes that each need their own application form, review panel and payment schedulenot Keela
- A regranting intermediary administering funds for multiple donors who each require separate reportingnot Keela
- A public agency distributing grant funds with statutory eligibility rules that must be enforced before an application can be submittednot Keela
- A funder moving off spreadsheets and email after grant volume made manual board packet preparation unworkablenot Keela
Keela
- A Canadian registered charity that must issue CRA compliant receipts without building templates itselfnot Fluxx
- A development team of two to five people replacing spreadsheets and a mailing toolnot Fluxx
- An organisation already running Aplos fund accounting that wants gifts to post through automaticallynot Fluxx
- A bilingual charity sending French and English donor communications from one contact listnot Fluxx
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fluxx
- Configuration flexibility means the system does very little until someone configures it, and foundations without a dedicated systems administrator end up paying the vendor or a partner for every change.
- Implementation commonly runs four to eight months and is priced separately from the subscription, so first-year cost is far above the annual licence figure.
- No pricing is published and quotes scale with assets under management, which means two foundations making the same number of grants can be quoted very differently.
- The card-based interface is unfamiliar to new users and reviewer adoption suffers without training, which matters because trustees use it a few times a year and forget between meetings.
- Reporting is capable but the report builder is technical, and many foundations end up exporting to a spreadsheet or a BI tool for board-ready output.
Keela
- Pricing scales with contact count, so a charity that keeps twenty years of lapsed donors pays every month for records it never contacts, and the only fix is deleting history it may need for reporting.
- The email marketing tools are adequate for donor appeals but weaker than a dedicated platform, so organisations with heavy newsletter programmes end up paying for a second tool and syncing lists.
- Custom reporting is limited to the fields and filters Keela exposes, so questions the product did not anticipate require exporting to a spreadsheet.
- The integration list is short next to Salesforce or Blackbaud, so a charity running an unusual event, membership or advocacy tool will be moving data by CSV.
- Since the 2023 Aplos acquisition the roadmap serves a combined accounting and fundraising suite, so investment favours the accounting join rather than standalone CRM depth.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fluxx
On request- Fluxx Grantmaker$undefined/year
- Configurable grantmaking workflows
- Applicant portal and reviewer access
- Priced by assets under management and grant volume
- Fluxx Grantseeker$undefined/year
- Free portal for applicants submitting to Fluxx funders
- Tracks submissions and requirements across funders
Keela
On request- Keela$undefined/month
- Published tiers priced by number of contacts held, not by user seat
- Higher tiers unlock automation, custom fields and additional reporting
- Card processing is charged separately by the payment processor
Which should you pick?
Choose Keela if
- You need donor records and segmentation.
- You also want cra and irs receipting.
Questions people ask
- Is Fluxx or Keela better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fluxx starts at On request and Keela at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fluxx or Keela?
- Fluxx starts at On request and Keela at On request.
- Does Fluxx or Keela run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Fluxx best used for?
- Fluxx is most often used for a foundation running six distinct funding programmes that each need their own application form, review panel and payment schedule, a regranting intermediary administering funds for multiple donors who each require separate reporting, a public agency distributing grant funds with statutory eligibility rules that must be enforced before an application can be submitted, a funder moving off spreadsheets and email after grant volume made manual board packet preparation unworkable. Of those, a foundation running six distinct funding programmes that each need their own application form, review panel and payment schedule and a regranting intermediary administering funds for multiple donors who each require separate reporting are not what Keela is typically brought in for.
- What can Fluxx do that Keela cannot?
- Fluxx covers Configurable data model, Card-based interface, Multi-programme workflows, Board and committee review. Keela covers Donor records and segmentation, CRA and IRS receipting, Donation forms and pages, Email and automation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fluxx: Is Fluxx Grantseeker really free?
Yes, for applicants. It is the submission portal, and funders pay for Grantmaker.
Keela: Does Keela issue CRA compliant tax receipts?
Yes, receipt numbering, required wording and batch issuance are built in, which is the main reason Canadian charities choose it over US products.
Fluxx: How is Fluxx priced?
By quote, scaling with assets under management and grant volume. Implementation is a separate professional services fee.
Keela: Who owns Keela?
Aplos Software, a US fund accounting vendor, acquired it in 2023. Keela is still sold as its own product but shares a roadmap with Aplos.
Fluxx: Can we configure Fluxx ourselves?
Yes, that is the point of it. But it requires a trained internal administrator; foundations that do not appoint one become dependent on paid services.
Keela: Is pricing per user?
No, it is by contact count. Adding staff does not raise the bill, growing the mailing list does.
Fluxx: How long does implementation take?
Typically four to eight months for a multi-programme funder, driven mostly by how long the foundation takes to agree its own process.
Keela: Can it replace a fund accounting system?
No. It records income and pledges but does not do fund accounting, so you still need Aplos, QuickBooks or an equivalent.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fluxx vs GuideStar
- Fluxx vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Fluxx vs Foundant Technologies
- Fluxx vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- Fluxx vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Fluxx vs Submittable
- Fluxx vs Bonterra
- Fluxx vs Aplos
- Fluxx vs OpenGrants
- Fluxx vs Raisely
- Fluxx vs EveryAction
- Fluxx vs QuickBooks for Nonprofits
- Fluxx vs SignUpGenius
- Fluxx vs Sumac
- Fluxx vs TechSoup
- Fluxx vs Tendenci
- Fluxx vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Fluxx vs Little Green Light
- Fluxx vs Virtuous
- Fluxx vs Bloomerang
- Fluxx vs CharityEngine
- Fluxx vs CiviCRM
- Fluxx vs GrantStation
- Fluxx vs Give Lively
- Fluxx vs Kindful
- Fluxx vs Wild Apricot
- Fluxx vs Trello for Nonprofits
- Fluxx vs VolunteerHub
- Fluxx vs Zeffy
- Keela vs GuideStar
- Keela vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Keela vs Foundant Technologies
- Keela vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- Keela vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Keela vs Submittable
- Keela vs Bonterra
- Keela vs Aplos
- Keela vs OpenGrants
- Keela vs Raisely
- Keela vs EveryAction
- Keela vs QuickBooks for Nonprofits
- Keela vs SignUpGenius
- Keela vs Sumac
- Keela vs TechSoup
- Keela vs Tendenci
- Keela vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Keela vs Little Green Light
- Keela vs Virtuous
- Keela vs Bloomerang
- Keela vs CharityEngine
- Keela vs CiviCRM
- Keela vs GrantStation
- Keela vs Give Lively
- Keela vs Kindful
- Keela vs Wild Apricot
- Keela vs Trello for Nonprofits
- Keela vs VolunteerHub
- Keela vs Zeffy
