ERP · head to head
Holded vs Zip

Holded
ERP
Spanish cloud ERP for invoicing, accounting and business management for small companies
- From
- €7.5/month
- Rated
- -

Zip
ERP
Procurement intake and orchestration that sits on top of the systems you already run
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Holded prices exclude VAT; Zip it is a layer on top of systems you already pay for, so the business case rests on adoption and cycle time rather than replacing a licence, and that is harder to defend to a finance director cutting software spend.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Holded and Zip actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Holded
Nothing recorded that Zip does not also cover.
Only in Zip
- Unified intake
- Approval orchestration
- Vendor onboarding
- Contract repository
- ERP write-back
- Renewal management
- Spend visibility
- AI request handling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Holded
- Managing bank reconciliation rules across multiple accountsnot Zip
- Scaling from 250 to unlimited invoices annually as business growsnot Zip
- Processing payroll and absences for teams of 5-50 peoplenot Zip
- Managing stock across multiple warehouses for distributionnot Zip
- Automating tax authority submissions for Spanish SMEsnot Zip
Zip
- A company that owns a source-to-pay suite nobody uses because employees cannot navigate itnot Holded
- An organisation where every software purchase needs security, legal, privacy and finance sign-off and currently does it in email threadsnot Holded
- A finance team that keeps discovering contracts that auto-renewed because nobody owned the renewal datenot Holded
- A business needing an auditable record of who approved a third-party engagement and on what evidencenot Holded
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Holded
- Prices exclude VAT
- Annual limits reset January to December
- Invoice limits cap usage per tier
Zip
- It is a layer on top of systems you already pay for, so the business case rests on adoption and cycle time rather than replacing a licence, and that is harder to defend to a finance director cutting software spend.
- Value depends entirely on integration depth into your specific ERP and ticketing tools, and a shallow connector reduces it to a workflow tool that someone rekeys out of.
- Pricing is not published and is structured around company size and integration scope, so buyers cannot benchmark without peer references.
- If procurement policy itself is unclear, Zip encodes the confusion: the tool routes requests according to rules someone must first write, and organisations without that clarity see slow implementations.
- It does not do sourcing, auctions or spend analysis, so organisations expecting a full procurement capability will still need a suite or specialist tools alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Holded
€7.5/month- Plus$7.5/month
- 250 invoices per year
- 1 connected bank
- Basic$14.5/month
- 1,000 invoices per year
- 5 connected banks
- 2 users plus advisory
- Standard$29.5/month
- 3,000 invoices per year
- Unlimited banks
- 4 users plus advisory
- Advanced$49.5/month
- 10,000 invoices per year
- Unlimited banks
- 7 users plus advisory
Zip
On request- Zip$undefined/year
- Intake and approval orchestration
- Vendor onboarding and diligence workflows
- Integrations with ERP, contract and ticketing systems
Which should you pick?
Choose Holded if
Nothing in the data separates Holded from Zip on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Zip if
- You need unified intake.
- You work on Web, iOS.
- You also want approval orchestration.
Questions people ask
- Is Holded or Zip better?
- Neither clearly leads. Holded starts at €7.5/month and Zip at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Holded or Zip?
- Holded starts at €7.5/month and Zip at On request.
- Does Holded or Zip run on more platforms?
- Holded runs on Web. Zip runs on Web, iOS.
- What is Holded best used for?
- Holded is most often used for managing bank reconciliation rules across multiple accounts, scaling from 250 to unlimited invoices annually as business grows, processing payroll and absences for teams of 5-50 people, managing stock across multiple warehouses for distribution. Of those, managing bank reconciliation rules across multiple accounts and scaling from 250 to unlimited invoices annually as business grows are not what Zip is typically brought in for.
- What can Holded do that Zip cannot?
- Zip covers Unified intake, Approval orchestration, Vendor onboarding, Contract repository.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Holded: Does Holded offer annual billing discounts?
Yes, Holded offers 50% discount for the first 3 months across all plans. Additionally, annual billing provides savings compared to monthly plans.
SourceZip: Is this the buy now pay later company?
No. This is Zip at ziphq.com, a procurement orchestration platform, unrelated to the payments company of the same name.
Holded: What add-ons does Holded offer?
Holded offers optional add-on modules: Inventory (25 EUR/month), Team Pro (1.50 EUR per employee per month), Payroll (5 EUR per employee per month), and POS (25 EUR per store per month).
SourceZip: Does it replace Coupa or Ariba?
No, and that is the point. It sits in front of them, providing the intake and approval experience employees actually use, and writes back into the suite.
Holded: What are the invoice limits per plan?
Invoice limits vary by plan: Plus (250/year), Basic (1,000/year), Standard (3,000/year), Advanced (10,000/year), and Premium (unlimited).
SourceZip: What does it cost?
Not published. Quoted by company size, modules and the integrations you need. Get peer benchmarks before negotiating.
Zip: What is the prerequisite for success?
A written procurement policy. Zip automates the routing rules you give it; if nobody can say who approves what, implementation stalls.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Holded vs DEAR Systems
- Holded vs MRPeasy
- Holded vs Fishbowl
- Holded vs Infor CloudSuite
- Holded vs NetSuite
- Holded vs bexio
- Holded vs Bling
- Holded vs Striven
- Holded vs TallyPrime
- Holded vs Odoo
- Holded vs Jaggaer
- Holded vs Zycus
- Holded vs Global Shop Solutions
- Holded vs Katana MRP
- Holded vs Levelpath
- Holded vs OpenBravo
- Holded vs Infor
- Holded vs Java
- Holded vs Omnea
- Holded vs Ivalua
- Holded vs QAD ERP
- Holded vs SAP S/4HANA
- Holded vs Metasfresh
- Holded vs GEP SMART
- Holded vs Deltek
- Holded vs Axelor
- Holded vs Axonaut
- Holded vs BatchMaster
- Holded vs Blue Link ERP
- Zip vs DEAR Systems
- Zip vs MRPeasy
- Zip vs Fishbowl
- Zip vs Infor CloudSuite
- Zip vs NetSuite
- Zip vs bexio
- Zip vs Bling
- Zip vs Striven
- Zip vs TallyPrime
- Zip vs Odoo
- Zip vs Jaggaer
- Zip vs Zycus
- Zip vs Global Shop Solutions
- Zip vs Katana MRP
- Zip vs Levelpath
- Zip vs OpenBravo
- Zip vs Infor
- Zip vs Java
- Zip vs Omnea
- Zip vs Ivalua
- Zip vs QAD ERP
- Zip vs SAP S/4HANA
- Zip vs Metasfresh
- Zip vs GEP SMART
- Zip vs Deltek
- Zip vs Axelor
- Zip vs Axonaut
- Zip vs BatchMaster
- Zip vs Blue Link ERP
