Softwr

Insurance · head to head

Hippo vs Verisk

Hippo logo

Hippo

Insurance

Homeowners insurance reimagined

From
On request
Rated
-
Verisk logo

Verisk

Insurance

Insurance data, ISO forms and rating content that most American P&C products are built on

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Hippo no published insurance rates or premium quotes on website; uses dynamic quote model based on individual circumstances; Verisk the ISO content has no real substitute for a carrier writing standard lines, so renewal negotiations start from a position where walking away is not credible.
  • They diverge on capability: Hippo covers Personalized quotes, Verisk covers ISO forms and rating content.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Hippo and Verisk actually diverge.

Attributes where Hippo and Verisk differ
AttributeHippoVerisk
PlatformsWeb, Ios, AndroidWeb, API, Windows
Founded2015Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Hippo

  • Personalized quotes
  • Digital policy management
  • 24/7 customer support
  • Mobile app
  • Smart home integrations
  • Claims support
  • Customizable coverage
  • Instant policy changes

Only in Verisk

  • ISO forms and rating content
  • ClaimSearch
  • Extreme event models
  • Property data
  • Xactimate
  • Underwriting analytics

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Hippo

  • Comparing home insurance quotes across multiple carrier partnersnot Verisk
  • Bundling home coverage with auto, flood, pet or landlord add on policiesnot Verisk

Verisk

  • A carrier filing standard commercial lines products that must use recognised forms and loss costsnot Hippo
  • A claims organisation checking submitted claims against the industry database for prior activitynot Hippo
  • A property insurer pricing catastrophe exposure for reinsurance placementnot Hippo
  • An MGA that needs bureau content without building and filing proprietary forms in every statenot Hippo

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Hippo

  • No published insurance rates or premium quotes on website; uses dynamic quote model based on individual circumstances

Verisk

  • The ISO content has no real substitute for a carrier writing standard lines, so renewal negotiations start from a position where walking away is not credible.
  • Pricing is negotiated separately per product and per line, and large insurers routinely find overlapping agreements across underwriting, claims and actuarial that nobody had counted together.
  • Circular updates to forms and loss costs must be loaded into your policy system on a schedule, which is recurring work that carriers with older platforms do partly by hand.
  • The breadth of the portfolio means account management is spread across product teams, so a problem in one service does not necessarily get attention from the people selling you another.
  • Usage-based components such as data prefill and claims searches make annual spend hard to forecast, and the variance lands in the year you grow fastest.

Pricing, plan by plan

Hippo

On request
  • Essential$undefined/month
    • Dwelling coverage
    • Personal property
    • Liability protection

Verisk

On request
  • Verisk Insurance Solutions$undefined/year
    • ISO forms and loss cost licensing
    • Data and analytics services by line
    • API access

Which should you pick?

Choose Hippo if

  • You need personalized quotes.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android.
  • You also want digital policy management.

Choose Verisk if

  • You need iso forms and rating content.
  • You work on Web, API, Windows.
  • You also want claimsearch.

Questions people ask

Is Hippo or Verisk better?
Neither clearly leads. Hippo starts at On request and Verisk at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Hippo or Verisk?
Hippo starts at On request and Verisk at On request.
Does Hippo or Verisk run on more platforms?
Hippo runs on Web, Ios, Android. Verisk runs on Web, API, Windows.
What is Hippo best used for?
Hippo is most often used for comparing home insurance quotes across multiple carrier partners, bundling home coverage with auto, flood, pet or landlord add on policies. Of those, comparing home insurance quotes across multiple carrier partners and bundling home coverage with auto, flood, pet or landlord add on policies are not what Verisk is typically brought in for.
What can Hippo do that Verisk cannot?
Hippo covers Personalized quotes, Digital policy management, 24/7 customer support, Mobile app. Verisk covers ISO forms and rating content, ClaimSearch, Extreme event models, Property data.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Hippo: What are Hippo's insurance rates?

Hippo does not publish specific premium rates on its website. The company offers personalized quotes from over 70 carrier partners and claims to provide affordable quotes in under 60 seconds. Actual pricing requires submitting your home information.

Source
Verisk: Can a carrier avoid ISO content entirely?

Only by developing and filing proprietary forms and rates, which a handful of large insurers do. For everyone else the filing and legal cost of independence exceeds the licence.

Verisk: Is Xactimate part of Verisk?

Yes. It came with the Xactware acquisition and is the dominant property claims estimating tool in North America, used by carriers and by the contractors they pay.

Verisk: Did Verisk sell off businesses?

Yes. It divested non-insurance units including its energy research business in 2023 and refocused on insurance data and analytics.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads