Insurance · head to head
Hippo vs Ivans

Ivans
Insurance
Carrier to agency data exchange infrastructure that sits under most US insurance agency management systems
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hippo no published insurance rates or premium quotes on website; uses dynamic quote model based on individual circumstances; Ivans applied Systems owns both Ivans and competing agency management systems, so the neutral infrastructure that every AMS depends on is controlled by one of the AMS vendors, a conflict that rival vendors have complained about for years.
- They diverge on capability: Hippo covers Personalized quotes, Ivans covers Ivans Download.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hippo and Ivans actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hippo
- Personalized quotes
- Digital policy management
- 24/7 customer support
- Mobile app
- Smart home integrations
- Claims support
- Customizable coverage
- Instant policy changes
Only in Ivans
- Ivans Download
- Ivans Exchange
- Ivans Distribution
- Market Appetite
- Download analytics for carriers
- Commission download
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hippo
- Comparing home insurance quotes across multiple carrier partnersnot Ivans
- Bundling home coverage with auto, flood, pet or landlord add on policiesnot Ivans
Ivans
- An agency evaluating a new management system that needs to confirm, carrier by carrier and line by line, which data will actually download before it signsnot Hippo
- A carrier launching a new line that wants agency systems to receive policy data automatically rather than by rekeying from a portalnot Hippo
- An MGA that wants its book visible to retail agencies in the same download flow as admitted carriersnot Hippo
- An agency operations lead auditing why commission reconciliation keeps failing, which usually turns out to be a missing or misconfigured download connectionnot Hippo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hippo
- No published insurance rates or premium quotes on website; uses dynamic quote model based on individual circumstances
Ivans
- Applied Systems owns both Ivans and competing agency management systems, so the neutral infrastructure that every AMS depends on is controlled by one of the AMS vendors, a conflict that rival vendors have complained about for years.
- Download coverage is decided by carriers, not by Ivans or your AMS, so a carrier that does not publish a line simply does not download it and no amount of configuration in your system will fix it.
- Eligibility requires that you are appointed and writing the line in that state, meaning newly appointed agencies wait on carrier-side setup with little visibility into where the request sits.
- Data quality varies sharply by carrier, and agencies routinely find that some carriers send incomplete or oddly mapped policy data that then has to be cleaned inside the AMS, undermining the point of automating it.
- Pricing is opaque and largely invisible to agencies because it is bundled into AMS and carrier agreements, which makes it impossible to judge what the network actually costs your business or to negotiate it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Hippo
On request- Essential$undefined/month
- Dwelling coverage
- Personal property
- Liability protection
Ivans
On request- Ivans$undefined/year
- Ivans Exchange is provided to agencies at no additional charge, with a possible fee for Citizens of Florida business
- Carrier and MGA participation, Ivans Distribution and appetite products are quoted
- Pricing is generally embedded in the agency management system or carrier agreement rather than billed separately to the agency
Which should you pick?
Choose Hippo if
- You need personalized quotes.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want digital policy management.
Questions people ask
- Is Hippo or Ivans better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hippo starts at On request and Ivans at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hippo or Ivans?
- Hippo starts at On request and Ivans at On request.
- Does Hippo or Ivans run on more platforms?
- Hippo runs on Web, Ios, Android. Ivans runs on Web.
- What is Hippo best used for?
- Hippo is most often used for comparing home insurance quotes across multiple carrier partners, bundling home coverage with auto, flood, pet or landlord add on policies. Of those, comparing home insurance quotes across multiple carrier partners and bundling home coverage with auto, flood, pet or landlord add on policies are not what Ivans is typically brought in for.
- What can Hippo do that Ivans cannot?
- Hippo covers Personalized quotes, Digital policy management, 24/7 customer support, Mobile app. Ivans covers Ivans Download, Ivans Exchange, Ivans Distribution, Market Appetite.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hippo: What are Hippo's insurance rates?
Hippo does not publish specific premium rates on its website. The company offers personalized quotes from over 70 carrier partners and claims to provide affordable quotes in under 60 seconds. Actual pricing requires submitting your home information.
SourceIvans: Do agencies pay for Ivans?
Ivans Exchange is provided to agencies at no additional cost, with a noted exception for business written with Citizens of Florida. The economics sit with carriers and with the agency management system vendors.
Ivans: Why is a carrier not downloading?
Almost always eligibility or carrier-side publication: you must be appointed and writing that line in that state, and the carrier must publish that line for download. Check the connection status in Ivans Exchange first.
Ivans: Is Ivans owned by Applied Systems?
Yes. That matters because Applied also sells Applied Epic and EZLynx, so a competing AMS depends on infrastructure run by a competitor.
Ivans: Can you switch AMS and keep your downloads?
Connections have to be re-pointed to the new system, which is a per-carrier request through Ivans Exchange and is a common source of migration delay.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hippo vs Duck Creek
- Hippo vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Hippo vs Duck Creek Policy
- Hippo vs Majesco
- Hippo vs Vertafore AMS360
- Hippo vs Kin Insurance
- Hippo vs Metromile
- Hippo vs Openly
- Hippo vs Applied Epic
- Hippo vs HawkSoft
- Hippo vs AgencyBloc
- Hippo vs Snapsheet Claims
- Hippo vs Bold Penguin
- Hippo vs Bolt Solutions
- Hippo vs BriteCore
- Hippo vs ClaimVantage
- Hippo vs CoverWallet
- Hippo vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Hippo vs Tarmika
- Hippo vs InsurancePro
- Hippo vs NowCerts
- Hippo vs Socotra
- Hippo vs QQCatalyst
- Hippo vs Embroker
- Hippo vs FINEOS
- Hippo vs Five Sigma
- Hippo vs FRISS
- Hippo vs Haven Life
- Hippo vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Ivans vs Duck Creek
- Ivans vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Ivans vs Duck Creek Policy
- Ivans vs Majesco
- Ivans vs Vertafore AMS360
- Ivans vs Kin Insurance
- Ivans vs Metromile
- Ivans vs Openly
- Ivans vs Applied Epic
- Ivans vs HawkSoft
- Ivans vs AgencyBloc
- Ivans vs Snapsheet Claims
- Ivans vs Bold Penguin
- Ivans vs Bolt Solutions
- Ivans vs BriteCore
- Ivans vs ClaimVantage
- Ivans vs CoverWallet
- Ivans vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Ivans vs Tarmika
- Ivans vs InsurancePro
- Ivans vs NowCerts
- Ivans vs Socotra
- Ivans vs QQCatalyst
- Ivans vs Embroker
- Ivans vs FINEOS
- Ivans vs Five Sigma
- Ivans vs FRISS
- Ivans vs Haven Life
- Ivans vs Guidewire PolicyCenter

