Softwr

Insurance · head to head

Origami Risk vs Verisk

Origami Risk logo

Origami Risk

Insurance

Integrated risk management platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Verisk logo

Verisk

Insurance

Insurance data, ISO forms and rating content that most American P&C products are built on

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Origami Risk pricing not published; requires quote request; Verisk the ISO content has no real substitute for a carrier writing standard lines, so renewal negotiations start from a position where walking away is not credible.
  • They diverge on capability: Origami Risk covers Claims administration, Verisk covers ISO forms and rating content.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Origami Risk and Verisk actually diverge.

Attributes where Origami Risk and Verisk differ
AttributeOrigami RiskVerisk
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
PlatformsWeb, Ios, Android, ApiWeb, API, Windows
Founded2009Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Origami Risk

  • Claims administration
  • Policy management
  • Risk analytics
  • Incident management
  • Safety compliance
  • Certificate tracking
  • Vendor management
  • Custom workflows

Only in Verisk

  • ISO forms and rating content
  • ClaimSearch
  • Extreme event models
  • Property data
  • Xactimate
  • Underwriting analytics

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Origami Risk

  • Claims administrationnot Verisk
  • Risk managementnot Verisk
  • Safety compliancenot Verisk
  • Insurance trackingnot Verisk
  • Analytics & reportingnot Verisk

Verisk

  • A carrier filing standard commercial lines products that must use recognised forms and loss costsnot Origami Risk
  • A claims organisation checking submitted claims against the industry database for prior activitynot Origami Risk
  • A property insurer pricing catastrophe exposure for reinsurance placementnot Origami Risk
  • An MGA that needs bureau content without building and filing proprietary forms in every statenot Origami Risk

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Origami Risk

  • Pricing not published; requires quote request

Verisk

  • The ISO content has no real substitute for a carrier writing standard lines, so renewal negotiations start from a position where walking away is not credible.
  • Pricing is negotiated separately per product and per line, and large insurers routinely find overlapping agreements across underwriting, claims and actuarial that nobody had counted together.
  • Circular updates to forms and loss costs must be loaded into your policy system on a schedule, which is recurring work that carriers with older platforms do partly by hand.
  • The breadth of the portfolio means account management is spread across product teams, so a problem in one service does not necessarily get attention from the people selling you another.
  • Usage-based components such as data prefill and claims searches make annual spend hard to forecast, and the variance lands in the year you grow fastest.

Pricing, plan by plan

Origami Risk

On request
  • Core Platform$undefined/year
    • Claims management
    • Policy tracking
    • Incident reporting
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • All Core features
    • Advanced analytics
    • Safety management

Verisk

On request
  • Verisk Insurance Solutions$undefined/year
    • ISO forms and loss cost licensing
    • Data and analytics services by line
    • API access

Which should you pick?

Choose Origami Risk if

  • You need claims administration.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want policy management.

Choose Verisk if

  • You need iso forms and rating content.
  • You work on Web, API, Windows.
  • You also want claimsearch.

Questions people ask

Is Origami Risk or Verisk better?
Neither clearly leads. Origami Risk starts at On request and Verisk at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Origami Risk or Verisk?
Origami Risk starts at On request and Verisk at On request.
Does Origami Risk or Verisk run on more platforms?
Origami Risk runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Verisk runs on Web, API, Windows.
What is Origami Risk best used for?
Origami Risk is most often used for claims administration, risk management, safety compliance, insurance tracking. Of those, claims administration and risk management are not what Verisk is typically brought in for.
What can Origami Risk do that Verisk cannot?
Origami Risk covers Claims administration, Policy management, Risk analytics, Incident management. Verisk covers ISO forms and rating content, ClaimSearch, Extreme event models, Property data.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Origami Risk: How is Origami Risk priced?

Origami Risk does not publish pricing on its website. Pricing is customized based on organization size, specific modules needed, and implementation scope. Contact sales to request a demo and pricing quote.

Source
Verisk: Can a carrier avoid ISO content entirely?

Only by developing and filing proprietary forms and rates, which a handful of large insurers do. For everyone else the filing and legal cost of independence exceeds the licence.

Verisk: Is Xactimate part of Verisk?

Yes. It came with the Xactware acquisition and is the dominant property claims estimating tool in North America, used by carriers and by the contractors they pay.

Verisk: Did Verisk sell off businesses?

Yes. It divested non-insurance units including its energy research business in 2023 and refocused on insurance data and analytics.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads