Insurance · head to head
Origami Risk vs Verisk

Verisk
Insurance
Insurance data, ISO forms and rating content that most American P&C products are built on
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Origami Risk pricing not published; requires quote request; Verisk the ISO content has no real substitute for a carrier writing standard lines, so renewal negotiations start from a position where walking away is not credible.
- They diverge on capability: Origami Risk covers Claims administration, Verisk covers ISO forms and rating content.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Origami Risk and Verisk actually diverge.
| Attribute | Origami Risk | Verisk |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Web, API, Windows |
| Founded | 2009 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Origami Risk
- Claims administration
- Policy management
- Risk analytics
- Incident management
- Safety compliance
- Certificate tracking
- Vendor management
- Custom workflows
Only in Verisk
- ISO forms and rating content
- ClaimSearch
- Extreme event models
- Property data
- Xactimate
- Underwriting analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Origami Risk
- Claims administrationnot Verisk
- Risk managementnot Verisk
- Safety compliancenot Verisk
- Insurance trackingnot Verisk
- Analytics & reportingnot Verisk
Verisk
- A carrier filing standard commercial lines products that must use recognised forms and loss costsnot Origami Risk
- A claims organisation checking submitted claims against the industry database for prior activitynot Origami Risk
- A property insurer pricing catastrophe exposure for reinsurance placementnot Origami Risk
- An MGA that needs bureau content without building and filing proprietary forms in every statenot Origami Risk
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Origami Risk
- Pricing not published; requires quote request
Verisk
- The ISO content has no real substitute for a carrier writing standard lines, so renewal negotiations start from a position where walking away is not credible.
- Pricing is negotiated separately per product and per line, and large insurers routinely find overlapping agreements across underwriting, claims and actuarial that nobody had counted together.
- Circular updates to forms and loss costs must be loaded into your policy system on a schedule, which is recurring work that carriers with older platforms do partly by hand.
- The breadth of the portfolio means account management is spread across product teams, so a problem in one service does not necessarily get attention from the people selling you another.
- Usage-based components such as data prefill and claims searches make annual spend hard to forecast, and the variance lands in the year you grow fastest.
Pricing, plan by plan
Origami Risk
On request- Core Platform$undefined/year
- Claims management
- Policy tracking
- Incident reporting
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- All Core features
- Advanced analytics
- Safety management
Verisk
On request- Verisk Insurance Solutions$undefined/year
- ISO forms and loss cost licensing
- Data and analytics services by line
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose Origami Risk if
- You need claims administration.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want policy management.
Choose Verisk if
- You need iso forms and rating content.
- You work on Web, API, Windows.
- You also want claimsearch.
Questions people ask
- Is Origami Risk or Verisk better?
- Neither clearly leads. Origami Risk starts at On request and Verisk at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Origami Risk or Verisk?
- Origami Risk starts at On request and Verisk at On request.
- Does Origami Risk or Verisk run on more platforms?
- Origami Risk runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Verisk runs on Web, API, Windows.
- What is Origami Risk best used for?
- Origami Risk is most often used for claims administration, risk management, safety compliance, insurance tracking. Of those, claims administration and risk management are not what Verisk is typically brought in for.
- What can Origami Risk do that Verisk cannot?
- Origami Risk covers Claims administration, Policy management, Risk analytics, Incident management. Verisk covers ISO forms and rating content, ClaimSearch, Extreme event models, Property data.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Origami Risk: How is Origami Risk priced?
Origami Risk does not publish pricing on its website. Pricing is customized based on organization size, specific modules needed, and implementation scope. Contact sales to request a demo and pricing quote.
SourceVerisk: Can a carrier avoid ISO content entirely?
Only by developing and filing proprietary forms and rates, which a handful of large insurers do. For everyone else the filing and legal cost of independence exceeds the licence.
Verisk: Is Xactimate part of Verisk?
Yes. It came with the Xactware acquisition and is the dominant property claims estimating tool in North America, used by carriers and by the contractors they pay.
Verisk: Did Verisk sell off businesses?
Yes. It divested non-insurance units including its energy research business in 2023 and refocused on insurance data and analytics.
Related pages
More on Origami Risk
Other head to heads
- Origami Risk vs Duck Creek
- Origami Risk vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Origami Risk vs Duck Creek Policy
- Origami Risk vs Five Sigma
- Origami Risk vs Shift Technology
- Origami Risk vs Insurity Suite
- Origami Risk vs FRISS
- Origami Risk vs Tarmika
- Origami Risk vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- Origami Risk vs Embroker
- Origami Risk vs FINEOS
- Origami Risk vs Haven Life
- Origami Risk vs Hippo
- Origami Risk vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Origami Risk vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Origami Risk vs TurboRater
- Origami Risk vs EZLynx
- Origami Risk vs INSTANDA
- Origami Risk vs InsurancePro
- Origami Risk vs Ivans
- Origami Risk vs BriteCore
- Origami Risk vs Socotra
- Origami Risk vs EIS Group
- Origami Risk vs Jenesis Software
- Origami Risk vs Novidea
- Origami Risk vs InsuredMine
- Origami Risk vs Insureon
- Origami Risk vs Indio
- Verisk vs Duck Creek
- Verisk vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Verisk vs Duck Creek Policy
- Verisk vs Five Sigma
- Verisk vs Shift Technology
- Verisk vs Insurity Suite
- Verisk vs FRISS
- Verisk vs Tarmika
- Verisk vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- Verisk vs Embroker
- Verisk vs FINEOS
- Verisk vs Haven Life
- Verisk vs Hippo
- Verisk vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Verisk vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Verisk vs TurboRater
- Verisk vs EZLynx
- Verisk vs INSTANDA
- Verisk vs InsurancePro
- Verisk vs Ivans
- Verisk vs BriteCore
- Verisk vs Socotra
- Verisk vs EIS Group
- Verisk vs Jenesis Software
- Verisk vs Novidea
- Verisk vs InsuredMine
- Verisk vs Insureon
- Verisk vs Indio

