Accounting · head to head
FloQast vs SAP Concur

FloQast
Accounting
Close management software for accounting teams
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -

SAP Concur
Accounting
Enterprise travel booking, expense claims and supplier invoice processing sold as separate modules
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FloQast no pricing is published, and the vendor states packages scale with business outcomes rather than seat count, which gives a buyer no unit to estimate against; SAP Concur implementation is done through SAP or a partner and commonly costs a substantial multiple of the first year subscription, because the value sits entirely in the configured policy, approval hierarchy and ledger mapping rather than in the software as shipped.
- They diverge on capability: FloQast covers Close management, SAP Concur covers Expense capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FloQast and SAP Concur actually diverge.
| Attribute | FloQast | SAP Concur |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, Ios, Android |
| Founded | 2013 | 1993 |
Identical on both: starting price ($29/month), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Accounting).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FloQast
- Close management
- Reconciliation
- Flux analysis
- Audit prep
- Team collaboration
- NetSuite
- QuickBooks
- Sage
Only in SAP Concur
- Expense capture
- Corporate card feeds
- Policy engine
- Approval routing
- Travel booking
- Travel agency integration
- Duty of care
- Invoice capture
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FloQast
- Managing the accounting close with checklists and reconciliationsnot SAP Concur
- Automating account reconciliation and compliance workflowsnot SAP Concur
SAP Concur
- A multinational with thousands of travellers where an audit committee has asked for evidence that travel policy is actually enforcednot FloQast
- An organisation replacing spreadsheet expense claims and email approvals that cannot survive an external auditnot FloQast
- A finance team trying to eliminate duplicate claims by matching corporate card feeds against submitted receiptsnot FloQast
- A shared service centre processing high volumes of supplier invoices that needs capture and approval routing before postingnot FloQast
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FloQast
- No pricing is published, and the vendor states packages scale with business outcomes rather than seat count, which gives a buyer no unit to estimate against
- The product is split into five separately packaged solution categories
- Every route to a figure runs through a personalised demo
SAP Concur
- Implementation is done through SAP or a partner and commonly costs a substantial multiple of the first year subscription, because the value sits entirely in the configured policy, approval hierarchy and ledger mapping rather than in the software as shipped.
- Pricing is driven by transaction volume, expense reports and invoices processed, rather than by seats, so a business with seasonal travel or a growth year sees the bill move in ways headcount based budgeting does not predict.
- The configuration that makes it valuable is also what makes it rigid, and organisations frequently find that changing an approval chain or adding a cost centre dimension requires a partner change order rather than an administrator's afternoon.
- Contracts are typically multi year with limited exit, so an organisation that concludes after twelve months that a lighter expense tool would have been enough is still paying for the heavier one for the remainder of the term.
- The three modules are licensed separately and the strongest case for the product depends on having travel, expense and card feeds together, so buying expense alone gives you a costly receipt system without the control loop that justifies the price.
Pricing, plan by plan
FloQast
$29/month- StandardFree
- Custom pricing
- Close management
- Reconciliation
SAP Concur
$29/month- Professional$8/month
- Expense reporting
- Receipt capture
- Approvals
- Premium$12/month
- Travel booking
- Invoice management
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose SAP Concur if
- You need expense capture.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want corporate card feeds.
Questions people ask
- Is FloQast or SAP Concur better?
- Neither clearly leads. FloQast starts at $29/month and SAP Concur at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FloQast or SAP Concur?
- FloQast starts at $29/month and SAP Concur at $29/month.
- Does FloQast or SAP Concur run on more platforms?
- FloQast runs on Web. SAP Concur runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- What is FloQast best used for?
- FloQast is most often used for managing the accounting close with checklists and reconciliations, automating account reconciliation and compliance workflows. Of those, managing the accounting close with checklists and reconciliations and automating account reconciliation and compliance workflows are not what SAP Concur is typically brought in for.
- What can FloQast do that SAP Concur cannot?
- FloQast covers Close management, Reconciliation, Flux analysis, Audit prep. SAP Concur covers Expense capture, Corporate card feeds, Policy engine, Approval routing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FloQast: How much does FloQast cost?
FloQast does not publish specific pricing with dollar amounts. Instead, the company offers customized packages that scale with business outcomes rather than seat count. Pricing is tailored to each organization's unique needs, scope, and scale.
SourceSAP Concur: Do we need SAP ERP to use Concur?
No. It integrates with SAP systems particularly well but it is regularly deployed alongside Oracle, NetSuite, Workday and other ledgers. The integration work is a line item in the implementation either way.
FloQast: Does FloQast charge per user?
No. FloQast explicitly states 'No Per-User Fees. Pricing Built Around Value, Not Headcount.' The company's pricing is customized to organizational requirements rather than based on the number of users.
SourceSAP Concur: Is it worth it for a company of a hundred people?
Usually not. Below a few hundred travellers the implementation cost and the contract commitment are hard to justify against lighter expense tools. The case turns on policy enforcement and audit, not on receipt scanning.
FloQast: What is FloQast's pricing model?
FloQast uses a value-based pricing approach with customizable packages across solutions like Close Management, Compliance & Risk, Financial Reporting, and AI Automation. Each organization receives a personalized pricing recommendation based on their unique challenges and objectives.
SourceSAP Concur: How is it priced?
Broadly on the volume of expense reports and invoices processed, with the modules licensed separately. Because pricing is quoted rather than published, get the volume assumptions written into the contract and check what happens when you exceed them.
SAP Concur: Can it handle multiple countries and currencies?
Yes, that is one of its stronger areas, including per country tax treatment and VAT reclaim identification. Confirm coverage for your specific countries during the sales process rather than assuming global means every jurisdiction.
SAP Concur: How long does implementation take?
Plan in months, not weeks, for anything beyond a single entity with simple approvals. Multi entity rollouts with travel and invoice modules commonly run across a year in phases.
SAP Concur: What does the audit service actually do?
It has a team review a sample or all of your submitted claims against receipts and policy before approval, which some organisations use in place of internal reviewers. It is priced separately from the expense subscription.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- FloQast vs QuickBooks
- FloQast vs Workiva
- FloQast vs Ramp
- FloQast vs Airbase
- FloQast vs Melio
- FloQast vs BlackLine
- FloQast vs Zoho Books
- FloQast vs Bill.com
- FloQast vs Sage 50
- FloQast vs Xero
- FloQast vs DATEV
- FloQast vs Pleo
- FloQast vs Medius
- FloQast vs Mercury
- FloQast vs Mesh Payments
- FloQast vs Money Forward Cloud
- FloQast vs Moneybird
- FloQast vs Medius Expense
- FloQast vs Happay
- FloQast vs Expensify
- FloQast vs Circula
- FloQast vs Zoho Expense
- FloQast vs Spendesk
- FloQast vs Fyle
- FloQast vs Rydoo
- FloQast vs Fortnox
- FloQast vs FreeAgent
- FloQast vs freee
- FloQast vs insightsoftware
- FloQast vs IRIS KashFlow
- SAP Concur vs QuickBooks
- SAP Concur vs Workiva
- SAP Concur vs Ramp
- SAP Concur vs Airbase
- SAP Concur vs Melio
- SAP Concur vs BlackLine
- SAP Concur vs Zoho Books
- SAP Concur vs Bill.com
- SAP Concur vs Sage 50
- SAP Concur vs Xero
- SAP Concur vs DATEV
- SAP Concur vs Pleo
- SAP Concur vs Medius
- SAP Concur vs Mercury
- SAP Concur vs Mesh Payments
- SAP Concur vs Money Forward Cloud
- SAP Concur vs Moneybird
- SAP Concur vs Medius Expense
- SAP Concur vs Happay
- SAP Concur vs Expensify
- SAP Concur vs Circula
- SAP Concur vs Zoho Expense
- SAP Concur vs Spendesk
- SAP Concur vs Fyle
- SAP Concur vs Rydoo
- SAP Concur vs Fortnox
- SAP Concur vs FreeAgent
- SAP Concur vs freee
- SAP Concur vs insightsoftware
- SAP Concur vs IRIS KashFlow
