Manufacturing · head to head
Fictiv vs Prodsmart

Fictiv
Manufacturing
On-demand custom manufacturing with instant CAD quoting, now owned by MISUMI
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Prodsmart
Manufacturing
Mobile manufacturing execution for small plants, acquired by Autodesk and folded into Fusion Operations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fictiv this is a manufacturing service, not software you licence, so there is nothing to deploy or own and switching means re-sourcing parts rather than exporting data.; Prodsmart the product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.
- They diverge on capability: Fictiv covers Instant CAD quoting, Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fictiv and Prodsmart actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fictiv
- Instant CAD quoting
- Design for manufacturing feedback
- Multi-region network
- Multiple processes
- Quality documentation
- Order and revision tracking
- Bridge to production
Only in Prodsmart
- Mobile shop floor declarations
- No controller integration required
- Traceability
- Live production status
- Basic OEE
- Maintenance records
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fictiv
- An engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop firstnot Prodsmart
- Moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a suppliernot Prodsmart
- Bridge production between prototype tooling and a committed high-volume suppliernot Prodsmart
- Getting design-for-manufacturing feedback on a part before committing to injection mould toolingnot Prodsmart
Prodsmart
- A small manufacturer with older machines that cannot be connected to any network without a costly retrofitnot Fictiv
- A plant that needs lot traceability for a customer or regulatory audit and currently keeps it on papernot Fictiv
- A shop wanting live work order status without installing terminals and cabling on the floornot Fictiv
- An Autodesk Fusion user looking for an operations layer from the same vendor as its CAD and CAMnot Fictiv
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fictiv
- This is a manufacturing service, not software you licence, so there is nothing to deploy or own and switching means re-sourcing parts rather than exporting data.
- A broker sits between you and the shop cutting your part, so at stable production volumes direct sourcing usually beats the platform price and the platform knows it.
- You do not choose or generally know the specific supplier, which makes process control, supplier audits and traceability harder in regulated or aerospace work.
- MISUMI completed a $350 million acquisition in June 2025, so roadmap and pricing now answer to a Japanese industrial components group rather than to an independent platform strategy.
- Instant quotes are geometry-driven and complex or tightly toleranced parts drop into engineer review, so the speed advantage that justified the choice disappears exactly on the parts that are hardest to source.
Prodsmart
- The product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.
- All data originates from operator declarations, so accuracy depends entirely on shop floor discipline, and a plant that cannot enforce scanning gets confident charts built on incomplete input.
- Because it reads nothing from machines, it cannot detect a stoppage the operator does not report, which means downtime analysis captures what people admit to rather than what happened.
- Scheduling and planning are shallow compared with a full MES or ERP, so most customers still plan elsewhere and use Prodsmart for execution only.
- Support and account management now run through a very large software vendor, and small manufacturers frequently report longer response paths than they had with the original company.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fictiv
On request- Per-part quoting$undefined/month
- No subscription or platform fee
- Priced per part by geometry, material, process and quantity
- Instant quotes for many processes, engineer review for complex parts
Prodsmart
On request- Prodsmart (Autodesk Fusion Operations)$undefined/year
- Mobile shop floor execution
- Traceability and production reporting
- Sold within the Autodesk Fusion product family
Which should you pick?
Choose Fictiv if
- You need instant cad quoting.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want design for manufacturing feedback.
Choose Prodsmart if
- You need mobile shop floor declarations.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no controller integration required.
Questions people ask
- Is Fictiv or Prodsmart better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fictiv starts at On request and Prodsmart at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fictiv or Prodsmart?
- Fictiv starts at On request and Prodsmart at On request.
- Does Fictiv or Prodsmart run on more platforms?
- Fictiv runs on Web, Cloud. Prodsmart runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Fictiv best used for?
- Fictiv is most often used for an engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop first, moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a supplier, bridge production between prototype tooling and a committed high-volume supplier, getting design-for-manufacturing feedback on a part before committing to injection mould tooling. Of those, an engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop first and moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a supplier are not what Prodsmart is typically brought in for.
- What can Fictiv do that Prodsmart cannot?
- Fictiv covers Instant CAD quoting, Design for manufacturing feedback, Multi-region network, Multiple processes. Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations, No controller integration required, Traceability, Live production status.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fictiv: Is Fictiv software I can buy?
No. It is an on-demand manufacturing service with a quoting and order management platform. You pay for parts, not for the software.
Prodsmart: Who owns Prodsmart?
Autodesk acquired it in 2022 and has integrated it into the Fusion product family as its operations offering.
Fictiv: Is Fictiv still independent?
No. MISUMI Group completed its acquisition, valued at $350 million, in June 2025. Fictiv continues to trade under its own name.
Prodsmart: Does it need my machines to be connected?
No. That is the central design decision. Operators declare production on mobile devices.
Fictiv: Do I know which factory makes my part?
Generally not. Fictiv manages a vetted network and allocates work within it, which is a limitation if your quality system requires named and audited suppliers.
Prodsmart: Is it a full MES?
It covers execution, traceability and basic OEE. Detailed scheduling, quality workflows and controller level data are not its scope.
Fictiv: Is it cheaper than sourcing directly?
For prototypes and low volumes, usually yes once you count the cost of finding and qualifying a supplier. At stable production volumes, direct sourcing is normally cheaper.
Prodsmart: Can I still buy it as a standalone product?
It is sold through Autodesk. Confirm the current packaging and pricing with Autodesk rather than relying on pre acquisition material.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fictiv vs SolidWorks
- Fictiv vs Xometry
- Fictiv vs Protolabs
- Fictiv vs AMFG
- Fictiv vs Materialise Magics
- Fictiv vs Oqton
- Fictiv vs Simplify3D
- Fictiv vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Fictiv vs Formlabs PreForm
- Fictiv vs GrabCAD Print
- Fictiv vs Markforged Eiger
- Fictiv vs KCF Technologies
- Fictiv vs MOVUS
- Fictiv vs Oden Technologies
- Fictiv vs OpenBOM
- Fictiv vs Tulip
- Fictiv vs MachineMetrics
- Fictiv vs TrakSYS
- Fictiv vs Authentise
- Fictiv vs Flow Software
- Fictiv vs QAD Redzone
- Fictiv vs 3YOURMIND
- Fictiv vs Sight Machine
- Fictiv vs Guidewheel
- Fictiv vs ProShop ERP
- Fictiv vs Ignition
- Fictiv vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Fictiv vs LabVIEW
- Fictiv vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Fictiv vs ABB 800xA
- Fictiv vs AVEVA System Platform
- Fictiv vs Hippo CMMS
- Prodsmart vs SolidWorks
- Prodsmart vs Xometry
- Prodsmart vs Protolabs
- Prodsmart vs AMFG
- Prodsmart vs Materialise Magics
- Prodsmart vs Oqton
- Prodsmart vs Simplify3D
- Prodsmart vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Prodsmart vs Formlabs PreForm
- Prodsmart vs GrabCAD Print
- Prodsmart vs Markforged Eiger
- Prodsmart vs KCF Technologies
- Prodsmart vs MOVUS
- Prodsmart vs Oden Technologies
- Prodsmart vs OpenBOM
- Prodsmart vs Tulip
- Prodsmart vs MachineMetrics
- Prodsmart vs TrakSYS
- Prodsmart vs Authentise
- Prodsmart vs Flow Software
- Prodsmart vs QAD Redzone
- Prodsmart vs 3YOURMIND
- Prodsmart vs Sight Machine
- Prodsmart vs Guidewheel
- Prodsmart vs ProShop ERP
- Prodsmart vs Ignition
- Prodsmart vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Prodsmart vs LabVIEW
- Prodsmart vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Prodsmart vs ABB 800xA
- Prodsmart vs AVEVA System Platform
- Prodsmart vs Hippo CMMS
