Manufacturing · head to head
Autodesk Netfabb vs Fictiv

Autodesk Netfabb
Manufacturing
Additive manufacturing build preparation and simulation, now sold only bundled with Fusion
- From
- $4415/year
- Rated
- -

Fictiv
Manufacturing
On-demand custom manufacturing with instant CAD quoting, now owned by MISUMI
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Autodesk Netfabb netfabb Ultimate has been retired outright, with no 2026 release and no renewals, so anyone who bought Ultimate is frozen on the 2025.1 build and must accept the repackaged Netfabb instead.; Fictiv this is a manufacturing service, not software you licence, so there is nothing to deploy or own and switching means re-sourcing parts rather than exporting data.
- They diverge on capability: Autodesk Netfabb covers Mesh repair, Fictiv covers Instant CAD quoting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Autodesk Netfabb and Fictiv actually diverge.
| Attribute | Autodesk Netfabb | Fictiv |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $4415/year | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per year | quote |
| Platforms | Windows, Desktop | Web, Cloud |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Autodesk Netfabb
- Mesh repair
- Build orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build simulation
- Geometry compensation
- Lattice and shell structures
- Machine library
- Fusion bundle
Only in Fictiv
- Instant CAD quoting
- Design for manufacturing feedback
- Multi-region network
- Multiple processes
- Quality documentation
- Order and revision tracking
- Bridge to production
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Autodesk Netfabb
- A metal additive bureau predicting distortion on a laser powder bed build before committing twenty hours of machine timenot Fictiv
- An aerospace supplier applying automatic geometry compensation so printed parts land within tolerance without iterative trial buildsnot Fictiv
- A production department nesting hundreds of small parts into a single polymer build to raise volume utilisationnot Fictiv
- An engineering team that already subscribes to Fusion and wants AM preparation without adding a second vendornot Fictiv
Fictiv
- An engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop firstnot Autodesk Netfabb
- Moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a suppliernot Autodesk Netfabb
- Bridge production between prototype tooling and a committed high-volume suppliernot Autodesk Netfabb
- Getting design-for-manufacturing feedback on a part before committing to injection mould toolingnot Autodesk Netfabb
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Autodesk Netfabb
- Netfabb Ultimate has been retired outright, with no 2026 release and no renewals, so anyone who bought Ultimate is frozen on the 2025.1 build and must accept the repackaged Netfabb instead.
- Autodesk has ended development of the Selective Space Structures, Optimization Utility and Lattice Topology utilities, which removes capability some customers specifically bought the product for.
- It is now only sold bundled as Autodesk Fusion with Netfabb, so a shop that has standardised on other CAD pays for Fusion entitlements it will not use.
- At around 4,415 US dollars per seat per year it is far above slicer-class tools, and the pricing is per named user with no floating option in the standard subscription, which hurts teams where the AM engineer role is shared.
- Machine coverage is broad but not universal, and the newest printers from smaller manufacturers often reach their vendor own preparation software long before a Netfabb profile appears.
Fictiv
- This is a manufacturing service, not software you licence, so there is nothing to deploy or own and switching means re-sourcing parts rather than exporting data.
- A broker sits between you and the shop cutting your part, so at stable production volumes direct sourcing usually beats the platform price and the platform knows it.
- You do not choose or generally know the specific supplier, which makes process control, supplier audits and traceability harder in regulated or aerospace work.
- MISUMI completed a $350 million acquisition in June 2025, so roadmap and pricing now answer to a Japanese industrial components group rather than to an independent platform strategy.
- Instant quotes are geometry-driven and complex or tightly toleranced parts drop into engineer review, so the speed advantage that justified the choice disappears exactly on the parts that are hardest to source.
Pricing, plan by plan
Autodesk Netfabb
$4415/year- Autodesk Fusion with Netfabb$4415/year
- Single-user subscription
- Netfabb build preparation, formerly Premium
- Selected functionality from the retired Ultimate edition
- Netfabb Simulation$undefined/year
- Metal powder bed build simulation
- Quoted through Autodesk sales, no published price
Fictiv
On request- Per-part quoting$undefined/month
- No subscription or platform fee
- Priced per part by geometry, material, process and quantity
- Instant quotes for many processes, engineer review for complex parts
Which should you pick?
Choose Autodesk Netfabb if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows, Desktop.
- You also want build orientation and nesting.
Choose Fictiv if
- You need instant cad quoting.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want design for manufacturing feedback.
Questions people ask
- Is Autodesk Netfabb or Fictiv better?
- Neither clearly leads. Autodesk Netfabb starts at $4415/year and Fictiv at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Autodesk Netfabb or Fictiv?
- Autodesk Netfabb starts at $4415/year and Fictiv at On request.
- Does Autodesk Netfabb or Fictiv run on more platforms?
- Autodesk Netfabb runs on Windows, Desktop. Fictiv runs on Web, Cloud.
- What is Autodesk Netfabb best used for?
- Autodesk Netfabb is most often used for a metal additive bureau predicting distortion on a laser powder bed build before committing twenty hours of machine time, an aerospace supplier applying automatic geometry compensation so printed parts land within tolerance without iterative trial builds, a production department nesting hundreds of small parts into a single polymer build to raise volume utilisation, an engineering team that already subscribes to fusion and wants am preparation without adding a second vendor. Of those, a metal additive bureau predicting distortion on a laser powder bed build before committing twenty hours of machine time and an aerospace supplier applying automatic geometry compensation so printed parts land within tolerance without iterative trial builds are not what Fictiv is typically brought in for.
- What can Autodesk Netfabb do that Fictiv cannot?
- Autodesk Netfabb covers Mesh repair, Build orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build simulation. Fictiv covers Instant CAD quoting, Design for manufacturing feedback, Multi-region network, Multiple processes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Autodesk Netfabb: Is Netfabb discontinued?
No, but Netfabb Ultimate is. There is a 2026 release of Netfabb, sold only as Autodesk Fusion with Netfabb. Ultimate licences cannot be renewed.
Fictiv: Is Fictiv software I can buy?
No. It is an on-demand manufacturing service with a quoting and order management platform. You pay for parts, not for the software.
Autodesk Netfabb: What does it cost?
The Fusion with Netfabb single-user subscription is listed at roughly 4,415 US dollars a year. Netfabb Simulation is quoted separately.
Fictiv: Is Fictiv still independent?
No. MISUMI Group completed its acquisition, valued at $350 million, in June 2025. Fictiv continues to trade under its own name.
Autodesk Netfabb: Is there a perpetual licence?
No. Autodesk sells subscription only across its product range.
Fictiv: Do I know which factory makes my part?
Generally not. Fictiv manages a vetted network and allocates work within it, which is a limitation if your quality system requires named and audited suppliers.
Autodesk Netfabb: Do I need Fusion to use it?
You do not have to use Fusion, but you now pay for it, because the bundle is the only way Netfabb is sold.
Fictiv: Is it cheaper than sourcing directly?
For prototypes and low volumes, usually yes once you count the cost of finding and qualifying a supplier. At stable production volumes, direct sourcing is normally cheaper.
Related pages
More on Autodesk Netfabb
Other head to heads
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Materialise Magics
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Oqton
- Autodesk Netfabb vs GrabCAD Print
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Simplify3D
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Formlabs PreForm
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Markforged Eiger
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Dyndrite
- Autodesk Netfabb vs 3YOURMIND
- Autodesk Netfabb vs AMFG
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Authentise
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Protolabs
- Autodesk Netfabb vs ABB 800xA
- Autodesk Netfabb vs AVEVA System Platform
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Hippo CMMS
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Autodesk Netfabb vs SolidWorks
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Xometry
- Autodesk Netfabb vs KCF Technologies
- Autodesk Netfabb vs MOVUS
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Oden Technologies
- Autodesk Netfabb vs OpenBOM
- Fictiv vs Materialise Magics
- Fictiv vs Oqton
- Fictiv vs GrabCAD Print
- Fictiv vs Simplify3D
- Fictiv vs Formlabs PreForm
- Fictiv vs Markforged Eiger
- Fictiv vs Dyndrite
- Fictiv vs 3YOURMIND
- Fictiv vs AMFG
- Fictiv vs Authentise
- Fictiv vs Protolabs
- Fictiv vs ABB 800xA
- Fictiv vs AVEVA System Platform
- Fictiv vs Hippo CMMS
- Fictiv vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Fictiv vs SolidWorks
- Fictiv vs Xometry
- Fictiv vs KCF Technologies
- Fictiv vs MOVUS
- Fictiv vs Oden Technologies
- Fictiv vs OpenBOM
