Manufacturing · head to head
Authentise vs Prodsmart

Authentise
Manufacturing
Modular MES and workflow automation for additive manufacturing, with ITAR-capable deployment options
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Prodsmart
Manufacturing
Mobile manufacturing execution for small plants, acquired by Autodesk and folded into Fusion Operations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authentise nothing is published about price, and modular licensing means the quoted entry module rarely resembles the cost of a configuration that actually runs a production floor.; Prodsmart the product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.
- They diverge on capability: Authentise covers Additive workflow automation, Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authentise and Prodsmart actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authentise | Prodsmart |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authentise
- Additive workflow automation
- Machine data capture
- Modular deployment
- ITAR-capable hosting
- Scheduling
Only in Prodsmart
- Mobile shop floor declarations
- No controller integration required
- Live production status
- Basic OEE
- Maintenance records
Both cover
- Traceability
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authentise
- An additive service bureau tracking jobs across a mixed fleet of printers from several vendorsnot Prodsmart
- An aerospace supplier that needs powder batch to part traceability as qualification evidencenot Prodsmart
- A defence programme requiring export-controlled geometry handled under ITAR-compliant hostingnot Prodsmart
- A corporate additive team standardising build preparation and post-processing steps across sitesnot Prodsmart
Prodsmart
- A small manufacturer with older machines that cannot be connected to any network without a costly retrofitnot Authentise
- A plant that needs lot traceability for a customer or regulatory audit and currently keeps it on papernot Authentise
- A shop wanting live work order status without installing terminals and cabling on the floornot Authentise
- An Autodesk Fusion user looking for an operations layer from the same vendor as its CAD and CAMnot Authentise
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authentise
- Nothing is published about price, and modular licensing means the quoted entry module rarely resembles the cost of a configuration that actually runs a production floor.
- It is additive-specific, so a shop with significant machining, casting or fabrication work still needs a second MES and an integration between them.
- The ITAR-capable deployment that justifies the price is irrelevant to purely commercial shops, which then find the system expensive relative to general manufacturing software.
- Integrating with the ERP and PLM systems that already hold part and order data is project work, and the burden falls on a small vendor rather than a large systems integrator ecosystem.
- Company scale is modest against the industrial software incumbents, which is a real consideration for a system sitting in the traceability path of qualified aerospace parts.
Prodsmart
- The product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.
- All data originates from operator declarations, so accuracy depends entirely on shop floor discipline, and a plant that cannot enforce scanning gets confident charts built on incomplete input.
- Because it reads nothing from machines, it cannot detect a stoppage the operator does not report, which means downtime analysis captures what people admit to rather than what happened.
- Scheduling and planning are shallow compared with a full MES or ERP, so most customers still plan elsewhere and use Prodsmart for execution only.
- Support and account management now run through a very large software vendor, and small manufacturers frequently report longer response paths than they had with the original company.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authentise
On request- Authentise Flows and MES modules$undefined/year
- Modular licensing by function
- Public cloud, private SaaS or ITAR-compliant deployment
- Machine data capture and traceability
Prodsmart
On request- Prodsmart (Autodesk Fusion Operations)$undefined/year
- Mobile shop floor execution
- Traceability and production reporting
- Sold within the Autodesk Fusion product family
Which should you pick?
Choose Authentise if
- You need additive workflow automation.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want machine data capture.
Choose Prodsmart if
- You need mobile shop floor declarations.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no controller integration required.
Questions people ask
- Is Authentise or Prodsmart better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authentise starts at On request and Prodsmart at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authentise or Prodsmart?
- Authentise starts at On request and Prodsmart at On request.
- Does Authentise or Prodsmart run on more platforms?
- Authentise runs on Web, API. Prodsmart runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Authentise best used for?
- Authentise is most often used for an additive service bureau tracking jobs across a mixed fleet of printers from several vendors, an aerospace supplier that needs powder batch to part traceability as qualification evidence, a defence programme requiring export-controlled geometry handled under itar-compliant hosting, a corporate additive team standardising build preparation and post-processing steps across sites. Of those, an additive service bureau tracking jobs across a mixed fleet of printers from several vendors and an aerospace supplier that needs powder batch to part traceability as qualification evidence are not what Prodsmart is typically brought in for.
- What can Authentise do that Prodsmart cannot?
- Authentise covers Additive workflow automation, Machine data capture, Modular deployment, ITAR-capable hosting. Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations, No controller integration required, Live production status, Basic OEE. Both handle Traceability.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authentise: How is Authentise priced?
It is not published. Licensing is modular and quoted annually, with integration and onboarding priced separately.
Prodsmart: Who owns Prodsmart?
Autodesk acquired it in 2022 and has integrated it into the Fusion product family as its operations offering.
Authentise: Can it handle ITAR-controlled work?
Yes. It offers ITAR-compliant deployment alongside public cloud and private SaaS, which is a primary reason defence suppliers choose it.
Prodsmart: Does it need my machines to be connected?
No. That is the central design decision. Operators declare production on mobile devices.
Authentise: Does it work with printers from more than one manufacturer?
Yes. It is designed for mixed fleets and captures machine data across vendors, which single-vendor software will not do.
Prodsmart: Is it a full MES?
It covers execution, traceability and basic OEE. Detailed scheduling, quality workflows and controller level data are not its scope.
Authentise: Is it a full MES for a general machine shop?
No. It is built around additive workflows; subtractive-heavy shops need a general MES as well.
Prodsmart: Can I still buy it as a standalone product?
It is sold through Autodesk. Confirm the current packaging and pricing with Autodesk rather than relying on pre acquisition material.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Authentise vs Fulcrum
- Authentise vs Tulip
- Authentise vs MachineMetrics
- Authentise vs Oqton
- Authentise vs 3YOURMIND
- Authentise vs TrakSYS
- Authentise vs AMFG
- Authentise vs Materialise Magics
- Authentise vs Flow Software
- Authentise vs ProShop ERP
- Authentise vs Ignition
- Authentise vs QAD Redzone
- Authentise vs Seeq
- Authentise vs Sensemore
- Authentise vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Authentise vs Simplify3D
- Authentise vs TrendMiner
- Authentise vs Sight Machine
- Authentise vs Guidewheel
- Authentise vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Authentise vs LabVIEW
- Authentise vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Authentise vs ABB 800xA
- Authentise vs AVEVA System Platform
- Authentise vs Hippo CMMS
- Prodsmart vs Fulcrum
- Prodsmart vs Tulip
- Prodsmart vs MachineMetrics
- Prodsmart vs Oqton
- Prodsmart vs 3YOURMIND
- Prodsmart vs TrakSYS
- Prodsmart vs AMFG
- Prodsmart vs Materialise Magics
- Prodsmart vs Flow Software
- Prodsmart vs ProShop ERP
- Prodsmart vs Ignition
- Prodsmart vs QAD Redzone
- Prodsmart vs Seeq
- Prodsmart vs Sensemore
- Prodsmart vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Prodsmart vs Simplify3D
- Prodsmart vs TrendMiner
- Prodsmart vs Sight Machine
- Prodsmart vs Guidewheel
- Prodsmart vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Prodsmart vs LabVIEW
- Prodsmart vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Prodsmart vs ABB 800xA
- Prodsmart vs AVEVA System Platform
- Prodsmart vs Hippo CMMS
