Manufacturing · head to head
Fictiv vs SolidWorks

Fictiv
Manufacturing
On-demand custom manufacturing with instant CAD quoting, now owned by MISUMI
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

SolidWorks
Manufacturing
Parametric desktop 3D CAD from Dassault Systemes, now sold as named-user subscription on the 3DEXPERIENCE platform
- From
- $2820/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fictiv this is a manufacturing service, not software you licence, so there is nothing to deploy or own and switching means re-sourcing parts rather than exporting data.; SolidWorks the desktop application is Windows only, so Mac and Linux users need a virtual machine, a Windows workstation or the separate cloud xDesign product at 2,580 USD a year.
- They diverge on capability: Fictiv covers Instant CAD quoting, SolidWorks covers 3D solid modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fictiv and SolidWorks actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fictiv | SolidWorks |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $2820/year |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per year |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud | Windows |
| Founded | Unknown | 1993 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fictiv
- Instant CAD quoting
- Design for manufacturing feedback
- Multi-region network
- Multiple processes
- Quality documentation
- Order and revision tracking
- Bridge to production
Only in SolidWorks
- 3D solid modeling
- Assembly design
- Technical drawings
- Simulation
- Rendering
- PDM systems
- ERP systems
- CAM software
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fictiv
- An engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop firstnot SolidWorks
- Moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a suppliernot SolidWorks
- Bridge production between prototype tooling and a committed high-volume suppliernot SolidWorks
- Getting design-for-manufacturing feedback on a part before committing to injection mould toolingnot SolidWorks
SolidWorks
- Product designnot Fictiv
- Engineering analysisnot Fictiv
- Manufacturing documentationnot Fictiv
- Prototypingnot Fictiv
- Quality controlnot Fictiv
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fictiv
- This is a manufacturing service, not software you licence, so there is nothing to deploy or own and switching means re-sourcing parts rather than exporting data.
- A broker sits between you and the shop cutting your part, so at stable production volumes direct sourcing usually beats the platform price and the platform knows it.
- You do not choose or generally know the specific supplier, which makes process control, supplier audits and traceability harder in regulated or aerospace work.
- MISUMI completed a $350 million acquisition in June 2025, so roadmap and pricing now answer to a Japanese industrial components group rather than to an independent platform strategy.
- Instant quotes are geometry-driven and complex or tightly toleranced parts drop into engineer review, so the speed advantage that justified the choice disappears exactly on the parts that are hardest to source.
SolidWorks
- The desktop application is Windows only, so Mac and Linux users need a virtual machine, a Windows workstation or the separate cloud xDesign product at 2,580 USD a year.
- Perpetual licences are no longer sold through the vendor online store and come only through resellers, and a perpetual licence still needs a paid annual service contract to get upgrades and support, so buying once and paying nothing again is not really on offer.
- Named-user subscription is per person rather than floating, so an organisation where several engineers each use CAD occasionally pays full seats for part-time use unless it negotiates otherwise.
- History-based parametric modelling breaks noisily: a change high in the feature tree can cascade rebuild errors through an assembly, which is a real productivity cost compared with direct modelling tools.
- Large assemblies stress single-threaded desktop performance, and teams routinely resort to configurations, simplified representations and expensive workstations rather than the software scaling on its own.
- The Maker licence watermarks its files so they can only be opened on other Maker licences, which means hobby work cannot be carried into a commercial seat later without exporting to neutral formats and losing the feature history.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fictiv
On request- Per-part quoting$undefined/month
- No subscription or platform fee
- Priced per part by geometry, material, process and quantity
- Instant quotes for many processes, engineer review for complex parts
SolidWorks
$2820/year- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Standard$2820/year
- 235 USD per month billed annually, or 846 USD per quarter
- Per named user, excluding local tax
- Part and assembly modelling and 2D drawings
- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Professional$3456/year
- 288 USD per month billed annually, or 1,038 USD per quarter
- Everything in Standard
- Intelligent CAD libraries of standard fasteners
- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Premium$4716/year
- 393 USD per month billed annually, or 1,416 USD per quarter
- Everything in Professional
- Linear static analysis for parts and assemblies
- SOLIDWORKS xDesign$2580/year
- 810 USD per quarter
- Browser-based cloud modelling, no local install
- Runs on Mac, Chromebook and tablets as well as Windows
Which should you pick?
Choose Fictiv if
- You need instant cad quoting.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want design for manufacturing feedback.
Choose SolidWorks if
- You need 3d solid modeling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want assembly design.
Questions people ask
- Is Fictiv or SolidWorks better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fictiv starts at On request and SolidWorks at $2820/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fictiv or SolidWorks?
- Fictiv starts at On request and SolidWorks at $2820/year.
- Does Fictiv or SolidWorks run on more platforms?
- Fictiv runs on Web, Cloud. SolidWorks runs on Windows.
- What is Fictiv best used for?
- Fictiv is most often used for an engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop first, moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a supplier, bridge production between prototype tooling and a committed high-volume supplier, getting design-for-manufacturing feedback on a part before committing to injection mould tooling. Of those, an engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop first and moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a supplier are not what SolidWorks is typically brought in for.
- What can Fictiv do that SolidWorks cannot?
- Fictiv covers Instant CAD quoting, Design for manufacturing feedback, Multi-region network, Multiple processes. SolidWorks covers 3D solid modeling, Assembly design, Technical drawings, Simulation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fictiv: Is Fictiv software I can buy?
No. It is an on-demand manufacturing service with a quoting and order management platform. You pay for parts, not for the software.
SolidWorks: Can you still buy a SOLIDWORKS perpetual licence?
Not from the vendor online store, which sells only term subscriptions. Perpetual licences remain available through resellers, but they still require a paid annual subscription service contract for upgrades and support.
Fictiv: Is Fictiv still independent?
No. MISUMI Group completed its acquisition, valued at $350 million, in June 2025. Fictiv continues to trade under its own name.
SolidWorks: How much does SOLIDWORKS cost per year?
The 3DS store lists Standard at 2,820 USD, Professional at 3,456 USD and Premium at 4,716 USD per named user per year, excluding local tax. Quarterly terms are 846, 1,038 and 1,416 USD.
Fictiv: Do I know which factory makes my part?
Generally not. Fictiv manages a vetted network and allocates work within it, which is a limitation if your quality system requires named and audited suppliers.
SolidWorks: What is the difference between desktop SOLIDWORKS and the 3DEXPERIENCE cloud tiers?
The desktop application still does the modelling and installs locally on Windows. The 3DEXPERIENCE platform adds cloud storage, versioning, mark-up and shared review around it. SOLIDWORKS xDesign is the separate browser-native modeller at 2,580 USD a year, and it runs on Mac and Chromebook.
Fictiv: Is it cheaper than sourcing directly?
For prototypes and low volumes, usually yes once you count the cost of finding and qualifying a supplier. At stable production volumes, direct sourcing is normally cheaper.
SolidWorks: Is there a cheap version for hobbyists?
Yes. 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS for Makers is 48 USD a year or 15 USD a month, limited to personal use with project sales under 2,000 USD a year, and its files are watermarked for Maker licences only.
SolidWorks: Does SOLIDWORKS run on a Mac?
Not natively. Use the browser-based xDesign, or run the desktop application in a Windows virtual machine.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fictiv vs Xometry
- Fictiv vs Protolabs
- Fictiv vs AMFG
- Fictiv vs Materialise Magics
- Fictiv vs Oqton
- Fictiv vs Simplify3D
- Fictiv vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Fictiv vs Formlabs PreForm
- Fictiv vs GrabCAD Print
- Fictiv vs Markforged Eiger
- Fictiv vs KCF Technologies
- Fictiv vs MOVUS
- Fictiv vs Oden Technologies
- Fictiv vs OpenBOM
- Fictiv vs Fusion 360
- Fictiv vs Fulcrum
- Fictiv vs Tulip
- Fictiv vs MachineMetrics
- Fictiv vs Aras Innovator
- Fictiv vs AVEVA System Platform
- Fictiv vs Seeq
- Fictiv vs Propel
- Fictiv vs PTC Windchill
- Fictiv vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Fictiv vs Flow Software
- Fictiv vs GENESIS Version 11
- Fictiv vs Guidewheel
- Fictiv vs JobBOSS²
- SolidWorks vs Xometry
- SolidWorks vs Protolabs
- SolidWorks vs AMFG
- SolidWorks vs Materialise Magics
- SolidWorks vs Oqton
- SolidWorks vs Simplify3D
- SolidWorks vs Autodesk Netfabb
- SolidWorks vs Formlabs PreForm
- SolidWorks vs GrabCAD Print
- SolidWorks vs Markforged Eiger
- SolidWorks vs KCF Technologies
- SolidWorks vs MOVUS
- SolidWorks vs Oden Technologies
- SolidWorks vs OpenBOM
- SolidWorks vs Fusion 360
- SolidWorks vs Fulcrum
- SolidWorks vs Tulip
- SolidWorks vs MachineMetrics
- SolidWorks vs Aras Innovator
- SolidWorks vs AVEVA System Platform
- SolidWorks vs Seeq
- SolidWorks vs Propel
- SolidWorks vs PTC Windchill
- SolidWorks vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- SolidWorks vs Flow Software
- SolidWorks vs GENESIS Version 11
- SolidWorks vs Guidewheel
- SolidWorks vs JobBOSS²
