Manufacturing · head to head
Prodsmart vs Xometry

Prodsmart
Manufacturing
Mobile manufacturing execution for small plants, acquired by Autodesk and folded into Fusion Operations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Xometry
Manufacturing
Custom parts marketplace whose quoting software is free because the money is in the order
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Xometry has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Prodsmart the product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.; Xometry xometry is the counterparty rather than the shop, and the margin between what you pay and what the maker receives is never disclosed, so buyers cannot benchmark the part price.
- They diverge on capability: Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations, Xometry covers Instant Quoting Engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Prodsmart and Xometry actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Prodsmart
- Mobile shop floor declarations
- No controller integration required
- Traceability
- Live production status
- Basic OEE
- Maintenance records
Only in Xometry
- Instant Quoting Engine
- Multi-process coverage
- Teamspace
- Thomasnet
- Supplier network
- Certifications
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Prodsmart
- A small manufacturer with older machines that cannot be connected to any network without a costly retrofitnot Xometry
- A plant that needs lot traceability for a customer or regulatory audit and currently keeps it on papernot Xometry
- A shop wanting live work order status without installing terminals and cabling on the floornot Xometry
- An Autodesk Fusion user looking for an operations layer from the same vendor as its CAD and CAMnot Xometry
Xometry
- An engineering team needing machined prototypes in a week without qualifying a shopnot Prodsmart
- A procurement group consolidating dozens of low-value part suppliers onto one purchase ordernot Prodsmart
- A startup with no supply chain buying a first low-volume production runnot Prodsmart
- A design team price-checking a geometry change before committing to itnot Prodsmart
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Prodsmart
- The product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.
- All data originates from operator declarations, so accuracy depends entirely on shop floor discipline, and a plant that cannot enforce scanning gets confident charts built on incomplete input.
- Because it reads nothing from machines, it cannot detect a stoppage the operator does not report, which means downtime analysis captures what people admit to rather than what happened.
- Scheduling and planning are shallow compared with a full MES or ERP, so most customers still plan elsewhere and use Prodsmart for execution only.
- Support and account management now run through a very large software vendor, and small manufacturers frequently report longer response paths than they had with the original company.
Xometry
- Xometry is the counterparty rather than the shop, and the margin between what you pay and what the maker receives is never disclosed, so buyers cannot benchmark the part price.
- You usually do not choose or even know which supplier makes the part, so repeat orders can come from different shops with visibly different finish and process consistency.
- For parts bought repeatedly over years the marketplace margin compounds, and qualifying a shop directly becomes materially cheaper.
- Instant quotes are geometry-driven and degrade on unusual features, tight tolerances or complex assemblies, where a manual review changes the price after you have planned around the automated figure.
- Because the software is free and the revenue is in orders, there is no software contract to hold the vendor to; support and continuity are governed by your value as a parts customer, not by a licence.
Pricing, plan by plan
Prodsmart
On request- Prodsmart (Autodesk Fusion Operations)$undefined/year
- Mobile shop floor execution
- Traceability and production reporting
- Sold within the Autodesk Fusion product family
Xometry
Free- Buyer accountFree
- Instant Quoting Engine at no charge
- Teamspace collaboration
- Thomasnet sourcing access
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated part pricing and terms
- Dedicated account and programme management
- Procurement system integration
Which should you pick?
Choose Prodsmart if
- You need mobile shop floor declarations.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no controller integration required.
Choose Xometry if
- You need instant quoting engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want multi-process coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Prodsmart or Xometry better?
- Neither clearly leads. Prodsmart starts at On request and Xometry at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Prodsmart or Xometry?
- Xometry has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Prodsmart and Free for Xometry.
- Does Prodsmart or Xometry run on more platforms?
- Prodsmart runs on Web, iOS, Android. Xometry runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Xometry for free?
- Yes. Xometry has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Prodsmart starts at On request.
- What is Prodsmart best used for?
- Prodsmart is most often used for a small manufacturer with older machines that cannot be connected to any network without a costly retrofit, a plant that needs lot traceability for a customer or regulatory audit and currently keeps it on paper, a shop wanting live work order status without installing terminals and cabling on the floor, an autodesk fusion user looking for an operations layer from the same vendor as its cad and cam. Of those, a small manufacturer with older machines that cannot be connected to any network without a costly retrofit and a plant that needs lot traceability for a customer or regulatory audit and currently keeps it on paper are not what Xometry is typically brought in for.
- What can Prodsmart do that Xometry cannot?
- Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations, No controller integration required, Traceability, Live production status. Xometry covers Instant Quoting Engine, Multi-process coverage, Teamspace, Thomasnet.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Prodsmart: Who owns Prodsmart?
Autodesk acquired it in 2022 and has integrated it into the Fusion product family as its operations offering.
Xometry: Does the Xometry software cost anything?
No. Quoting and Teamspace are free. Xometry earns on the parts you order, with the margin built into the part price.
Prodsmart: Does it need my machines to be connected?
No. That is the central design decision. Operators declare production on mobile devices.
Xometry: Do I get to choose the shop?
Normally no. Xometry routes the job within its supplier network and remains your contracting party.
Prodsmart: Is it a full MES?
It covers execution, traceability and basic OEE. Detailed scheduling, quality workflows and controller level data are not its scope.
Xometry: Is it cheaper than going direct to a machine shop?
For one-off and low-volume work usually yes, once you count sourcing time. For repeat production the marketplace margin makes a direct qualified supplier cheaper.
Prodsmart: Can I still buy it as a standalone product?
It is sold through Autodesk. Confirm the current packaging and pricing with Autodesk rather than relying on pre acquisition material.
Xometry: Can it handle ITAR or aerospace work?
It offers ITAR-registered and AS9100 routing on qualifying orders, but you must specify those requirements at quote time.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Prodsmart vs Tulip
- Prodsmart vs MachineMetrics
- Prodsmart vs TrakSYS
- Prodsmart vs Authentise
- Prodsmart vs Oqton
- Prodsmart vs Flow Software
- Prodsmart vs QAD Redzone
- Prodsmart vs 3YOURMIND
- Prodsmart vs Sight Machine
- Prodsmart vs Guidewheel
- Prodsmart vs ProShop ERP
- Prodsmart vs Ignition
- Prodsmart vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Prodsmart vs LabVIEW
- Prodsmart vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Prodsmart vs ABB 800xA
- Prodsmart vs AVEVA System Platform
- Prodsmart vs Hippo CMMS
- Prodsmart vs Protolabs
- Prodsmart vs Fictiv
- Prodsmart vs Paperless Parts
- Prodsmart vs Formlabs PreForm
- Prodsmart vs Markforged Eiger
- Prodsmart vs GrabCAD Print
- Prodsmart vs Materialise Magics
- Prodsmart vs Simplify3D
- Prodsmart vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Prodsmart vs JobBOSS²
- Prodsmart vs Duro PLM
- Prodsmart vs Dyndrite
- Prodsmart vs Erbessd Instruments
- Xometry vs Tulip
- Xometry vs MachineMetrics
- Xometry vs TrakSYS
- Xometry vs Authentise
- Xometry vs Oqton
- Xometry vs Flow Software
- Xometry vs QAD Redzone
- Xometry vs 3YOURMIND
- Xometry vs Sight Machine
- Xometry vs Guidewheel
- Xometry vs ProShop ERP
- Xometry vs Ignition
- Xometry vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Xometry vs LabVIEW
- Xometry vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Xometry vs ABB 800xA
- Xometry vs AVEVA System Platform
- Xometry vs Hippo CMMS
- Xometry vs Protolabs
- Xometry vs Fictiv
- Xometry vs Paperless Parts
- Xometry vs Formlabs PreForm
- Xometry vs Markforged Eiger
- Xometry vs GrabCAD Print
- Xometry vs Materialise Magics
- Xometry vs Simplify3D
- Xometry vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Xometry vs JobBOSS²
- Xometry vs Duro PLM
- Xometry vs Dyndrite
- Xometry vs Erbessd Instruments
