Manufacturing · head to head
AMFG vs Prodsmart

AMFG
Manufacturing
Automated quoting and production workflow software for machine shops and additive bureaus
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Prodsmart
Manufacturing
Mobile manufacturing execution for small plants, acquired by Autodesk and folded into Fusion Operations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AMFG no pricing is published in any form, and the product is sold by module and site, so total cost is invisible until you are several sales calls in.; Prodsmart the product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.
- They diverge on capability: AMFG covers Geometric auto-quoting, Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AMFG and Prodsmart actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AMFG
- Geometric auto-quoting
- 2D drawing analysis
- Production planning and scheduling
- Shop-floor control
- Quality tracking
- Customer portal
- CAD and CAM plugins
Only in Prodsmart
- Mobile shop floor declarations
- No controller integration required
- Traceability
- Live production status
- Basic OEE
- Maintenance records
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AMFG
- A machine shop losing work because quoting takes three days and competitors answer in three hoursnot Prodsmart
- An additive bureau that needs one system for order intake, build scheduling and traceability across several machinesnot Prodsmart
- A manufacturer running AM and CNC in the same facility and wanting one production record across bothnot Prodsmart
- Replacing an email and spreadsheet ordering process with a customer portal that produces priced quotes automaticallynot Prodsmart
Prodsmart
- A small manufacturer with older machines that cannot be connected to any network without a costly retrofitnot AMFG
- A plant that needs lot traceability for a customer or regulatory audit and currently keeps it on papernot AMFG
- A shop wanting live work order status without installing terminals and cabling on the floornot AMFG
- An Autodesk Fusion user looking for an operations layer from the same vendor as its CAD and CAMnot AMFG
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AMFG
- No pricing is published in any form, and the product is sold by module and site, so total cost is invisible until you are several sales calls in.
- Automated quoting only becomes accurate once your cost model, machine rates and material data are properly loaded, so the value arrives months after go-live and early quotes need human checking.
- The product started in additive manufacturing and has pivoted its marketing towards CNC machine shops, which means some CNC-specific depth is newer than the additive lineage and worth testing against your actual process mix.
- It overlaps heavily with ERP and MES scope, so shops with an existing ERP face an ownership decision over scheduling and customer records that is a political problem, not a technical one.
- It is a comparatively small vendor against established shop-floor systems, so integration work into an incumbent ERP will fall largely on you or a partner rather than on a pre-built certified connector.
Prodsmart
- The product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.
- All data originates from operator declarations, so accuracy depends entirely on shop floor discipline, and a plant that cannot enforce scanning gets confident charts built on incomplete input.
- Because it reads nothing from machines, it cannot detect a stoppage the operator does not report, which means downtime analysis captures what people admit to rather than what happened.
- Scheduling and planning are shallow compared with a full MES or ERP, so most customers still plan elsewhere and use Prodsmart for execution only.
- Support and account management now run through a very large software vendor, and small manufacturers frequently report longer response paths than they had with the original company.
Pricing, plan by plan
AMFG
On request- AMFG$undefined/year
- Automated quoting and estimating
- Production planning and scheduling
- Shop-floor control and quality tracking
Prodsmart
On request- Prodsmart (Autodesk Fusion Operations)$undefined/year
- Mobile shop floor execution
- Traceability and production reporting
- Sold within the Autodesk Fusion product family
Which should you pick?
Choose AMFG if
- You need geometric auto-quoting.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want 2d drawing analysis.
Choose Prodsmart if
- You need mobile shop floor declarations.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no controller integration required.
Questions people ask
- Is AMFG or Prodsmart better?
- Neither clearly leads. AMFG starts at On request and Prodsmart at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AMFG or Prodsmart?
- AMFG starts at On request and Prodsmart at On request.
- Does AMFG or Prodsmart run on more platforms?
- AMFG runs on Web, Cloud. Prodsmart runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is AMFG best used for?
- AMFG is most often used for a machine shop losing work because quoting takes three days and competitors answer in three hours, an additive bureau that needs one system for order intake, build scheduling and traceability across several machines, a manufacturer running am and cnc in the same facility and wanting one production record across both, replacing an email and spreadsheet ordering process with a customer portal that produces priced quotes automatically. Of those, a machine shop losing work because quoting takes three days and competitors answer in three hours and an additive bureau that needs one system for order intake, build scheduling and traceability across several machines are not what Prodsmart is typically brought in for.
- What can AMFG do that Prodsmart cannot?
- AMFG covers Geometric auto-quoting, 2D drawing analysis, Production planning and scheduling, Shop-floor control. Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations, No controller integration required, Traceability, Live production status.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AMFG: Does AMFG replace my ERP?
No. It covers quoting through shop-floor execution and quality. Finance, purchasing and inventory usually stay in the ERP, and you must decide which system owns scheduling.
Prodsmart: Who owns Prodsmart?
Autodesk acquired it in 2022 and has integrated it into the Fusion product family as its operations offering.
AMFG: Is it only for 3D printing?
No, though that is where it started. It now targets CNC machine shops as well and markets quoting for machining, sheet metal and additive.
Prodsmart: Does it need my machines to be connected?
No. That is the central design decision. Operators declare production on mobile devices.
AMFG: How accurate is automated quoting out of the box?
Not accurate until your machine rates, materials and cost model are configured. Treat the first months of quotes as assisted rather than automatic.
Prodsmart: Is it a full MES?
It covers execution, traceability and basic OEE. Detailed scheduling, quality workflows and controller level data are not its scope.
AMFG: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted by number of users, sites and selected modules.
Prodsmart: Can I still buy it as a standalone product?
It is sold through Autodesk. Confirm the current packaging and pricing with Autodesk rather than relying on pre acquisition material.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- AMFG vs Paperless Parts
- AMFG vs JobBOSS²
- AMFG vs 3YOURMIND
- AMFG vs Authentise
- AMFG vs Oqton
- AMFG vs Dyndrite
- AMFG vs Materialise Magics
- AMFG vs Autodesk Netfabb
- AMFG vs Fictiv
- AMFG vs Simplify3D
- AMFG vs Formlabs PreForm
- AMFG vs GrabCAD Print
- AMFG vs Kepware Server
- AMFG vs Litmus Edge
- AMFG vs Maintenance Connection
- AMFG vs Markforged Eiger
- AMFG vs MOVUS
- AMFG vs Tulip
- AMFG vs MachineMetrics
- AMFG vs TrakSYS
- AMFG vs Flow Software
- AMFG vs QAD Redzone
- AMFG vs Sight Machine
- AMFG vs Guidewheel
- AMFG vs ProShop ERP
- AMFG vs Ignition
- AMFG vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AMFG vs LabVIEW
- AMFG vs SKF Enlight Centre
- AMFG vs ABB 800xA
- AMFG vs AVEVA System Platform
- AMFG vs Hippo CMMS
- Prodsmart vs Paperless Parts
- Prodsmart vs JobBOSS²
- Prodsmart vs 3YOURMIND
- Prodsmart vs Authentise
- Prodsmart vs Oqton
- Prodsmart vs Dyndrite
- Prodsmart vs Materialise Magics
- Prodsmart vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Prodsmart vs Fictiv
- Prodsmart vs Simplify3D
- Prodsmart vs Formlabs PreForm
- Prodsmart vs GrabCAD Print
- Prodsmart vs Kepware Server
- Prodsmart vs Litmus Edge
- Prodsmart vs Maintenance Connection
- Prodsmart vs Markforged Eiger
- Prodsmart vs MOVUS
- Prodsmart vs Tulip
- Prodsmart vs MachineMetrics
- Prodsmart vs TrakSYS
- Prodsmart vs Flow Software
- Prodsmart vs QAD Redzone
- Prodsmart vs Sight Machine
- Prodsmart vs Guidewheel
- Prodsmart vs ProShop ERP
- Prodsmart vs Ignition
- Prodsmart vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Prodsmart vs LabVIEW
- Prodsmart vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Prodsmart vs ABB 800xA
- Prodsmart vs AVEVA System Platform
- Prodsmart vs Hippo CMMS
