Manufacturing · head to head
Fictiv vs OpenBOM

Fictiv
Manufacturing
On-demand custom manufacturing with instant CAD quoting, now owned by MISUMI
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fictiv this is a manufacturing service, not software you licence, so there is nothing to deploy or own and switching means re-sourcing parts rather than exporting data.; OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- They diverge on capability: Fictiv covers Instant CAD quoting, OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fictiv and OpenBOM actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fictiv
- Instant CAD quoting
- Design for manufacturing feedback
- Multi-region network
- Multiple processes
- Quality documentation
- Order and revision tracking
- Bridge to production
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fictiv
- An engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop firstnot OpenBOM
- Moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a suppliernot OpenBOM
- Bridge production between prototype tooling and a committed high-volume suppliernot OpenBOM
- Getting design-for-manufacturing feedback on a part before committing to injection mould toolingnot OpenBOM
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot Fictiv
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot Fictiv
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot Fictiv
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot Fictiv
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fictiv
- This is a manufacturing service, not software you licence, so there is nothing to deploy or own and switching means re-sourcing parts rather than exporting data.
- A broker sits between you and the shop cutting your part, so at stable production volumes direct sourcing usually beats the platform price and the platform knows it.
- You do not choose or generally know the specific supplier, which makes process control, supplier audits and traceability harder in regulated or aerospace work.
- MISUMI completed a $350 million acquisition in June 2025, so roadmap and pricing now answer to a Japanese industrial components group rather than to an independent platform strategy.
- Instant quotes are geometry-driven and complex or tightly toleranced parts drop into engineer review, so the speed advantage that justified the choice disappears exactly on the parts that are hardest to source.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fictiv
On request- Per-part quoting$undefined/month
- No subscription or platform fee
- Priced per part by geometry, material, process and quantity
- Instant quotes for many processes, engineer review for complex parts
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
Which should you pick?
Choose Fictiv if
- You need instant cad quoting.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want design for manufacturing feedback.
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Questions people ask
- Is Fictiv or OpenBOM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fictiv starts at On request and OpenBOM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fictiv or OpenBOM?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Fictiv and Free for OpenBOM.
- Does Fictiv or OpenBOM run on more platforms?
- Fictiv runs on Web, Cloud. OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Fictiv starts at On request.
- What is Fictiv best used for?
- Fictiv is most often used for an engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop first, moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a supplier, bridge production between prototype tooling and a committed high-volume supplier, getting design-for-manufacturing feedback on a part before committing to injection mould tooling. Of those, an engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop first and moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a supplier are not what OpenBOM is typically brought in for.
- What can Fictiv do that OpenBOM cannot?
- Fictiv covers Instant CAD quoting, Design for manufacturing feedback, Multi-region network, Multiple processes. OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fictiv: Is Fictiv software I can buy?
No. It is an on-demand manufacturing service with a quoting and order management platform. You pay for parts, not for the software.
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
Fictiv: Is Fictiv still independent?
No. MISUMI Group completed its acquisition, valued at $350 million, in June 2025. Fictiv continues to trade under its own name.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
Fictiv: Do I know which factory makes my part?
Generally not. Fictiv manages a vetted network and allocates work within it, which is a limitation if your quality system requires named and audited suppliers.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
Fictiv: Is it cheaper than sourcing directly?
For prototypes and low volumes, usually yes once you count the cost of finding and qualifying a supplier. At stable production volumes, direct sourcing is normally cheaper.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fictiv vs SolidWorks
- Fictiv vs Xometry
- Fictiv vs Protolabs
- Fictiv vs AMFG
- Fictiv vs Materialise Magics
- Fictiv vs Oqton
- Fictiv vs Simplify3D
- Fictiv vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Fictiv vs Formlabs PreForm
- Fictiv vs GrabCAD Print
- Fictiv vs Markforged Eiger
- Fictiv vs KCF Technologies
- Fictiv vs MOVUS
- Fictiv vs Oden Technologies
- Fictiv vs Fusion 360
- Fictiv vs Aras Innovator
- Fictiv vs Duro PLM
- Fictiv vs PTC Windchill
- Fictiv vs Propel
- Fictiv vs Ignition
- Fictiv vs Seeq
- Fictiv vs AVEVA System Platform
- Fictiv vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Fictiv vs Authentise
- Fictiv vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Fictiv vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs Xometry
- OpenBOM vs Protolabs
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs Oqton
- OpenBOM vs Simplify3D
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Formlabs PreForm
- OpenBOM vs GrabCAD Print
- OpenBOM vs Markforged Eiger
- OpenBOM vs KCF Technologies
- OpenBOM vs MOVUS
- OpenBOM vs Oden Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
