Manufacturing · head to head
Materialise Magics vs Prodsmart

Materialise Magics
Manufacturing
Industrial build preparation and data repair for metal and polymer additive manufacturing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Prodsmart
Manufacturing
Mobile manufacturing execution for small plants, acquired by Autodesk and folded into Fusion Operations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Materialise Magics new seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.; Prodsmart the product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.
- They diverge on capability: Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Materialise Magics and Prodsmart actually diverge.
| Attribute | Materialise Magics | Prodsmart |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Materialise Magics
- Mesh repair
- Part orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build Processors
- Simulation module
- Structures module
- Reporting and traceability
Only in Prodsmart
- Mobile shop floor declarations
- No controller integration required
- Traceability
- Live production status
- Basic OEE
- Maintenance records
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Materialise Magics
- A service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicersnot Prodsmart
- Repairing badly formed STL or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not acceptnot Prodsmart
- Automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the processnot Prodsmart
- Simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal buildnot Prodsmart
Prodsmart
- A small manufacturer with older machines that cannot be connected to any network without a costly retrofitnot Materialise Magics
- A plant that needs lot traceability for a customer or regulatory audit and currently keeps it on papernot Materialise Magics
- A shop wanting live work order status without installing terminals and cabling on the floornot Materialise Magics
- An Autodesk Fusion user looking for an operations layer from the same vendor as its CAD and CAMnot Materialise Magics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Materialise Magics
- New seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.
- Build Processors are licensed separately per machine family, so adding a new printer brand adds a licence line as well as capital cost, and a mixed fleet multiplies the software bill.
- The modules that deliver the biggest labour saving, notably e-Stage automated support generation, are paid extras, so the base seat alone leaves you doing manual support work.
- Materialise publishes no prices anywhere, and quotes vary by region and reseller, so two similar bureaus can pay materially different amounts for the same configuration.
- It is Windows only and remains a desktop application, which sits awkwardly with the cloud direction of Materialise CO-AM and means preparation capacity is tied to specific workstations and licence seats.
Prodsmart
- The product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.
- All data originates from operator declarations, so accuracy depends entirely on shop floor discipline, and a plant that cannot enforce scanning gets confident charts built on incomplete input.
- Because it reads nothing from machines, it cannot detect a stoppage the operator does not report, which means downtime analysis captures what people admit to rather than what happened.
- Scheduling and planning are shallow compared with a full MES or ERP, so most customers still plan elsewhere and use Prodsmart for execution only.
- Support and account management now run through a very large software vendor, and small manufacturers frequently report longer response paths than they had with the original company.
Pricing, plan by plan
Materialise Magics
On request- Magics Essentials$undefined/year
- Mesh repair and editing
- Part orientation and platform placement
- Basic support generation
- Magics with modules$undefined/year
- Everything in Essentials
- e-Stage automated supports, Simulation, Structures priced individually
- Build Processors licensed per machine family
Prodsmart
On request- Prodsmart (Autodesk Fusion Operations)$undefined/year
- Mobile shop floor execution
- Traceability and production reporting
- Sold within the Autodesk Fusion product family
Which should you pick?
Choose Materialise Magics if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want part orientation and nesting.
Choose Prodsmart if
- You need mobile shop floor declarations.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no controller integration required.
Questions people ask
- Is Materialise Magics or Prodsmart better?
- Neither clearly leads. Materialise Magics starts at On request and Prodsmart at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Materialise Magics or Prodsmart?
- Materialise Magics starts at On request and Prodsmart at On request.
- Does Materialise Magics or Prodsmart run on more platforms?
- Materialise Magics runs on Windows. Prodsmart runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Materialise Magics best used for?
- Materialise Magics is most often used for a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers, repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept, automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the process, simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal build. Of those, a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers and repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept are not what Prodsmart is typically brought in for.
- What can Materialise Magics do that Prodsmart cannot?
- Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Part orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build Processors. Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations, No controller integration required, Traceability, Live production status.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Materialise Magics: Can I still buy a perpetual Magics licence?
No. Since 15 May 2024 Materialise sells new seats and new modules on subscription only. Existing perpetual licences continue to work but new capacity is subscription.
Prodsmart: Who owns Prodsmart?
Autodesk acquired it in 2022 and has integrated it into the Fusion product family as its operations offering.
Materialise Magics: Do I need a separate Build Processor for each printer?
You need one per machine family, licensed separately from the Magics seat. Budget for it before you buy the printer.
Prodsmart: Does it need my machines to be connected?
No. That is the central design decision. Operators declare production on mobile devices.
Materialise Magics: Is Magics the same as CO-AM?
No. Magics is desktop build preparation. CO-AM is the Materialise cloud platform for AM workflow and production management, which absorbed the former Link3D product.
Prodsmart: Is it a full MES?
It covers execution, traceability and basic OEE. Detailed scheduling, quality workflows and controller level data are not its scope.
Materialise Magics: Does Magics slice?
It prepares and supports the build and hands off through a Build Processor, which produces the machine-ready file. The machine-specific processing lives in the Build Processor.
Prodsmart: Can I still buy it as a standalone product?
It is sold through Autodesk. Confirm the current packaging and pricing with Autodesk rather than relying on pre acquisition material.
Related pages
More on Materialise Magics
Other head to heads
- Materialise Magics vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Materialise Magics vs Oqton
- Materialise Magics vs GrabCAD Print
- Materialise Magics vs Formlabs PreForm
- Materialise Magics vs Simplify3D
- Materialise Magics vs Markforged Eiger
- Materialise Magics vs SolidWorks
- Materialise Magics vs AVEVA System Platform
- Materialise Magics vs 3YOURMIND
- Materialise Magics vs Aras Innovator
- Materialise Magics vs Authentise
- Materialise Magics vs Dyndrite
- Materialise Magics vs QAD Redzone
- Materialise Magics vs Seeq
- Materialise Magics vs Sensemore
- Materialise Magics vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Materialise Magics vs TrendMiner
- Materialise Magics vs Tulip
- Materialise Magics vs MachineMetrics
- Materialise Magics vs TrakSYS
- Materialise Magics vs Flow Software
- Materialise Magics vs Sight Machine
- Materialise Magics vs Guidewheel
- Materialise Magics vs ProShop ERP
- Materialise Magics vs Ignition
- Materialise Magics vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Materialise Magics vs LabVIEW
- Materialise Magics vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Materialise Magics vs ABB 800xA
- Materialise Magics vs Hippo CMMS
- Prodsmart vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Prodsmart vs Oqton
- Prodsmart vs GrabCAD Print
- Prodsmart vs Formlabs PreForm
- Prodsmart vs Simplify3D
- Prodsmart vs Markforged Eiger
- Prodsmart vs SolidWorks
- Prodsmart vs AVEVA System Platform
- Prodsmart vs 3YOURMIND
- Prodsmart vs Aras Innovator
- Prodsmart vs Authentise
- Prodsmart vs Dyndrite
- Prodsmart vs QAD Redzone
- Prodsmart vs Seeq
- Prodsmart vs Sensemore
- Prodsmart vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Prodsmart vs TrendMiner
- Prodsmart vs Tulip
- Prodsmart vs MachineMetrics
- Prodsmart vs TrakSYS
- Prodsmart vs Flow Software
- Prodsmart vs Sight Machine
- Prodsmart vs Guidewheel
- Prodsmart vs ProShop ERP
- Prodsmart vs Ignition
- Prodsmart vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Prodsmart vs LabVIEW
- Prodsmart vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Prodsmart vs ABB 800xA
- Prodsmart vs Hippo CMMS
