Manufacturing · head to head
ABB 800xA vs Fictiv
ABB 800xA
Manufacturing
Distributed control system and process automation platform for continuous and hybrid process plants
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
Fictiv
Manufacturing
On-demand custom manufacturing with instant CAD quoting, now owned by MISUMI
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ABB 800xA licensing is by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients, and none of it is published, so two plants of similar size can be quoted very differently with no external benchmark to argue against.; Fictiv this is a manufacturing service, not software you licence, so there is nothing to deploy or own and switching means re-sourcing parts rather than exporting data.
- They diverge on capability: ABB 800xA covers Extended Automation, Fictiv covers Instant CAD quoting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ABB 800xA and Fictiv actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ABB 800xA
- Extended Automation
- AC 800M controllers
- Connectivity servers
- Safety integration
- IEC 61850 electrical
- Batch management
- Information management
- Asset optimisation
Only in Fictiv
- Instant CAD quoting
- Design for manufacturing feedback
- Multi-region network
- Multiple processes
- Quality documentation
- Order and revision tracking
- Bridge to production
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ABB 800xA
- A refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in placenot Fictiv
- A pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplacenot Fictiv
- A mining operation that needs SIL 3 safety functions on the same network as process control rather than a separate safety systemnot Fictiv
- A marine or offshore platform where ABB already supplies the electrical distribution and IEC 61850 integration removes a second systemnot Fictiv
Fictiv
- An engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop firstnot ABB 800xA
- Moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a suppliernot ABB 800xA
- Bridge production between prototype tooling and a committed high-volume suppliernot ABB 800xA
- Getting design-for-manufacturing feedback on a part before committing to injection mould toolingnot ABB 800xA
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ABB 800xA
- Licensing is by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients, and none of it is published, so two plants of similar size can be quoted very differently with no external benchmark to argue against.
- Engineering and commissioning typically cost more than the software and controller hardware together, and that share is not visible in the initial ABB quotation, which prices the system rather than the project.
- It is Windows only for servers and workplaces, so the operating system lifecycle drives forced upgrade cycles that have nothing to do with your process.
- Once configured, the aspect object model and the specific integrator conventions used make handing the system to a different service provider expensive; ABB service contracts are effectively sticky.
- Software maintenance is an annual contract on top of the licence and lapsing it means you cannot take version upgrades, so the system quietly ages out of security support if the plant skips renewals to save money.
Fictiv
- This is a manufacturing service, not software you licence, so there is nothing to deploy or own and switching means re-sourcing parts rather than exporting data.
- A broker sits between you and the shop cutting your part, so at stable production volumes direct sourcing usually beats the platform price and the platform knows it.
- You do not choose or generally know the specific supplier, which makes process control, supplier audits and traceability harder in regulated or aerospace work.
- MISUMI completed a $350 million acquisition in June 2025, so roadmap and pricing now answer to a Japanese industrial components group rather than to an independent platform strategy.
- Instant quotes are geometry-driven and complex or tightly toleranced parts drop into engineer review, so the speed advantage that justified the choice disappears exactly on the parts that are hardest to source.
Pricing, plan by plan
ABB 800xA
On request- ABB Ability System 800xA$undefined/year
- Licensed by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients
- Sold as a project through ABB or a certified partner
- Annual software maintenance contract priced separately
Fictiv
On request- Per-part quoting$undefined/month
- No subscription or platform fee
- Priced per part by geometry, material, process and quantity
- Instant quotes for many processes, engineer review for complex parts
Which should you pick?
Choose ABB 800xA if
- You need extended automation.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want ac 800m controllers.
Choose Fictiv if
- You need instant cad quoting.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want design for manufacturing feedback.
Questions people ask
- Is ABB 800xA or Fictiv better?
- Neither clearly leads. ABB 800xA starts at On request and Fictiv at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ABB 800xA or Fictiv?
- ABB 800xA starts at On request and Fictiv at On request.
- Does ABB 800xA or Fictiv run on more platforms?
- ABB 800xA runs on Windows. Fictiv runs on Web, Cloud.
- What is ABB 800xA best used for?
- ABB 800xA is most often used for a refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in place, a pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplace, a mining operation that needs sil 3 safety functions on the same network as process control rather than a separate safety system, a marine or offshore platform where abb already supplies the electrical distribution and iec 61850 integration removes a second system. Of those, a refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in place and a pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplace are not what Fictiv is typically brought in for.
- What can ABB 800xA do that Fictiv cannot?
- ABB 800xA covers Extended Automation, AC 800M controllers, Connectivity servers, Safety integration. Fictiv covers Instant CAD quoting, Design for manufacturing feedback, Multi-region network, Multiple processes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ABB 800xA: Is 800xA sold as a perpetual licence?
Yes, the system licence is perpetual, but a separate annual software maintenance agreement is required to receive updates and version upgrades.
Fictiv: Is Fictiv software I can buy?
No. It is an on-demand manufacturing service with a quoting and order management platform. You pay for parts, not for the software.
ABB 800xA: Can 800xA control non-ABB field hardware?
Yes. Connectivity servers front third-party PLC and DCS systems and legacy ABB families, which is the main reason it wins brownfield projects.
Fictiv: Is Fictiv still independent?
No. MISUMI Group completed its acquisition, valued at $350 million, in June 2025. Fictiv continues to trade under its own name.
ABB 800xA: Does it replace a separate electrical SCADA?
It can. IEC 61850 substation integration is native, so many plants drop a separate electrical monitoring system.
Fictiv: Do I know which factory makes my part?
Generally not. Fictiv manages a vetted network and allocates work within it, which is a limitation if your quality system requires named and audited suppliers.
ABB 800xA: What is the realistic implementation timeline?
A full plant migration is measured in years, not months; phased cutovers of one unit at a time are the norm.
Fictiv: Is it cheaper than sourcing directly?
For prototypes and low volumes, usually yes once you count the cost of finding and qualifying a supplier. At stable production volumes, direct sourcing is normally cheaper.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- ABB 800xA vs AVEVA System Platform
- ABB 800xA vs Ignition
- ABB 800xA vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- ABB 800xA vs GENESIS Version 11
- ABB 800xA vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- ABB 800xA vs COPA-DATA zenon
- ABB 800xA vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- ABB 800xA vs Authentise
- ABB 800xA vs Kepware Server
- ABB 800xA vs QAD Redzone
- ABB 800xA vs Samotics
- ABB 800xA vs Sight Machine
- ABB 800xA vs Simplify3D
- ABB 800xA vs TrendMiner
- ABB 800xA vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- ABB 800xA vs Xometry
- ABB 800xA vs SolidWorks
- ABB 800xA vs Protolabs
- ABB 800xA vs AMFG
- ABB 800xA vs Materialise Magics
- ABB 800xA vs Oqton
- ABB 800xA vs Autodesk Netfabb
- ABB 800xA vs Formlabs PreForm
- ABB 800xA vs GrabCAD Print
- ABB 800xA vs Markforged Eiger
- ABB 800xA vs KCF Technologies
- ABB 800xA vs MOVUS
- ABB 800xA vs Oden Technologies
- ABB 800xA vs OpenBOM
- Fictiv vs AVEVA System Platform
- Fictiv vs Ignition
- Fictiv vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Fictiv vs GENESIS Version 11
- Fictiv vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Fictiv vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Fictiv vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Fictiv vs Authentise
- Fictiv vs Kepware Server
- Fictiv vs QAD Redzone
- Fictiv vs Samotics
- Fictiv vs Sight Machine
- Fictiv vs Simplify3D
- Fictiv vs TrendMiner
- Fictiv vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Fictiv vs Xometry
- Fictiv vs SolidWorks
- Fictiv vs Protolabs
- Fictiv vs AMFG
- Fictiv vs Materialise Magics
- Fictiv vs Oqton
- Fictiv vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Fictiv vs Formlabs PreForm
- Fictiv vs GrabCAD Print
- Fictiv vs Markforged Eiger
- Fictiv vs KCF Technologies
- Fictiv vs MOVUS
- Fictiv vs Oden Technologies
- Fictiv vs OpenBOM