Maps · head to head
Atlas.co vs PositionStack

Atlas.co
Maps
Browser-based collaborative GIS with published per-seat pricing and a free tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

PositionStack
Maps
Free, developer-friendly geocoding API for forward and reverse geocoding with global coverage
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Atlas.co has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Atlas.co analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.; PositionStack the free plan allows only 100 requests per month
- They diverge on capability: Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, PositionStack covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlas.co and PositionStack actually diverge.
| Attribute | Atlas.co | PositionStack |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | Unknown |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlas.co
- Browser GIS
- Workflow builder
- Geocoding
- Collaboration
- Data import
- Cheap viewer seats
- Export and embed
- AI credits
Only in PositionStack
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlas.co
- A renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no GIS analyst availablenot PositionStack
- A planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only GIS licencesnot PositionStack
- A consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop GIS installs across a distributed teamnot PositionStack
- An analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop GISnot PositionStack
PositionStack
- Forward geocoding addresses to coordinates via REST APInot Atlas.co
- Reverse geocoding coordinates to addressesnot Atlas.co
- Batch geocoding location data in a backend servicenot Atlas.co
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlas.co
- Analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.
- Geocoding and workflow runs are metered per tier, and a single large address batch can exhaust a month’s Pro allowance in one afternoon, forcing an upgrade for a one-off job.
- The company is at pre-seed stage with roughly $2m raised and a small team, so buyers embedding it in a business process carry meaningful continuity risk.
- Annual billing is required to get the advertised prices, which removes the flexibility that would otherwise make a young vendor a low-risk trial.
- There is no offline or field capability at all, so any organisation whose spatial work includes data collection needs a second tool alongside it.
PositionStack
- The free plan allows only 100 requests per month
- The free plan is a personal licence, so commercial use requires a paid plan
- The free plan is rate limited, with an extended rate limit only from the Basic plan up
- Requests beyond the monthly quota are billed as overage, at $0.0003996 per request on Basic
- The lowest advertised rates require annual prepayment
- Enterprise volumes are priced by quote with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlas.co
Free- StarterFree
- 3 projects
- 3 editors
- 1 GB storage
- Pro$23/month
- 10 projects
- 10 GB storage
- 10,000 geocoding runs
- Team$72/month
- Unlimited projects
- Viewer seats at $7 per month
- 25,000 geocoding runs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited storage and workflows
- 100,000 geocoding runs
- White-labelled embeds
PositionStack
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the PositionStack review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlas.co if
- You need browser gis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want workflow builder.
Choose PositionStack if
- You need core functionality.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlas.co or PositionStack better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlas.co starts at Free and PositionStack at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlas.co or PositionStack?
- Atlas.co has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Atlas.co and On request for PositionStack.
- Does Atlas.co or PositionStack run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Atlas.co for free?
- Yes. Atlas.co has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. PositionStack starts at On request.
- What is Atlas.co best used for?
- Atlas.co is most often used for a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available, a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences, a consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop gis installs across a distributed team, an analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop gis. Of those, a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available and a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences are not what PositionStack is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlas.co do that PositionStack cannot?
- Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Workflow builder, Geocoding, Collaboration. PositionStack covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlas.co: How much does Atlas.co cost?
Starter is free, Pro is $23 per user per month and Team is $72 per editor per month with viewers at $7, all billed annually. Enterprise is quoted.
PositionStack: What annual billing discount does Positionstack offer?
Annual billing provides up to 15% discount compared to monthly billing total. For example, Basic annual is $8.99/month vs $9.99/month monthly, and Professional annual is $43.99/month vs $49.99/month monthly. Source: https://positionstack.com/pricing
SourceAtlas.co: Can it replace ArcGIS or QGIS?
For visualisation, light analysis and sharing, often yes. For raster, network or geodetic work, no.
PositionStack: How do Positionstack overage notifications work?
Positionstack sends alerts at 75%, 90%, and 100% of your monthly request allowance. Overages are calculated at month-end and charged according to each tier's per-request rate (e.g., Business tier: $0.00013332/request). Source: https://positionstack.com/pricing
SourceAtlas.co: What is the viewer seat?
A read-only seat at $7 per month on the Team plan, intended for stakeholders who consume maps rather than build them.
PositionStack: What payment methods does Positionstack accept?
Positionstack accepts Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express, Diner's Club for monthly billing. Enterprise customers may arrange bank transfers for their custom agreements. Source: https://positionstack.com/pricing
SourceAtlas.co: Where is the company based?
Oslo, Norway. It was founded in 2021 and has raised around $2m in pre-seed funding.
PositionStack: Can I downgrade or cancel my Positionstack plan?
Downgrades take effect at your billing cycle end. Cancellations require contacting customer service. Uptime guarantee is 99.9% average over 12 months. Source: https://positionstack.com/pricing
SourceAtlas.co: Is there a free tier?
Yes, Starter gives three projects, three editors and 1 GB of storage with metered geocoding and workflow runs.
Related pages
More on PositionStack
Other head to heads
- Atlas.co vs Esri ArcGIS
- Atlas.co vs CARTO
- Atlas.co vs QGIS
- Atlas.co vs Felt
- Atlas.co vs Correlator3D
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Atlas.co vs Global Mapper
- Atlas.co vs GRASS GIS
- Atlas.co vs Fused
- Atlas.co vs deck.gl
- Atlas.co vs Ride with GPS
- Atlas.co vs Kepler.gl
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Places API
- Atlas.co vs Geoapify
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps
- Atlas.co vs Leica Infinity
- Atlas.co vs Mapbox
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps Platform
- Atlas.co vs HERE Technologies
- Atlas.co vs Apple Maps
- Atlas.co vs LocationIQ
- Atlas.co vs Nominatim
- Atlas.co vs Stadia Maps
- Atlas.co vs Leaflet
- Atlas.co vs CesiumJS
- Atlas.co vs Gaia GPS
- Atlas.co vs Agisoft Metashape
- Atlas.co vs Emlid Studio
- Atlas.co vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Atlas.co vs Geographic Calculator
- PositionStack vs Esri ArcGIS
- PositionStack vs CARTO
- PositionStack vs QGIS
- PositionStack vs Felt
- PositionStack vs Correlator3D
- PositionStack vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- PositionStack vs Global Mapper
- PositionStack vs GRASS GIS
- PositionStack vs Fused
- PositionStack vs deck.gl
- PositionStack vs Ride with GPS
- PositionStack vs Kepler.gl
- PositionStack vs Foursquare Places API
- PositionStack vs Geoapify
- PositionStack vs Google Maps
- PositionStack vs Leica Infinity
- PositionStack vs Mapbox
- PositionStack vs Google Maps Platform
- PositionStack vs HERE Technologies
- PositionStack vs Apple Maps
- PositionStack vs LocationIQ
- PositionStack vs Nominatim
- PositionStack vs Stadia Maps
- PositionStack vs Leaflet
- PositionStack vs CesiumJS
- PositionStack vs Gaia GPS
- PositionStack vs Agisoft Metashape
- PositionStack vs Emlid Studio
- PositionStack vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- PositionStack vs Geographic Calculator
