CRM · head to head
EspoCRM vs Matomo

EspoCRM
CRM
AGPL open source CRM in PHP that you can self-host free or buy as cloud with seat minimums
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: EspoCRM the AGPLv3 licence obliges you to publish source modifications if you make the modified software available over a network, which blocks resellers who want to offer a customised hosted version without opening their code.; Matomo the self hosted Community Edition is free but excludes A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, cohorts, crash analytics and multi channel attribution, all of which are paid plugins
- They diverge on capability: EspoCRM covers Entity manager, Matomo covers Web analytics.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which EspoCRM and Matomo actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in EspoCRM
- Entity manager
- Dynamic logic
- Email integration
- Sales pipeline
- Case management
- Reports and dashboards
- Workflow automation
- REST API
Only in Matomo
- Web analytics
- Real-time reports
- Custom dimensions
- Goal tracking
- E-commerce tracking
- Google Search Console
- Privacy-focused
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
EspoCRM
- A small business that wants a CRM on its own hosting with no per-seat fee and no vendor holding its customer datanot Matomo
- A public sector or healthcare team with data residency rules that rule out US-hosted commercial CRMnot Matomo
- A developer or agency needing a CRM whose data model can be extended into a bespoke entity structure through configurationnot Matomo
- An organisation with many light users, where self-hosting avoids paying seat prices for people who open the CRM twice a monthnot Matomo
Matomo
- Privacy focused web analytics as an alternative to Google Analyticsnot EspoCRM
- Self hosting analytics so visitor data stays on owned infrastructurenot EspoCRM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
EspoCRM
- The AGPLv3 licence obliges you to publish source modifications if you make the modified software available over a network, which blocks resellers who want to offer a customised hosted version without opening their code.
- Cloud plans carry seat minimums of three, five and ten users, so a two-person consultancy pays for three seats and a small team wanting the Ultimate features pays for ten.
- Record ceilings are real on the cheaper cloud tiers, with Basic capped at 100,000 records, and hitting the cap means a tier upgrade rather than a small overage charge.
- Marketing automation, sequences and native telephony are thin compared with HubSpot or Zoho, so most deployments end up wiring in a separate mailing tool and a separate dialler.
- Self-hosting shifts the entire cost to your own team: PHP version upgrades, database backups and security patching are yours, and a neglected instance becomes an internet-facing liability holding your customer list.
Matomo
- The self hosted Community Edition is free but excludes A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, cohorts, crash analytics and multi channel attribution, all of which are paid plugins
- Premium plugin bundles for self hosted installs run from 275 EUR a month for 4 users to 3,400 EUR for 50
- Cloud pricing is banded by monthly hits, and anything above 10 million requires contacting sales
- Self hosting places all operation and upgrades on the operator while still needing paid plugins for the advanced features
Pricing, plan by plan
EspoCRM
Free- Self-hostedFree
- AGPLv3 licence, no fee
- Runs on PHP with MySQL or MariaDB
- Advanced Pack, Sales Pack and other extensions sold separately as one-off purchases
- Cloud Basic$15/month
- Three-user minimum
- 3GB storage per user
- Up to 100,000 records
- Cloud Enterprise$25/month
- Five-user minimum
- 10GB storage per user
- Up to 10 million records, extendable for a fee
- Cloud Ultimate$69/month
- Ten-user minimum
- 400GB total storage
- Unlimited records
Matomo
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Open-source
- Full analytics
- Privacy-focused
Which should you pick?
Choose EspoCRM if
- You need entity manager.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, iOS, Android.
- You also want dynamic logic.
Choose Matomo if
- You need web analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, On-premise.
- You also want real-time reports.
Questions people ask
- Is EspoCRM or Matomo better?
- Neither clearly leads. EspoCRM starts at Free and Matomo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, EspoCRM or Matomo?
- EspoCRM starts at Free and Matomo at Free.
- Does EspoCRM or Matomo run on more platforms?
- EspoCRM runs on Web, Linux, Docker, iOS, Android. Matomo runs on Web, On-premise.
- Can I use EspoCRM for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is EspoCRM best used for?
- EspoCRM is most often used for a small business that wants a crm on its own hosting with no per-seat fee and no vendor holding its customer data, a public sector or healthcare team with data residency rules that rule out us-hosted commercial crm, a developer or agency needing a crm whose data model can be extended into a bespoke entity structure through configuration, an organisation with many light users, where self-hosting avoids paying seat prices for people who open the crm twice a month. Of those, a small business that wants a crm on its own hosting with no per-seat fee and no vendor holding its customer data and a public sector or healthcare team with data residency rules that rule out us-hosted commercial crm are not what Matomo is typically brought in for.
- What can EspoCRM do that Matomo cannot?
- EspoCRM covers Entity manager, Dynamic logic, Email integration, Sales pipeline. Matomo covers Web analytics, Real-time reports, Custom dimensions, Goal tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
EspoCRM: Is the self-hosted version really full featured?
The core CRM is, but several paid extension packs including Advanced Pack for reports and BPM are sold separately as one-off purchases and are not in the free download.
Matomo: How much does Matomo cost?
Matomo Cloud starts at EUR 29 per month for the Starter plan, which covers 50,000 hits per month. Matomo On-Premise has a free Community edition, with paid bundles from EUR 275 per month for up to 5M hits and 4 users.
SourceEspoCRM: What are the cloud seat minimums?
Three users on Basic, five on Enterprise and ten on Ultimate, so the advertised per-user rate is not the smallest bill you can pay.
Matomo: Is Matomo free?
The On-Premise Community edition is free forever with unlimited users and hits, supported through the forum only. Matomo Cloud is a paid service, though a free trial with access to all core features is offered.
SourceEspoCRM: What does it need to run?
PHP, MySQL or MariaDB and a web server. It installs on ordinary shared hosting or a small VPS, which is unusual for a modern CRM.
Matomo: What is the difference between Matomo Cloud and On-Premise?
Cloud plans include hosting, maintenance, automatic updates and daily backups, priced by monthly hits from EUR 29. On-Premise is self-hosted, free in its Community edition, with paid bundles adding support and higher user counts.
SourceEspoCRM: Can I move from cloud to self-hosted later?
Yes. EspoCRM states customers own their database and data files, so an export and reinstall is possible, though you take on all maintenance when you do.
Matomo: How many hits do the Matomo On-Premise bundles cover?
The Team bundle covers up to 5M hits per month and 4 users at EUR 275 per month. Business covers up to 30M hits and 20 users at EUR 1,450. Enterprise covers up to 100M hits and 50 users at EUR 3,400.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- EspoCRM vs Vtiger
- EspoCRM vs Zoho CRM
- EspoCRM vs Krayin
- EspoCRM vs SuiteCRM
- EspoCRM vs Twenty
- EspoCRM vs SugarCRM
- EspoCRM vs Salesflare
- EspoCRM vs Kylas
- EspoCRM vs Solid Performers
- EspoCRM vs Woodpecker
- EspoCRM vs Apptivo
- EspoCRM vs Corefactors AI CRM
- EspoCRM vs Capsule
- EspoCRM vs Capsule CRM
- EspoCRM vs Copper
- EspoCRM vs Insightly
- EspoCRM vs Streak
- EspoCRM vs Umami
- EspoCRM vs Crazy Egg
- EspoCRM vs Ruler Analytics
- EspoCRM vs VWO
- EspoCRM vs Northbeam
- EspoCRM vs Countly
- EspoCRM vs Fathom Analytics
- EspoCRM vs Mautic
- EspoCRM vs Attribution
- EspoCRM vs Plausible
- EspoCRM vs Freshpaint
- EspoCRM vs Simple Analytics
- EspoCRM vs Mailgun
- EspoCRM vs Triple Whale
- EspoCRM vs Adobe Analytics
- EspoCRM vs Adverity
- EspoCRM vs Bloomreach
- EspoCRM vs CallRail
- Matomo vs Vtiger
- Matomo vs Zoho CRM
- Matomo vs Krayin
- Matomo vs SuiteCRM
- Matomo vs Twenty
- Matomo vs SugarCRM
- Matomo vs Salesflare
- Matomo vs Kylas
- Matomo vs Solid Performers
- Matomo vs Woodpecker
- Matomo vs Apptivo
- Matomo vs Corefactors AI CRM
- Matomo vs Capsule
- Matomo vs Capsule CRM
- Matomo vs Copper
- Matomo vs Insightly
- Matomo vs Streak
- Matomo vs Umami
- Matomo vs Crazy Egg
- Matomo vs Ruler Analytics
- Matomo vs VWO
- Matomo vs Northbeam
- Matomo vs Countly
- Matomo vs Fathom Analytics
- Matomo vs Mautic
- Matomo vs Attribution
- Matomo vs Plausible
- Matomo vs Freshpaint
- Matomo vs Simple Analytics
- Matomo vs Mailgun
- Matomo vs Triple Whale
- Matomo vs Adobe Analytics
- Matomo vs Adverity
- Matomo vs Bloomreach
- Matomo vs CallRail

