Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs GovQA

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; GovQA pricing not published on vendor website; government contracting and custom quote model obscures list pricing
- They diverge on capability: Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, GovQA covers FOIA Management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and GovQA actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | GovQA |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | $400/month |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | Unknown | 1999 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in GovQA
- FOIA Management
- Subpoena Processing
- e-Discovery
- Constituent Portal
- Reporting
- Document Management
- Court Systems
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot GovQA
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot GovQA
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot GovQA
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot GovQA
GovQA
- Public records request management and legal compliance automationnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Digital communication delivery to residents and constituentsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Service request management for government agencies and local departmentsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Agenda and meeting management for city councils and boardsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Business licensing and permitting workflow automationnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
GovQA
- Pricing not published on vendor website; government contracting and custom quote model obscures list pricing
- Requires booking a demo to learn pricing and deployment options
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
GovQA
$400/month- Request Management$400/month
- FOIA Management
- e-Discovery
- Constituent Portal
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or GovQA better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and GovQA at $400/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or GovQA?
- Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and GovQA at $400/month.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or GovQA run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. GovQA runs on Web.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what GovQA is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that GovQA cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login. GovQA covers FOIA Management, Subpoena Processing, e-Discovery, Constituent Portal.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
GovQA: What does GovQA (formerly Granicus) cost?
Granicus does not display pricing on its website. The vendor requires customers to schedule a demo or contact sales to receive cost estimates.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
GovQA: Does Granicus offer Government Experience Agent (GXA) pricing separately?
Granicus lists Government Experience Agent as a feature of its Government Experience Cloud platform, but separate licensing costs are not published.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
GovQA: How many users can access Granicus services under one license?
Granicus does not specify user seat counts, unlimited user models, or per-agency pricing on its website. Licensing terms vary by government size and jurisdiction.
SourceRelated pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Accela
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs CivicPlus
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs DocuWare
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs NextRequest
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs MuckRock
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ArchiveSocial
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs GovPilot
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Laserfiche
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs CityView
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs PublicInput
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Axon Records
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Mark43
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Vigilant Solutions
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Workday Government
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Zencity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Polco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs RecDesk
- GovQA vs Cisco Duo
- GovQA vs JumpCloud
- GovQA vs Ping Identity
- GovQA vs Frontegg
- GovQA vs Authelia
- GovQA vs Beyond Identity
- GovQA vs Transmit Security
- GovQA vs Akeyless
- GovQA vs authentik
- GovQA vs Logto
- GovQA vs Speakeasy
- GovQA vs Authy
- GovQA vs ExpressVPN
- GovQA vs Falco
- GovQA vs Fenergo
- GovQA vs Google Authenticator
- GovQA vs Grype
- GovQA vs Hanwha Vision
- GovQA vs Accela
- GovQA vs CivicPlus
- GovQA vs DocuWare
- GovQA vs NextRequest
- GovQA vs MuckRock
- GovQA vs ArchiveSocial
- GovQA vs GovPilot
- GovQA vs Laserfiche
- GovQA vs CityView
- GovQA vs PublicInput
- GovQA vs Axon Records
- GovQA vs Mark43
- GovQA vs Vigilant Solutions
- GovQA vs Workday Government
- GovQA vs Zencity
- GovQA vs Polco
- GovQA vs RecDesk

