Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Rated
- -

Google Authenticator
Cybersecurity
Free TOTP two-factor authentication app that gained optional cloud sync in 2023
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Google Authenticator has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; Google Authenticator enabling cloud sync moves the security boundary for your 2FA codes to your Google account, so a compromised Google account can expose the same codes syncing was meant to protect.
- They diverge on capability: Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Google Authenticator covers TOTP code generation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and Google Authenticator actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | Google Authenticator |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | Free, no in-app purchases |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | iOS, Android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in Google Authenticator
- TOTP code generation
- QR code setup
- Optional Google account sync
- Offline generation
- Manual entry
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot Google Authenticator
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot Google Authenticator
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot Google Authenticator
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot Google Authenticator
Google Authenticator
- Someone setting up two-factor authentication on a website that asks for a TOTP appnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- A user who wants codes to survive a lost or replaced phone via account syncnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Someone who prefers a simple, free, single-purpose authenticator over a password manager's built-in onenot Entrust Identity as a Service
- A person migrating between phones who wants existing 2FA codes to transfer automaticallynot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Google Authenticator
- Enabling cloud sync moves the security boundary for your 2FA codes to your Google account, so a compromised Google account can expose the same codes syncing was meant to protect.
- It has no built-in backup export in a portable format, so moving away from Google Authenticator to another app usually means resetting 2FA on every individual service.
- It lacks organisational features such as folders, search or notes that some competing authenticator apps offer for people managing many accounts.
- There is no desktop app, so codes must be read off a phone screen when logging in from a computer.
- If sync is off and the phone is lost without a separate backup, all codes are unrecoverable and every linked account needs its 2FA reset through account recovery.
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Google Authenticator
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited accounts and codes
- Optional Google account cloud sync
- No ads
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Choose Google Authenticator if
- You need totp code generation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android.
- You also want qr code setup.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or Google Authenticator better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and Google Authenticator at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or Google Authenticator?
- Google Authenticator has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service and Free for Google Authenticator.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or Google Authenticator run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. Google Authenticator runs on iOS, Android.
- Can I use Google Authenticator for free?
- Yes. Google Authenticator has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what Google Authenticator is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that Google Authenticator cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login. Google Authenticator covers TOTP code generation, QR code setup, Optional Google account sync, Offline generation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
Google Authenticator: Does Google Authenticator cost anything?
No, it is free with no subscription or in-app purchases.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
Google Authenticator: Is cloud sync safe?
Google documents it as protected by your Google account security. Whether that is an acceptable trade-off versus device-only storage is debated; you can turn sync off if you prefer local-only codes.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
Google Authenticator: Can I export my codes to another app?
There is no official bulk export; moving to a different authenticator typically requires re-adding each account from its setup page.
Related pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
More on Google Authenticator
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Semgrep
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Arnica
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Endor Labs
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Sticky Password
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs 1Password
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs LastPass
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs HashiCorp Vault
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bitwarden
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Doppler
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Recorded Future
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs RoboForm
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Sardine
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Semperis
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs SentinelOne
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Google Authenticator vs Cisco Duo
- Google Authenticator vs JumpCloud
- Google Authenticator vs Ping Identity
- Google Authenticator vs Frontegg
- Google Authenticator vs Authelia
- Google Authenticator vs Beyond Identity
- Google Authenticator vs Transmit Security
- Google Authenticator vs Akeyless
- Google Authenticator vs authentik
- Google Authenticator vs Logto
- Google Authenticator vs Speakeasy
- Google Authenticator vs Authy
- Google Authenticator vs ExpressVPN
- Google Authenticator vs Falco
- Google Authenticator vs Fenergo
- Google Authenticator vs Grype
- Google Authenticator vs Hanwha Vision
- Google Authenticator vs Semgrep
- Google Authenticator vs Arnica
- Google Authenticator vs Endor Labs
- Google Authenticator vs Sticky Password
- Google Authenticator vs 1Password
- Google Authenticator vs LastPass
- Google Authenticator vs HashiCorp Vault
- Google Authenticator vs Bitwarden
- Google Authenticator vs Doppler
- Google Authenticator vs Recorded Future
- Google Authenticator vs RoboForm
- Google Authenticator vs Sardine
- Google Authenticator vs Semperis
- Google Authenticator vs SentinelOne
- Google Authenticator vs SentinelOne Singularity
