Government · head to head
DocuWare vs OWASP ZAP

DocuWare
Government
Document Management and Workflow Automation
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: DocuWare complex setup requiring significant IT effort before full functionality is achieved; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- They diverge on capability: DocuWare covers Document Storage, OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DocuWare and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DocuWare
- Document Storage
- Intelligent Indexing
- Workflow Automation
- Mobile Access
- Electronic Signatures
- Microsoft 365
- SAP
- QuickBooks
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DocuWare
- Citizen Servicesnot OWASP ZAP
- Records Managementnot OWASP ZAP
- Public Safetynot OWASP ZAP
- Civic Engagementnot OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot DocuWare
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot DocuWare
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot DocuWare
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot DocuWare
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DocuWare
- Complex setup requiring significant IT effort before full functionality is achieved
- Limited user interface customization restricting tailored workflows and branding
- Performance slowdowns when processing large document volumes or handling many simultaneous users
- Search requires exact matches and is case-sensitive, limiting usability
- Limited offline access with mobile app offering reduced functionality
- Integration challenges with major ERP platforms
- Steep initial investment, particularly for migrating older systems
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
DocuWare
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the DocuWare review.
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose DocuWare if
- You need document storage.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want intelligent indexing.
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is DocuWare or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. DocuWare starts at On request and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DocuWare or OWASP ZAP?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for DocuWare and Free for OWASP ZAP.
- Does DocuWare or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- DocuWare runs on Web, iOS, Android. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. DocuWare starts at On request.
- What is DocuWare best used for?
- DocuWare is most often used for citizen services, records management, public safety, civic engagement. Of those, citizen services and records management are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can DocuWare do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- DocuWare covers Document Storage, Intelligent Indexing, Workflow Automation, Mobile Access. OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DocuWare: Is DocuWare available as cloud or on-premises?
DocuWare is available as both a cloud-based SaaS solution and as an on-premises deployment option.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
DocuWare: What platforms does DocuWare support?
DocuWare is available as a web-based platform accessible via browser, with mobile apps available on iOS and Android.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
DocuWare: Does DocuWare offer offline access?
DocuWare has limited offline access capabilities. The mobile app offers fewer features compared to the desktop version.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
OWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DocuWare vs Laserfiche
- DocuWare vs OnBase
- DocuWare vs Legistar
- DocuWare vs Socrata
- DocuWare vs AWS GovCloud
- DocuWare vs CKAN
- DocuWare vs iCompass
- DocuWare vs Rock Solid
- DocuWare vs Azure Government
- DocuWare vs Bonfire
- DocuWare vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- DocuWare vs Citizen
- DocuWare vs Bang the Table
- DocuWare vs Tyler Brazos
- DocuWare vs CivicPlus
- DocuWare vs Tyler Technologies
- DocuWare vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- DocuWare vs Incode
- DocuWare vs 1Password
- DocuWare vs Bitdefender Total Security
- DocuWare vs Norton 360
- DocuWare vs LastPass
- DocuWare vs Bitwarden
- DocuWare vs Burp Suite
- DocuWare vs Metasploit
- DocuWare vs Wireshark
- DocuWare vs authentik
- DocuWare vs Authelia
- DocuWare vs Infisical
- DocuWare vs Trivy
- DocuWare vs Feedzai
- DocuWare vs Frontegg
- DocuWare vs HashiCorp Boundary
- DocuWare vs JumpCloud
- DocuWare vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs Laserfiche
- OWASP ZAP vs OnBase
- OWASP ZAP vs Legistar
- OWASP ZAP vs Socrata
- OWASP ZAP vs AWS GovCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs CKAN
- OWASP ZAP vs iCompass
- OWASP ZAP vs Rock Solid
- OWASP ZAP vs Azure Government
- OWASP ZAP vs Bonfire
- OWASP ZAP vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- OWASP ZAP vs Citizen
- OWASP ZAP vs Bang the Table
- OWASP ZAP vs Tyler Brazos
- OWASP ZAP vs CivicPlus
- OWASP ZAP vs Tyler Technologies
- OWASP ZAP vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- OWASP ZAP vs Incode
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
