Cybersecurity · head to head
McAfee Total Protection vs OWASP ZAP

McAfee Total Protection
Cybersecurity
Award-winning antivirus trusted by millions
- From
- $29.99/year
- Rated
- -

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: McAfee Total Protection significant renewal price increase after first year (from $29.99 to $84.99/year); OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- They diverge on capability: McAfee Total Protection covers Real-time antivirus, OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which McAfee Total Protection and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
| Attribute | McAfee Total Protection | OWASP ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29.99/year | Free |
| Pricing model | Unknown | free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Desktop, Cli, Api |
| Founded | 1987 | 2001 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in McAfee Total Protection
- Real-time antivirus
- Firewall
- Safe browsing
- Password manager
- Secure VPN
- Identity monitoring
- Protection Score
- Parental controls
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
McAfee Total Protection
- Antivirusnot OWASP ZAP
- Internet Securitynot OWASP ZAP
- Identity Protectionnot OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot McAfee Total Protection
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot McAfee Total Protection
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot McAfee Total Protection
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot McAfee Total Protection
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
McAfee Total Protection
- Significant renewal price increase after first year (from $29.99 to $84.99/year)
- Customer support responsiveness issues reported as reason for switching
- Renewal billing can be aggressive with auto-renewal defaults
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
McAfee Total Protection
$29.99/year- Basic$29.99/year
- Antivirus
- Firewall
- 1 device
- Plus$39.99/year
- Antivirus
- Firewall
- 5 devices
- Premium$49.99/year
- Antivirus
- Firewall
- VPN
- Advanced$74.99/year
- Antivirus
- Firewall
- VPN
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose McAfee Total Protection if
- You need real-time antivirus.
- You work on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want firewall.
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is McAfee Total Protection or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. McAfee Total Protection starts at $29.99/year and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, McAfee Total Protection or OWASP ZAP?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $29.99/year for McAfee Total Protection and Free for OWASP ZAP.
- Does McAfee Total Protection or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- McAfee Total Protection runs on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. McAfee Total Protection starts at $29.99/year.
- What is McAfee Total Protection best used for?
- McAfee Total Protection is most often used for antivirus, internet security, identity protection. Of those, antivirus and internet security are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can McAfee Total Protection do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- McAfee Total Protection covers Real-time antivirus, Firewall, Safe browsing, Password manager. OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
McAfee Total Protection: How much does McAfee Total Protection cost?
McAfee Total Protection introductory pricing ranges from $29.99/year (Basic) to $74.99/year (Advanced), but renewal costs jump to $84.99/year after the first year.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
McAfee Total Protection: What is the trial period for McAfee Total Protection?
McAfee offers a 60-day money-back guarantee, allowing you to try the service risk-free for two months.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
McAfee Total Protection: How many devices can I protect with one McAfee Total Protection subscription?
Device coverage varies by plan: Basic covers 1 device, while other plans protect 5 to unlimited devices depending on the tier selected.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
McAfee Total Protection: Does McAfee Total Protection include VPN?
VPN is included in higher-tier McAfee plans if you opt for auto-renewal.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
More on McAfee Total Protection
Other head to heads
- McAfee Total Protection vs Norton 360
- McAfee Total Protection vs Avast One
- McAfee Total Protection vs Bitdefender Total Security
- McAfee Total Protection vs Kaspersky Total Security
- McAfee Total Protection vs Surfshark
- McAfee Total Protection vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- McAfee Total Protection vs Private Internet Access
- McAfee Total Protection vs Windscribe
- McAfee Total Protection vs ProtonVPN
- McAfee Total Protection vs Mullvad VPN
- McAfee Total Protection vs CyberGhost VPN
- McAfee Total Protection vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- McAfee Total Protection vs Passbolt
- McAfee Total Protection vs Ping Identity
- McAfee Total Protection vs Proofpoint
- McAfee Total Protection vs Qualys VMDR
- McAfee Total Protection vs ExpressVPN
- McAfee Total Protection vs 1Password
- McAfee Total Protection vs LastPass
- McAfee Total Protection vs Bitwarden
- McAfee Total Protection vs Burp Suite
- McAfee Total Protection vs Metasploit
- McAfee Total Protection vs Wireshark
- McAfee Total Protection vs authentik
- McAfee Total Protection vs Authelia
- McAfee Total Protection vs Infisical
- McAfee Total Protection vs Trivy
- McAfee Total Protection vs Feedzai
- McAfee Total Protection vs Frontegg
- McAfee Total Protection vs HashiCorp Boundary
- McAfee Total Protection vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs Avast One
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Kaspersky Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Surfshark
- OWASP ZAP vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- OWASP ZAP vs Private Internet Access
- OWASP ZAP vs Windscribe
- OWASP ZAP vs ProtonVPN
- OWASP ZAP vs Mullvad VPN
- OWASP ZAP vs CyberGhost VPN
- OWASP ZAP vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- OWASP ZAP vs Passbolt
- OWASP ZAP vs Ping Identity
- OWASP ZAP vs Proofpoint
- OWASP ZAP vs Qualys VMDR
- OWASP ZAP vs ExpressVPN
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
