Government · head to head
iCompass vs OWASP ZAP

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: iCompass iCompass (a Diligent Corporation product for local government agenda management) publishes no pricing on its own site; every call to action is Contact Us or Request a Demo, with no figures anywhere on the page.; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- They diverge on capability: iCompass covers Agenda Creation, OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which iCompass and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), founded (2001).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in iCompass
- Agenda Creation
- Meeting Minutes
- Document Management
- Public Meeting Portal
- Voting Management
- Microsoft Office
- Video Streaming
- Document Storage
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
iCompass
- Citizen Servicesnot OWASP ZAP
- Records Managementnot OWASP ZAP
- Public Safetynot OWASP ZAP
- Civic Engagementnot OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot iCompass
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot iCompass
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot iCompass
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot iCompass
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
iCompass
- iCompass (a Diligent Corporation product for local government agenda management) publishes no pricing on its own site; every call to action is Contact Us or Request a Demo, with no figures anywhere on the page.
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
iCompass
$400/month- Government$400/month
- Agenda Management
- Meeting Minutes
- Public Portal
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose iCompass if
- You need agenda creation.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want meeting minutes.
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is iCompass or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. iCompass starts at $400/month and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, iCompass or OWASP ZAP?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $400/month for iCompass and Free for OWASP ZAP.
- Does iCompass or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- iCompass runs on Web, Ios, Android. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. iCompass starts at $400/month.
- What is iCompass best used for?
- iCompass is most often used for citizen services, records management, public safety, civic engagement. Of those, citizen services and records management are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can iCompass do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- iCompass covers Agenda Creation, Meeting Minutes, Document Management, Public Meeting Portal. OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
OWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
OWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
OWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- iCompass vs DocuWare
- iCompass vs Accela
- iCompass vs CivicPlus
- iCompass vs Granicus
- iCompass vs OpenGov
- iCompass vs Socrata
- iCompass vs ClearGov
- iCompass vs NextRequest
- iCompass vs MuckRock
- iCompass vs ShotSpotter
- iCompass vs Springbrook Software
- iCompass vs Vigilant Solutions
- iCompass vs Workday Government
- iCompass vs Zencity
- iCompass vs Legistar
- iCompass vs Tyler Technologies
- iCompass vs Incode
- iCompass vs Tyler Brazos
- iCompass vs 1Password
- iCompass vs Bitdefender Total Security
- iCompass vs Norton 360
- iCompass vs LastPass
- iCompass vs Bitwarden
- iCompass vs Burp Suite
- iCompass vs Metasploit
- iCompass vs Wireshark
- iCompass vs authentik
- iCompass vs Authelia
- iCompass vs Infisical
- iCompass vs Trivy
- iCompass vs Feedzai
- iCompass vs Frontegg
- iCompass vs HashiCorp Boundary
- iCompass vs JumpCloud
- iCompass vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs DocuWare
- OWASP ZAP vs Accela
- OWASP ZAP vs CivicPlus
- OWASP ZAP vs Granicus
- OWASP ZAP vs OpenGov
- OWASP ZAP vs Socrata
- OWASP ZAP vs ClearGov
- OWASP ZAP vs NextRequest
- OWASP ZAP vs MuckRock
- OWASP ZAP vs ShotSpotter
- OWASP ZAP vs Springbrook Software
- OWASP ZAP vs Vigilant Solutions
- OWASP ZAP vs Workday Government
- OWASP ZAP vs Zencity
- OWASP ZAP vs Legistar
- OWASP ZAP vs Tyler Technologies
- OWASP ZAP vs Incode
- OWASP ZAP vs Tyler Brazos
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection

