Cybersecurity · head to head
Burp Suite vs OWASP ZAP

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Burp Suite the automated vulnerability scanner is Professional only, at $499; the free Community edition is manual tools; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- They diverge on capability: Burp Suite covers Web vulnerability scanner, OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Burp Suite and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
| Attribute | Burp Suite | OWASP ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | free |
| Platforms | Desktop, Api | Desktop, Cli, Api |
| Founded | 2004 | 2001 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Burp Suite
- Web vulnerability scanner
- Proxy interceptor
- Intruder
- Repeater
- Sequencer
- Decoder
- Comparer
- Logger
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Burp Suite
- Manual web application penetration testing through an intercepting proxynot OWASP ZAP
- Automated scanning for web vulnerabilities on the Professional editionnot OWASP ZAP
- Extending testing with community-built BApp extensionsnot OWASP ZAP
- Enterprise-wide dynamic scanning through Burp DASTnot OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot Burp Suite
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot Burp Suite
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot Burp Suite
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot Burp Suite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Burp Suite
- The automated vulnerability scanner is Professional only, at $499; the free Community edition is manual tools
- BApp Store extensions require the Professional edition
- DAST and the agentic testing product are separate enterprise offerings with no published price
- Professional is licensed per user per year rather than perpetually
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Burp Suite
Free- Community EditionFree
- Essential manual tools
- Proxy
- Repeater
- Professional$449/year
- All Community features
- Burp Scanner
- Advanced manual tools
- Enterprise$6995/year
- CI/CD integration
- Scheduled scans
- Role-based access
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose Burp Suite if
- You need web vulnerability scanner.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Api.
- You also want proxy interceptor.
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Burp Suite starts at Free and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP?
- Burp Suite starts at Free and OWASP ZAP at Free.
- Does Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- Burp Suite runs on Desktop, Api. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use Burp Suite for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Burp Suite best used for?
- Burp Suite is most often used for manual web application penetration testing through an intercepting proxy, automated scanning for web vulnerabilities on the professional edition, extending testing with community-built bapp extensions, enterprise-wide dynamic scanning through burp dast. Of those, manual web application penetration testing through an intercepting proxy and automated scanning for web vulnerabilities on the professional edition are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can Burp Suite do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- Burp Suite covers Web vulnerability scanner, Proxy interceptor, Intruder, Repeater. OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Burp Suite: Does Burp Suite offer a free version?
Yes, Burp Suite Community Edition is available free and supports manual testing. The page does not provide specific details on additional paid editions or their pricing.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
Burp Suite: What features are available in the free edition?
Burp Suite Community Edition supports manual security testing, though specific feature limitations compared to paid editions are not detailed on this page. Visit individual product pages for detailed tier comparisons.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
Burp Suite: Are paid versions of Burp Suite available?
Yes, PortSwigger offers Burp Suite Professional and Burp Suite DAST as paid products, though specific pricing and feature details are not available on the main product page.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
OWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Burp Suite vs 1Password
- Burp Suite vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Burp Suite vs Norton 360
- Burp Suite vs LastPass
- Burp Suite vs Metasploit
- Burp Suite vs Acunetix
- Burp Suite vs Nessus
- Burp Suite vs BigID
- Burp Suite vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Burp Suite vs LogicManager
- Burp Suite vs Mullvad VPN
- Burp Suite vs Private Internet Access
- Burp Suite vs Quantexa
- Burp Suite vs Termly
- Burp Suite vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Burp Suite vs Tenable Nessus
- Burp Suite vs Bitwarden
- Burp Suite vs Wireshark
- Burp Suite vs authentik
- Burp Suite vs Authelia
- Burp Suite vs Infisical
- Burp Suite vs Trivy
- Burp Suite vs Feedzai
- Burp Suite vs Frontegg
- Burp Suite vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Burp Suite vs JumpCloud
- Burp Suite vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Acunetix
- OWASP ZAP vs Nessus
- OWASP ZAP vs BigID
- OWASP ZAP vs Kaspersky Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs LogicManager
- OWASP ZAP vs Mullvad VPN
- OWASP ZAP vs Private Internet Access
- OWASP ZAP vs Quantexa
- OWASP ZAP vs Termly
- OWASP ZAP vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- OWASP ZAP vs Tenable Nessus
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection

