OWASP ZAPvs
1Password
1Password: The world's most-loved password manager
OWASP ZAP
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
As of 30 August 2026, OWASP ZAP is free to use. The only full-featured dynamic application security scanner that is free and scriptable, which is why it ends up in pipelines where a per-application commercial licence would never be approved. Softwr lists it under Cybersecurity. OWASP ZAP is made by OWASP Foundation, launched in 2001, available on Windows, macOS, API.
Overview
What OWASP ZAP does
ZAP, the Zed Attack Proxy, is an open-source dynamic application security testing tool released under the Apache 2.0 licence. It works as an intercepting HTTP and HTTPS proxy with a passive scanner that inspects traffic as it passes, an active scanner that sends attack payloads, a traditional spider and an AJAX spider driven by a headless browser, a fuzzer, and an add-on marketplace. It runs as a desktop application, as a headless daemon driven by a documented REST API, and as official Docker images intended for continuous integration. It is written in Java and runs on Windows, macOS and Linux. Started in 2010 by Simon Bennetts as an OWASP flagship project, ZAP moved in August 2024 to the Software Security Project, a separate organisation, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. Much older documentation and many search results still call it OWASP ZAP. What makes it distinctive is not a detection capability that commercial scanners lack. It is the licensing. Commercial DAST is sold per application or per scan target, which means an organisation with two hundred internal applications tests the twelve it can afford to license, and the rest are never scanned at all. ZAP has no per-target cost, so the constraint moves from procurement to staffing, and the baseline scan can run against everything. For most organisations that shift is worth more than any difference in detection quality, because the applications that get breached are usually the ones nobody was scanning. It is used by application security teams, penetration testers who want an intercepting proxy they can script, and development teams adding a baseline scan to a pipeline. The trade-off is that there is no vendor. Nobody is contractually obliged to fix your broken authentication script before the release, nobody signs off the report for your auditor, and the tuning work that makes the output credible is yours. Teams that adopt ZAP successfully treat it as a tool that needs an owner; teams that treat it as a free replacement for a commercial product usually end up with a pipeline step that always passes and nobody who can say why.
What people use it for
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselves
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscription
Related searches
The honest half
Where it falls short
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about OWASP ZAP.
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Cross-shopped
What people choose instead of OWASP ZAP
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.
- OWASP ZAPvsBitdefender Total Security
Bitdefender Total Security: The world's #1 rated antivirus
- OWASP ZAPvsLastPass
LastPass: Simplify online life with LastPass password manager
- OWASP ZAPvsNorton 360
Norton 360: Powerful protection against evolving threats
Pricing
What OWASP ZAP costs
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Free & Open Source
Free
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
- Fuzzer
- API support
- Extensions marketplace
Capabilities
Features
Intercepting proxy
Sits between browser and application so requests and responses can be inspected, modified and replayed by hand
Passive scanner
Analyses traffic that already passed through the proxy without sending any additional requests to the target
Active scanner
Sends crafted attack payloads against discovered endpoints and parameters to confirm exploitable behaviour
AJAX spider
Drives a headless browser to discover routes in single-page applications that a traditional crawler cannot see
Automation Framework
Declarative YAML job definitions so a scan is version-controlled configuration rather than console clicks
Headless daemon and REST API
Full control of scanning from scripts and pipelines without the desktop interface
Docker images
Official images including baseline and full-scan entry points designed for continuous integration
Add-on marketplace
Community and core extensions for additional rules, reporting formats, protocols and integrations
Scripting engine
Custom authentication, payload and rule scripts in JavaScript and other JSR-223 languages
Apache 2.0 licence
Free for commercial use, modification and redistribution with no per-application or per-scan cost
Answered, with sources
Questions people ask
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Behind it
Who makes OWASP ZAP
- Company
- OWASP Foundation
- Based in
- Global (Non-profit)
Keep looking
Where to go from OWASP ZAP
- OWASP ZAP alternativesEvery product people weigh against it
- OWASP ZAP pricingPlans, floors and what the tiers exclude
- OWASP ZAP badgesWhich rules it meets, and the figure behind each
- All Cybersecurity softwareThe full category
- Best Cybersecurity softwareThe shortlist, and how it was cut
Best Cybersecurity software for
Compare OWASP ZAP with
- 1Password
- Bitdefender Total Security
- Norton 360
- LastPass
- Bitwarden
- Burp Suite
- Metasploit
- Wireshark
- authentik
- Authelia
- Infisical
- Trivy
- Feedzai
- Frontegg
- HashiCorp Boundary
- JumpCloud
- McAfee Total Protection
- Infisical
Other Cybersecurity software
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
Free plan9 researched notesOpen-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
Open source9 researched notesReal-time transaction fraud and financial crime detection for banks and payment processors
Pricing on request10 researched notesCustomer identity and access management platform for SaaS applications
Free plan9 researched notesIdentity-aware session broker for infrastructure access without distributing credentials
Open source12 researched notesUnified identity and device management for hybrid workforce.
From $9/user/month12 researched notes
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for OWASP ZAP, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
More on OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP alternatives
What people switch to, and what they give up
OWASP ZAP pricing
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Compare OWASP ZAP
Put it head to head with anything we hold
OWASP ZAP badge
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Best Cybersecurity software alternatives
Large Chinese video platform that US federal buyers and federal contractors cannot lawfully use
quote
Managed video loss prevention with human auditors for restaurants, convenience stores and retail
quote
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
Per user per month
Privileged access management, endpoint privilege management and secure remote access
quote
Cloud video surveillance billed per camera per month, where retention length drives the bill more than anything else
Per camera per month
AI video search that runs on cameras you already own, starting near five dollars per camera per month
Per camera per month
Phishing-resistant passwordless authentication with device trust enforced at every login
quote