Government · head to head
CentralSquare Asset Management vs OWASP ZAP

CentralSquare Asset Management
Government
Public sector enterprise asset management, sold for years as Lucity
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CentralSquare Asset Management the Lucity name is now only a suffix on a CentralSquare product, so long-standing customers should confirm which capabilities carry forward under the current release rather than assuming continuity from the Lucity they know.; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- They diverge on capability: CentralSquare Asset Management covers Esri ArcGIS integration, OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CentralSquare Asset Management and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
| Attribute | CentralSquare Asset Management | OWASP ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, On-premise | Desktop, Cli, Api |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 2001 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CentralSquare Asset Management
- Esri ArcGIS integration
- Public works asset breadth
- Citizen request intake
- Condition assessment
- Inspections
- Suite integration
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CentralSquare Asset Management
- A city consolidating streets, water, parks and facilities maintenance into one asset register instead of four departmental spreadsheetsnot OWASP ZAP
- A county needing auditable stormwater and backflow inspection records for a regulatory programmenot OWASP ZAP
- A public works department wanting citizen-reported potholes and blocked drains to become work orders without manual re-keyingnot OWASP ZAP
- A municipality already running CentralSquare finance that wants asset and work costs to land in the general ledger without an integration projectnot OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot CentralSquare Asset Management
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot CentralSquare Asset Management
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot CentralSquare Asset Management
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot CentralSquare Asset Management
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CentralSquare Asset Management
- The Lucity name is now only a suffix on a CentralSquare product, so long-standing customers should confirm which capabilities carry forward under the current release rather than assuming continuity from the Lucity they know.
- CentralSquare is private-equity owned and grew by acquisition, so asset management competes for development attention against public safety and finance products with larger revenue, and its roadmap is not independently controlled.
- Pricing is unpublished and quoted per municipality, and asset management is often presented alongside other suite modules, so a department must work to get a clean, unbundled number it can defend at council.
- Esri ArcGIS is effectively a prerequisite for the spatial capability that makes the product worth buying, and that licence is a separate cost the software quote will not include.
- It is North America focused, aligned to United States municipal practice, funding structures and regulatory programmes, which limits its fit for local authorities elsewhere.
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
CentralSquare Asset Management
On request- CentralSquare Asset Management$undefined/year
- Subscription or on-premise licensing, quoted per municipality
- Priced on population, module selection and user counts
- Esri ArcGIS licensing purchased separately
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose CentralSquare Asset Management if
- You need esri arcgis integration.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want public works asset breadth.
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is CentralSquare Asset Management or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. CentralSquare Asset Management starts at On request and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CentralSquare Asset Management or OWASP ZAP?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for CentralSquare Asset Management and Free for OWASP ZAP.
- Does CentralSquare Asset Management or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- CentralSquare Asset Management runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, On-premise. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CentralSquare Asset Management starts at On request.
- What is CentralSquare Asset Management best used for?
- CentralSquare Asset Management is most often used for a city consolidating streets, water, parks and facilities maintenance into one asset register instead of four departmental spreadsheets, a county needing auditable stormwater and backflow inspection records for a regulatory programme, a public works department wanting citizen-reported potholes and blocked drains to become work orders without manual re-keying, a municipality already running centralsquare finance that wants asset and work costs to land in the general ledger without an integration project. Of those, a city consolidating streets, water, parks and facilities maintenance into one asset register instead of four departmental spreadsheets and a county needing auditable stormwater and backflow inspection records for a regulatory programme are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can CentralSquare Asset Management do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- CentralSquare Asset Management covers Esri ArcGIS integration, Public works asset breadth, Citizen request intake, Condition assessment. OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CentralSquare Asset Management: Can I still buy Lucity?
Not under that name alone. It is sold as CentralSquare Asset Management powered by Lucity, and quotes and contracts will use the CentralSquare name.
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
CentralSquare Asset Management: Do I need Esri?
In practice yes. The spatial asset handling that distinguishes the product depends on ArcGIS, licensed separately from Esri.
OWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
CentralSquare Asset Management: Is it cloud only?
No. Both hosted subscription and on-premise deployment are available, which matters for municipalities with data residency or network policy constraints.
OWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
CentralSquare Asset Management: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted per municipality based on population, modules and users, usually through a public procurement process.
OWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
More on CentralSquare Asset Management
Other head to heads
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs VUEWorks
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Euna Solutions
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs MyRec.com
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs NEOGOV
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs SAP for Government
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs OpenGov
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Tyler Technologies
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Laserfiche
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs OnBase
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs SeeClickFix
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs ShotSpotter
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Springbrook Software
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Vigilant Solutions
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Tyler Brazos
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs 1Password
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Bitdefender Total Security
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Norton 360
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs LastPass
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Bitwarden
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Burp Suite
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Metasploit
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Wireshark
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs authentik
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Authelia
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Infisical
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Trivy
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Feedzai
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Frontegg
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs HashiCorp Boundary
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs JumpCloud
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- OWASP ZAP vs VUEWorks
- OWASP ZAP vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- OWASP ZAP vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- OWASP ZAP vs Euna Solutions
- OWASP ZAP vs MyRec.com
- OWASP ZAP vs NEOGOV
- OWASP ZAP vs SAP for Government
- OWASP ZAP vs OpenGov
- OWASP ZAP vs Tyler Technologies
- OWASP ZAP vs Laserfiche
- OWASP ZAP vs OnBase
- OWASP ZAP vs SeeClickFix
- OWASP ZAP vs ShotSpotter
- OWASP ZAP vs Springbrook Software
- OWASP ZAP vs Vigilant Solutions
- OWASP ZAP vs Tyler Brazos
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
