Cybersecurity · head to head
JumpCloud vs OWASP ZAP

JumpCloud
Cybersecurity
Unified identity and device management for hybrid workforce.
- From
- $9/user/month
- Rated
- -

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: JumpCloud platform Essentials tier capped at 300 users; larger organisations must purchase unbundled tiers or negotiate custom pricing; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which JumpCloud and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in JumpCloud
Nothing recorded that OWASP ZAP does not also cover.
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
JumpCloud
- Organisations modernising from Active Directory to cloud identity infrastructurenot OWASP ZAP
- Companies requiring unified user and device management in hybrid work environmentsnot OWASP ZAP
- IT teams implementing zero-trust security modelsnot OWASP ZAP
- Managed service providers requiring multi-tenant identity and device managementnot OWASP ZAP
- Educational institutions and nonprofits (eligible for special pricing)not OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot JumpCloud
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot JumpCloud
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot JumpCloud
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot JumpCloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
JumpCloud
- Platform Essentials tier capped at 300 users; larger organisations must purchase unbundled tiers or negotiate custom pricing
- À la carte pricing can become expensive when purchasing multiple features; device management at $9/user, SSO at $11/user totals $20/user for basic functionality
- Bundled Platform and Platform Prime packages require contacting sales; no published pricing limits transparency
- Zero-trust and AI & SaaS management capabilities only available in Platform Prime tier with custom pricing
- No on-premises or self-hosted option; cloud-only deployment
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
JumpCloud
$9/user/month- À La Carte - Device Management$9/user/month (annual) or $11 (monthly)
- Device management across Windows, Mac, Linux
- Remote assistance
- Patch management
- À La Carte - SSO$11/user/month (annual) or $13 (monthly)
- Single sign-on
- Multi-factor authentication
- Password management
- Platform Essentials$undefined/variable
- Identity and device management with SSO and passwordless auth
- Maximum 300 users
- Contact sales for pricing
- Platform$undefined/variable
- Unified identity, device and access management
- Contact sales for pricing
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is JumpCloud or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. JumpCloud starts at $9/user/month and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, JumpCloud or OWASP ZAP?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $9/user/month for JumpCloud and Free for OWASP ZAP.
- Does JumpCloud or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- JumpCloud runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, API. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. JumpCloud starts at $9/user/month.
- What is JumpCloud best used for?
- JumpCloud is most often used for organisations modernising from active directory to cloud identity infrastructure, companies requiring unified user and device management in hybrid work environments, it teams implementing zero-trust security models, managed service providers requiring multi-tenant identity and device management. Of those, organisations modernising from active directory to cloud identity infrastructure and companies requiring unified user and device management in hybrid work environments are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can JumpCloud do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
JumpCloud: What devices does JumpCloud support?
JumpCloud supports unified endpoint management for Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS and Android devices.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
JumpCloud: Can I use JumpCloud to replace Active Directory?
Yes. JumpCloud is designed for organisations modernising from on-premises Active Directory to cloud-based directory and identity management.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
JumpCloud: Is there a free trial?
Yes. All users can access a 30-day free trial before purchasing.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
OWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- JumpCloud vs Bitdefender Total Security
- JumpCloud vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- JumpCloud vs Teleport
- JumpCloud vs 1Password
- JumpCloud vs Norton 360
- JumpCloud vs LastPass
- JumpCloud vs Akeyless
- JumpCloud vs One Identity
- JumpCloud vs WorkOS
- JumpCloud vs Infisical
- JumpCloud vs Netwrix
- JumpCloud vs Securiti
- JumpCloud vs Mimecast
- JumpCloud vs Motorola Vigilant
- JumpCloud vs Nessus
- JumpCloud vs NordPass
- JumpCloud vs Ory Kratos
- JumpCloud vs Bitwarden
- JumpCloud vs Burp Suite
- JumpCloud vs Metasploit
- JumpCloud vs Wireshark
- JumpCloud vs authentik
- JumpCloud vs Authelia
- JumpCloud vs Trivy
- JumpCloud vs Feedzai
- JumpCloud vs Frontegg
- JumpCloud vs HashiCorp Boundary
- JumpCloud vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- OWASP ZAP vs Teleport
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Akeyless
- OWASP ZAP vs One Identity
- OWASP ZAP vs WorkOS
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Netwrix
- OWASP ZAP vs Securiti
- OWASP ZAP vs Mimecast
- OWASP ZAP vs Motorola Vigilant
- OWASP ZAP vs Nessus
- OWASP ZAP vs NordPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Ory Kratos
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
