Developer Tools · head to head
Dagger vs Luzmo

Dagger
Developer Tools
Programmable CI/CD engine that runs your pipeline as containers on any runner
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Luzmo
Business Intelligence
Embedded analytics for SaaS products, billed by monthly active dashboard users
- From
- €995/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Dagger has a free plan, then $50/mo; Luzmo starts at €995/mo.
- Only Dagger lists pipelines as code; only Luzmo lists multi-tenant row-level security.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dagger and Luzmo actually diverge.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dagger
- Pipelines as code
- Local and CI parity
- Content-addressed caching
- Dagger Functions and modules
- CI-provider agnostic
- Dagger Cloud traces
- GitHub Checks integration
- Container-native execution
Only in Luzmo
- Multi-tenant row-level security
- Embeddable editor
- Theming and white labelling
- SDKs and APIs
- Luzmo IQ
- Scheduled exports
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dagger
- A platform team maintaining near-identical build YAML across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls insteadnot Luzmo
- An engineering organisation migrating off a CI provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migrationnot Luzmo
- A team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug CI-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locallynot Luzmo
- A monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materiallynot Luzmo
Luzmo
- A B2B SaaS product that needs customer-facing dashboards without hiring a front-end data visualisation teamnot Dagger
- A vertical software vendor that wants to sell an analytics module as a paid add-onnot Dagger
- A product where each customer must only see their own rows and the security boundary has to be provable to an auditornot Dagger
- A team that wants end customers to build their own charts rather than filing feature requests for every new reportnot Dagger
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dagger
- Dagger is not a CI provider, so you keep paying for GitHub Actions or GitLab runners underneath it; the Dagger Cloud subscription is an addition to your CI bill, not a replacement for it
- Writing pipelines in Go or TypeScript raises the barrier to entry: a release engineer who could edit a YAML step now needs to read code, and the people who can fix a broken build shrink to those comfortable with the SDK
- The engine runs as a container on the runner and needs a persistent cache volume to deliver its main benefit, so ephemeral CI runners give you correctness without the speed, and provisioning durable cache storage is extra platform work
- The Team plan caps at ten users and ten million events per month; an organisation of any size crosses that quickly and moves to Enterprise pricing that is not published, so cost at scale is unknowable up front
- The module ecosystem is young and thinly maintained relative to the marketplace of a mature CI provider, so integrations that exist as a one-line Action often have to be written yourself as a Dagger function
Luzmo
- Billing by monthly active users means commercial success is punished: getting every one of your customers into the dashboard weekly is exactly the outcome that pushes you into the next tier
- The entry price of EUR 995 per month billed annually rules it out for early-stage products, so the realistic buyer already has meaningful revenue
- It is built for embedding rather than internal analysis, so most customers still pay for a second BI tool for their own staff, doubling the analytics line item
- The semantic modelling layer is lighter than a dedicated one such as dbt or Cube, so complex metric definitions often have to be pre-computed in the warehouse before Luzmo sees them
- As a smaller European vendor it has less connector breadth and a smaller partner ecosystem than the US incumbents, and unusual data sources frequently need an intermediate warehouse hop
Pricing, plan by plan
Dagger
Free- IndividualFree
- One user
- One million events per month
- Workflow logs and function call traces
- Team$50/mo
- Up to ten users
- Ten million events per month
- Module insights and module catalogue
- EnterpriseOn request
- Custom user and event limits
- SSO
- Managed single-tenant deployment
Luzmo
€995/month- Starter€995/mo
- Embedded dashboards with white labelling
- Custom charts
- APIs and SDKs
- Premium€2,495/mo
- Everything in Starter
- End-customer self-service dashboard building
- Luzmo IQ conversational insights
- EnterpriseOn request
- Dedicated VPC option
- Flexible hosting region
- OIDC single sign-on
Which should you pick?
Choose Dagger if
- You need pipelines as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want local and ci parity.
Choose Luzmo if
- You need multi-tenant row-level security.
- You also want embeddable editor.
Questions people ask
- Is Dagger or Luzmo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dagger starts at Free and Luzmo at €995/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dagger or Luzmo?
- Dagger has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Dagger and €995/month for Luzmo.
- Does Dagger or Luzmo run on more platforms?
- Dagger runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted. Luzmo runs on Web.
- Can I use Dagger for free?
- Yes. Dagger has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Luzmo starts at €995/month.
- What is Dagger best used for?
- Dagger is most often used for a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead, an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration, a team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug ci-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locally, a monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materially. Of those, a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead and an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration are not what Luzmo is typically brought in for.
- What can Dagger do that Luzmo cannot?
- Dagger covers Pipelines as code, Local and CI parity, Content-addressed caching, Dagger Functions and modules. Luzmo covers Multi-tenant row-level security, Embeddable editor, Theming and white labelling, SDKs and APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dagger: Does Dagger replace GitHub Actions?
No. Dagger runs inside GitHub Actions or any other CI. It replaces the YAML that describes your pipeline steps, not the trigger and runner layer.
Luzmo: Is Luzmo the same as Cumul.io?
Yes. Cumul.io rebranded to Luzmo; it is the same company and product line.
Dagger: Is the engine open source?
Yes, the Dagger engine and SDKs are open source and free. Dagger Cloud, the observability product, is what costs money.
Luzmo: How is it priced?
By monthly active users of your embedded dashboards, from EUR 995 per month on Starter billed annually.
Dagger: What is an event in the pricing?
Dagger Cloud meters pipeline telemetry events. One million per month is free; the Team plan at 50 USD per month allows ten million.
Luzmo: Is there a free tier?
No, only a trial. There is no perpetual free plan.
Dagger: Can I run the same pipeline on my laptop?
Yes, that is the main reason teams adopt it. The dagger CLI executes the identical graph locally, so CI-only failures become reproducible.
Luzmo: Can our customers build their own dashboards?
Yes, but the embeddable editor for end-customer self-service sits on the Premium tier.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dagger vs Earthly
- Dagger vs Buildkite
- Dagger vs Tilt
- Dagger vs Nixpacks
- Dagger vs Depot
- Dagger vs Blacksmith
- Dagger vs Jenkins
- Dagger vs WarpBuild
- Dagger vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Dagger vs GitLab
- Dagger vs ConfigCat
- Dagger vs Cortex
- Dagger vs Deep Code
- Dagger vs Deno
- Dagger vs Envoy
- Dagger vs Fig
- Dagger vs Docker
- Dagger vs Kubernetes
- Dagger vs GoodData
- Dagger vs Sisense
- Dagger vs DashThis
- Dagger vs Databox
- Dagger vs Reportz
- Dagger vs Mixpanel
- Dagger vs Klipfolio
- Dagger vs Hex
- Dagger vs Cyfe
- Dagger vs Deepnote
- Dagger vs Grow
- Dagger vs Baremetrics
- Dagger vs Hebbia
- Dagger vs Holistics
- Dagger vs Jedox
- Dagger vs Logi Analytics
- Dagger vs NetBase Quid
- Dagger vs Phocas
- Luzmo vs Earthly
- Luzmo vs Buildkite
- Luzmo vs Tilt
- Luzmo vs Nixpacks
- Luzmo vs Depot
- Luzmo vs Blacksmith
- Luzmo vs Jenkins
- Luzmo vs WarpBuild
- Luzmo vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Luzmo vs GitLab
- Luzmo vs ConfigCat
- Luzmo vs Cortex
- Luzmo vs Deep Code
- Luzmo vs Deno
- Luzmo vs Envoy
- Luzmo vs Fig
- Luzmo vs Docker
- Luzmo vs Kubernetes
- Luzmo vs GoodData
- Luzmo vs Sisense
- Luzmo vs DashThis
- Luzmo vs Databox
- Luzmo vs Reportz
- Luzmo vs Mixpanel
- Luzmo vs Klipfolio
- Luzmo vs Hex
- Luzmo vs Cyfe
- Luzmo vs Deepnote
- Luzmo vs Grow
- Luzmo vs Baremetrics
- Luzmo vs Hebbia
- Luzmo vs Holistics
- Luzmo vs Jedox
- Luzmo vs Logi Analytics
- Luzmo vs NetBase Quid
- Luzmo vs Phocas
