Developer Tools · head to head
Dagger vs Reportz

Dagger
Developer Tools
Programmable CI/CD engine that runs your pipeline as containers on any runner
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Reportz
Business Intelligence
Per-dashboard marketing reporting at under ten dollars a client
- From
- $9.9/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Dagger has a free plan, then $50/mo; Reportz starts at $9.9/mo.
- Only Dagger lists pipelines as code; only Reportz lists per-dashboard pricing.
- Where Reportz falls short: there is no data modelling, SQL or warehouse layer, so cross-source analysis is limited to what the widget set already supports.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dagger and Reportz actually diverge.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dagger
- Pipelines as code
- Local and CI parity
- Content-addressed caching
- Dagger Functions and modules
- CI-provider agnostic
- Dagger Cloud traces
- GitHub Checks integration
- Container-native execution
Only in Reportz
- Per-dashboard pricing
- Unlimited users
- Public share links
- White labelling
- Template library
- Scheduled reports
- Custom KPI widgets
- Client management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dagger
- A platform team maintaining near-identical build YAML across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls insteadnot Reportz
- An engineering organisation migrating off a CI provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migrationnot Reportz
- A team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug CI-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locallynot Reportz
- A monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materiallynot Reportz
Reportz
- A five-person SEO agency reporting to twenty five clients that cannot justify several hundred dollars a month for reporting softwarenot Dagger
- A freelancer who needs one white-labelled dashboard per client and nothing elsenot Dagger
- An agency giving clients a live link instead of a monthly PDF, without buying client seatsnot Dagger
- A marketing team wanting a cheap always-on KPI screen fed from ad and analytics platformsnot Dagger
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dagger
- Dagger is not a CI provider, so you keep paying for GitHub Actions or GitLab runners underneath it; the Dagger Cloud subscription is an addition to your CI bill, not a replacement for it
- Writing pipelines in Go or TypeScript raises the barrier to entry: a release engineer who could edit a YAML step now needs to read code, and the people who can fix a broken build shrink to those comfortable with the SDK
- The engine runs as a container on the runner and needs a persistent cache volume to deliver its main benefit, so ephemeral CI runners give you correctness without the speed, and provisioning durable cache storage is extra platform work
- The Team plan caps at ten users and ten million events per month; an organisation of any size crosses that quickly and moves to Enterprise pricing that is not published, so cost at scale is unknowable up front
- The module ecosystem is young and thinly maintained relative to the marketplace of a mature CI provider, so integrations that exist as a one-line Action often have to be written yourself as a Dagger function
Reportz
- The connector library is smaller than the established agency reporting tools, and if a platform you report on is missing there is no practical route to getting it added
- Four Dots is a small agency-owned business rather than a funded software company, so API breakages and platform changes can take longer to fix than at larger vendors
- There is no data modelling, SQL or warehouse layer, so cross-source analysis is limited to what the widget set already supports
- Per-dashboard billing means an agency that builds several views per client loses the headline price advantage quickly
- Documentation and support are thin compared with larger competitors, and complex setups often need direct email support rather than self-service answers
Pricing, plan by plan
Dagger
Free- IndividualFree
- One user
- One million events per month
- Workflow logs and function call traces
- Team$50/mo
- Up to ten users
- Ten million events per month
- Module insights and module catalogue
- EnterpriseOn request
- Custom user and event limits
- SSO
- Managed single-tenant deployment
Reportz
$9.9/month- Consultant$9.9/mo
- Priced per dashboard
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited data sources
- Agency$99/mo
- Around ten dashboards at the same per-dashboard rate
- Unlimited users
- Custom domain
- Enterprise$742.5/mo
- 75 dashboards
- Volume rate
- Unlimited users
Which should you pick?
Choose Dagger if
- You need pipelines as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want local and ci parity.
Questions people ask
- Is Dagger or Reportz better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dagger starts at Free and Reportz at $9.9/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dagger or Reportz?
- Dagger has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Dagger and $9.9/month for Reportz.
- Does Dagger or Reportz run on more platforms?
- Dagger runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted. Reportz runs on Web.
- Can I use Dagger for free?
- Yes. Dagger has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Reportz starts at $9.9/month.
- What is Dagger best used for?
- Dagger is most often used for a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead, an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration, a team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug ci-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locally, a monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materially. Of those, a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead and an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration are not what Reportz is typically brought in for.
- What can Dagger do that Reportz cannot?
- Dagger covers Pipelines as code, Local and CI parity, Content-addressed caching, Dagger Functions and modules. Reportz covers Per-dashboard pricing, Unlimited users, Public share links, White labelling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dagger: Does Dagger replace GitHub Actions?
No. Dagger runs inside GitHub Actions or any other CI. It replaces the YAML that describes your pipeline steps, not the trigger and runner layer.
Reportz: What does Reportz cost?
9.90 US dollars per dashboard per month, with unlimited users and data sources on every tier.
Dagger: Is the engine open source?
Yes, the Dagger engine and SDKs are open source and free. Dagger Cloud, the observability product, is what costs money.
Reportz: Is there a free plan?
No, but there is a fifteen day trial with no card required.
Dagger: What is an event in the pricing?
Dagger Cloud meters pipeline telemetry events. One million per month is free; the Team plan at 50 USD per month allows ten million.
Reportz: Who is behind it?
Four Dots, a digital marketing agency in Belgrade that built the tool for its own client reporting.
Dagger: Can I run the same pipeline on my laptop?
Yes, that is the main reason teams adopt it. The dagger CLI executes the identical graph locally, so CI-only failures become reproducible.
Reportz: Can clients view without a login?
Yes, dashboards can be shared as a public link under your own domain.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dagger vs Earthly
- Dagger vs Buildkite
- Dagger vs Tilt
- Dagger vs Nixpacks
- Dagger vs Depot
- Dagger vs Blacksmith
- Dagger vs Jenkins
- Dagger vs WarpBuild
- Dagger vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Dagger vs GitLab
- Dagger vs ConfigCat
- Dagger vs Cortex
- Dagger vs Deep Code
- Dagger vs Deno
- Dagger vs Envoy
- Dagger vs Fig
- Dagger vs Docker
- Dagger vs Kubernetes
- Dagger vs Databox
- Dagger vs Klipfolio
- Dagger vs DashThis
- Dagger vs Luzmo
- Dagger vs Cyfe
- Dagger vs Hex
- Dagger vs Deepnote
- Dagger vs Grow
- Dagger vs Dundas BI
- Dagger vs Rill Data
- Dagger vs Fabi
- Dagger vs Stripe Dashboard
- Dagger vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Dagger vs Periscope Data
- Dagger vs Zoho Analytics
- Dagger vs Baremetrics
- Dagger vs Board International
- Dagger vs Cabin
- Reportz vs Earthly
- Reportz vs Buildkite
- Reportz vs Tilt
- Reportz vs Nixpacks
- Reportz vs Depot
- Reportz vs Blacksmith
- Reportz vs Jenkins
- Reportz vs WarpBuild
- Reportz vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Reportz vs GitLab
- Reportz vs ConfigCat
- Reportz vs Cortex
- Reportz vs Deep Code
- Reportz vs Deno
- Reportz vs Envoy
- Reportz vs Fig
- Reportz vs Docker
- Reportz vs Kubernetes
- Reportz vs Databox
- Reportz vs Klipfolio
- Reportz vs DashThis
- Reportz vs Luzmo
- Reportz vs Cyfe
- Reportz vs Hex
- Reportz vs Deepnote
- Reportz vs Grow
- Reportz vs Dundas BI
- Reportz vs Rill Data
- Reportz vs Fabi
- Reportz vs Stripe Dashboard
- Reportz vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Reportz vs Periscope Data
- Reportz vs Zoho Analytics
- Reportz vs Baremetrics
- Reportz vs Board International
- Reportz vs Cabin
