Is Flowise or Kogito better?

Neither clearly leads. Flowise starts at Free and Kogito at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Flowise or Kogito?

Flowise starts at Free and Kogito at Free.

Does Flowise or Kogito run on more platforms?

Flowise runs on Web. Kogito runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.

Can I use Flowise for free?

Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.

What is Flowise best used for?

Flowise is most often used for building multi-agent systems with orchestrated workflows, creating chatbots that retrieve knowledge from uploaded documents, implementing human-in-the-loop approval for ai agent decisions, deploying conversational ai without writing backend code. Of those, building multi-agent systems with orchestrated workflows and creating chatbots that retrieve knowledge from uploaded documents are not what Kogito is typically brought in for.

What can Flowise do that Kogito cannot?

Kogito covers Build-time code generation, Quarkus and Spring Boot support, DMN decision services, Drools rules engine.

Automation Integration · head to head

Flowise vs Kogito

Flowise

Automation Integration

Build AI Agents, Visually

From: Free
Rated: -

Full review Website

Kogito

Automation Integration

Cloud-native business automation for Quarkus, now an Apache KIE component

From: Free
Rated: -

Full review Website

The short version

Each has a real cost: Flowise enterprise tier requires custom pricing with no published rates; Kogito kogito is a developer framework, not a product, so there is no equivalent of Camunda Operate for business users and any process monitoring interface has to be built or bought separately.
Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Flowise and Kogito actually diverge.

Attributes where Flowise and Kogito differ
Attribute	Flowise	Kogito
Pricing model	freemium	Open source, no licence fee
Platforms	Web	Linux, Docker, Kubernetes

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Flowise

Nothing recorded that Kogito does not also cover.

Only in Kogito

Build-time code generation
Quarkus and Spring Boot support
DMN decision services
Drools rules engine
Serverless workflow
Kubernetes operator

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Flowise

Building multi-agent systems with orchestrated workflowsnot Kogito
Creating chatbots that retrieve knowledge from uploaded documentsnot Kogito
Implementing human-in-the-loop approval for AI agent decisionsnot Kogito
Deploying conversational AI without writing backend codenot Kogito

Kogito

A Quarkus microservice that must expose a DMN decision model as a REST endpoint with millisecond start-upnot Flowise
Serverless deployment of business rules where a traditional BPM server would be far too heavynot Flowise
A Red Hat shop that wants the upstream of Red Hat process automation with the option of a supported build laternot Flowise
Replacing hand-coded conditional logic with DMN tables that business analysts can review and amendnot Flowise

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Flowise

Enterprise tier requires custom pricing with no published rates

Kogito

Kogito is a developer framework, not a product, so there is no equivalent of Camunda Operate for business users and any process monitoring interface has to be built or bought separately.
Long-running stateful processes need external persistence and messaging that you configure and operate yourself, which removes much of the convenience a BPM server normally provides.
It sits inside the Apache KIE incubator, and incubating status means graduation is not guaranteed and the project name and artefact coordinates have already changed once.
Red Hat is by far the dominant contributor despite ASF stewardship, so the roadmap follows Red Hat product priorities rather than community demand.
Documentation is spread across legacy JBoss sites, the old Kogito site and the new Apache KIE site, and search results routinely land on outdated versions, which costs real time during adoption.

Pricing, plan by plan

Flowise

Free

FreeFree
- 2 Flows & Assistants
- 100 predictions per month
- 5 MB storage
Starter$35/month
- Unlimited flows & assistants
- 10,000 predictions per month
- 1 GB storage
Pro$65/month
- 50,000 predictions per month
- 10 GB storage
- Unlimited workspaces

Kogito

Free

KogitoFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Apache KIE incubating project
- No usage limits

Which should you pick?

Choose Flowise if

You want to start without paying.

Flowise review

Choose Kogito if

You need build-time code generation.
You want to start without paying.
You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
You also want quarkus and spring boot support.

Kogito review

Questions people ask

Is Flowise or Kogito better?: Neither clearly leads. Flowise starts at Free and Kogito at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Flowise or Kogito?: Flowise starts at Free and Kogito at Free.
Does Flowise or Kogito run on more platforms?: Flowise runs on Web. Kogito runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
Can I use Flowise for free?: Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Flowise best used for?: Flowise is most often used for building multi-agent systems with orchestrated workflows, creating chatbots that retrieve knowledge from uploaded documents, implementing human-in-the-loop approval for ai agent decisions, deploying conversational ai without writing backend code. Of those, building multi-agent systems with orchestrated workflows and creating chatbots that retrieve knowledge from uploaded documents are not what Kogito is typically brought in for.
What can Flowise do that Kogito cannot?: Kogito covers Build-time code generation, Quarkus and Spring Boot support, DMN decision services, Drools rules engine.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Flowise: Does Flowise have a free tier?

Yes, Flowise offers a free plan with 2 flows and assistants, 100 predictions per month, 5 MB storage, and community support.

Source

Kogito: Is Kogito still maintained?

Yes. It is an Apache KIE incubating project with active commits, with Red Hat as the dominant contributor.

Flowise: What is Flowise's Starter plan pricing?

The Starter plan costs $35 per month (first month free) and includes unlimited flows and assistants, 10,000 predictions per month, and 1 GB storage.

Source

Kogito: How does it differ from jBPM?

Kogito compiles process and rule definitions into application code at build time; jBPM was a runtime engine that loads definitions.

Flowise: How does Flowise charge for additional users?

Additional users on the Pro plan cost $15 per user per month. The Pro plan supports 5+ users with this per-user add-on pricing.

Source

Kogito: Does it need Quarkus?

It is designed for Quarkus and supports Spring Boot; both are Java frameworks rather than a standalone server.

Kogito: Is there commercial support?

Not from Apache. Red Hat sells supported builds of this lineage as part of its subscriptions.

Flowise vs Kogito

Flowise

Kogito

The short version

Where they differ

What each one covers

Only in Flowise

Only in Kogito

What people use each for

Flowise

Kogito

Where each one falls short

Flowise

Kogito

Pricing, plan by plan

Flowise

Kogito

Which should you pick?

Choose Flowise if

Choose Kogito if

Questions people ask

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Related pages

More on Flowise

More on Kogito

Keep looking

Other head to heads