Databases · head to head
Amazon Redshift vs Ninox

Amazon Redshift
Databases
Fast, scalable cloud data warehouse from AWS
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift on-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery; Ninox free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift and Ninox actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift | Ninox |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift
- Columnar Storage
- Massively Parallel
- Machine Learning
- AQUA Acceleration
- Data Sharing
- Federated Query
- Concurrency Scaling
- S3
Only in Ninox
Nothing recorded that Amazon Redshift does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift
- Business intelligencenot Ninox
- Data warehousingnot Ninox
- Real-time analyticsnot Ninox
- Reportingnot Ninox
- Machine learningnot Ninox
Ninox
- No-code database solutions for small to medium teamsnot Amazon Redshift
- Workflow automation and process managementnot Amazon Redshift
- Customer data and project tracking with custom viewsnot Amazon Redshift
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift
- On-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery
- Requires significant manual tuning including managing concurrency scaling costs and configuring Workload Management queues
- Performance degrades without proper design of distribution keys and sort keys
- Limited elastic resize options - can only halve or double current cluster size
- AWS lock-in makes it unsuitable for multi-cloud architectures
Ninox
- Free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- API call limits restrict automation on lower tiers (1,000/month free, 10,000/month team)
- Only 7-day history on free plan vs. unlimited on Business
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift
Free- Free TrialFree
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- 2 months free
- Full features
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Pay per node hour
- All features
- Standard support
Ninox
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 100 MB storage
- Up to 5,000 records
- Team$25/month
- 5 GB storage per user
- 50,000 records per user
- 10,000 API calls per user per month
- Business$40/month
- 10 GB storage per user
- 250,000 records per user
- 50,000 API calls per user per month
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing available
- Dedicated support
- Custom solutions and governance
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift if
- You need columnar storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want massively parallel.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift or Ninox better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Ninox at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift or Ninox?
- Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Ninox at Free.
- Does Amazon Redshift or Ninox run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Amazon Redshift for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Redshift best used for?
- Amazon Redshift is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what Ninox is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift do that Ninox cannot?
- Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Massively Parallel, Machine Learning, AQUA Acceleration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Redshift: What deployment options does Amazon Redshift offer?
Redshift offers Provisioned Cluster (with RA3 or DC2 nodes) and Serverless options to match varying workloads. The new Redshift RG instance family, powered by Graviton, delivers 2.4x faster performance than RA3 at 30% lower cost per vCPU.
SourceNinox: How much does Ninox cost?
Ninox is free for individuals with up to 5 users. Team plan is 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually), and Business plan is 40 EUR per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise plans have custom pricing.
SourceAmazon Redshift: What does Amazon Redshift cost?
Provisioned cluster pricing: RA3 on-demand starts at $1.086/hour for ra3.xlplus. Serverless costs approximately $0.375 per RPU-hour with 4-RPU minimum (roughly $1.50/hour active workload). Managed storage costs $0.024/GB-month.
SourceNinox: Is Ninox free?
Yes, Ninox offers a free plan for up to 5 users with 100 MB storage and 5,000 records. No payment required to start, and includes all core views: table, form, chart, kanban, maps, and calendar.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Does Redshift work with data lakes?
Yes, Redshift's integrated data lake query engine processes workloads on Apache Iceberg tables and other supported formats in Amazon S3, allowing you to run SQL analytics across your data warehouse and data lake from the same engine.
SourceNinox: What is Ninox Team plan pricing?
The Team plan costs 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually). It includes 5 GB storage per user, 50,000 records, 10,000 API calls per month per user, and 30-day history. Annual billing is required.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Is there a free tier for Amazon Redshift?
AWS offers a free trial with $300 USD in Serverless credits valid for 90 days, but Redshift is not part of the permanent AWS Free Tier.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Redshift
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift vs BigQuery
- Amazon Redshift vs Firebolt
- Amazon Redshift vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Redshift vs MotherDuck
- Amazon Redshift vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs TiDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Redshift vs TimescaleDB
- Amazon Redshift vs QuestDB
- Amazon Redshift vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Amazon Redshift vs Timeplus
- Amazon Redshift vs turbopuffer
- Amazon Redshift vs VerneMQ
- Amazon Redshift vs Vespa
- Amazon Redshift vs Xata
- Amazon Redshift vs Google Cloud SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs CosmosDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Pinot
- Amazon Redshift vs Airtable
- Amazon Redshift vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Redshift vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon Aurora
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Airflow
- Amazon Redshift vs Knack
- Amazon Redshift vs FaunaDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Readyset
- Amazon Redshift vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Redshift vs RabbitMQ
- Amazon Redshift vs Memcached
- Amazon Redshift vs Neo4j
- Amazon Redshift vs OpenSearch
- Amazon Redshift vs Qdrant
- Amazon Redshift vs SingleStore
- Amazon Redshift vs Cassandra
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Kafka
- Ninox vs BigQuery
- Ninox vs Firebolt
- Ninox vs ClickHouse
- Ninox vs MotherDuck
- Ninox vs Azure SQL
- Ninox vs TiDB
- Ninox vs Apache Druid
- Ninox vs TimescaleDB
- Ninox vs QuestDB
- Ninox vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Ninox vs Timeplus
- Ninox vs turbopuffer
- Ninox vs VerneMQ
- Ninox vs Vespa
- Ninox vs Xata
- Ninox vs Google Cloud SQL
- Ninox vs CosmosDB
- Ninox vs Apache Pinot
- Ninox vs Airtable
- Ninox vs Cockroach Labs
- Ninox vs PostgreSQL
- Ninox vs Amazon Aurora
- Ninox vs Apache Airflow
- Ninox vs Knack
- Ninox vs FaunaDB
- Ninox vs Readyset
- Ninox vs Elasticsearch
- Ninox vs RabbitMQ
- Ninox vs Memcached
- Ninox vs Neo4j
- Ninox vs OpenSearch
- Ninox vs Qdrant
- Ninox vs SingleStore
- Ninox vs Cassandra
- Ninox vs Apache Kafka

