Software · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs CosmosDB
CosmosDB
Software
Globally distributed, multi-model database service from Azure
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); CosmosDB autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used
- They diverge on capability: Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, CosmosDB covers Global Distribution.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and CosmosDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | CosmosDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | usage-based |
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Web, Azure |
| Founded | 2015 | 1975 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in CosmosDB
- Global Distribution
- Multi-model APIs
- Elastic Scaling
- Five Consistency Levels
- SLA-backed Latency
- Automatic Indexing
- Serverless
- Azure Functions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot CosmosDB
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot CosmosDB
CosmosDB
- Running a globally distributed multi model database on Azurenot Cockroach Labs
- Serving low latency reads and writes from multiple Azure regionsnot Cockroach Labs
- Storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed servicenot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
CosmosDB
- Autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used
- Provisioned throughput is charged in every region the account is replicated to, so multi region accounts multiply the RU bill
- Storage charges cover data, indexes and backups in each replicated region
- Egress out of Azure and between regions is charged, though ingress is free
- The free allowance is one account per Azure subscription, limited to 1,000 RU/s and 25 GB
- RU/s rates vary by region and are only shown through the pricing calculator rather than a flat published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
CosmosDB
Free- Free TierFree
- 1000 RU/s
- 25GB storage
- First 12 months
- ServerlessFree
- Pay per request
- Auto-scaling
- Event-driven workloads
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose CosmosDB if
- You need global distribution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Azure.
- You also want multi-model apis.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or CosmosDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and CosmosDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or CosmosDB?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and CosmosDB at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or CosmosDB run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. CosmosDB runs on Web, Azure.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what CosmosDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that CosmosDB cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. CosmosDB covers Global Distribution, Multi-model APIs, Elastic Scaling, Five Consistency Levels.
Related pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Airtable
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs PlanetScale
- Cockroach Labs vs Azure SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs ClickHouse
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs DuckDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DynamoDB
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Redshift
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Druid
- Cockroach Labs vs Cassandra
- Cockroach Labs vs CouchDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Firebolt
- CosmosDB vs PostgreSQL
- CosmosDB vs Airtable
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Aurora
- CosmosDB vs Elasticsearch
- CosmosDB vs PlanetScale
- CosmosDB vs Azure SQL
- CosmosDB vs ClickHouse
- CosmosDB vs Couchbase
- CosmosDB vs DuckDB
- CosmosDB vs DynamoDB
- CosmosDB vs MariaDB
- CosmosDB vs Oracle Database
- CosmosDB vs Amazon RDS
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Redshift
- CosmosDB vs Apache Druid
- CosmosDB vs Cassandra
- CosmosDB vs CouchDB
- CosmosDB vs Firebolt

