Databases · head to head
CosmosDB vs Neo4j

CosmosDB
Databases
Globally distributed, multi-model database service from Azure
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CosmosDB autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used; Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- They diverge on capability: CosmosDB covers Global Distribution, Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CosmosDB and Neo4j actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CosmosDB
- Global Distribution
- Multi-model APIs
- Elastic Scaling
- Five Consistency Levels
- SLA-backed Latency
- Automatic Indexing
- Serverless
- Azure Functions
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CosmosDB
- Running a globally distributed multi model database on Azurenot Neo4j
- Serving low latency reads and writes from multiple Azure regionsnot Neo4j
- Storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed servicenot Neo4j
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot CosmosDB
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot CosmosDB
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot CosmosDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CosmosDB
- Autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used
- Provisioned throughput is charged in every region the account is replicated to, so multi region accounts multiply the RU bill
- Storage charges cover data, indexes and backups in each replicated region
- Egress out of Azure and between regions is charged, though ingress is free
- The free allowance is one account per Azure subscription, limited to 1,000 RU/s and 25 GB
- RU/s rates vary by region and are only shown through the pricing calculator rather than a flat published rate
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Pricing, plan by plan
CosmosDB
Free- Free TierFree
- 1000 RU/s
- 25GB storage
- First 12 months
- ServerlessFree
- Pay per request
- Auto-scaling
- Event-driven workloads
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/GB/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/GB/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated Cloud$null/custom
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
Which should you pick?
Choose CosmosDB if
- You need global distribution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Azure.
- You also want multi-model apis.
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Questions people ask
- Is CosmosDB or Neo4j better?
- Neither clearly leads. CosmosDB starts at Free and Neo4j at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CosmosDB or Neo4j?
- CosmosDB starts at Free and Neo4j at Free.
- Does CosmosDB or Neo4j run on more platforms?
- CosmosDB runs on Web, Azure. Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- Can I use CosmosDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CosmosDB best used for?
- CosmosDB is most often used for running a globally distributed multi model database on azure, serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions, storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed service. Of those, running a globally distributed multi model database on azure and serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions are not what Neo4j is typically brought in for.
- What can CosmosDB do that Neo4j cannot?
- CosmosDB covers Global Distribution, Multi-model APIs, Elastic Scaling, Five Consistency Levels. Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CosmosDB: Is there a free tier for Azure Cosmos DB?
Yes, Cosmos DB offers a free tier with 1,000 RU/s of throughput and 25 GB of storage per month for the lifetime of the account, available to new accounts.
SourceNeo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceCosmosDB: How is Cosmos DB priced after the free tier?
Cosmos DB uses three billing models: provisioned throughput billed per request unit per second, vCore pricing for certain APIs, or serverless consumption pricing where you pay only for requests processed. Reserved capacity offers 20% discount for one year or 30% for three years.
SourceNeo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceCosmosDB: Can I change my pricing model after choosing one?
No. Once you select a compute pricing model and API, they cannot be changed. This choice is permanent for that database.
SourceNeo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceCosmosDB: Is there a trial period for Cosmos DB beyond the free tier?
Azure offers a 30-day free trial account for all Azure services. Additionally, Azure AI customers may be eligible for a 90-day free Cosmos DB subscription through the Azure AI Advantage program.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Aurora
- CosmosDB vs Cockroach Labs
- CosmosDB vs Airtable
- CosmosDB vs PostgreSQL
- CosmosDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- CosmosDB vs ArangoDB
- CosmosDB vs DataStax
- CosmosDB vs FaunaDB
- CosmosDB vs Firebolt
- CosmosDB vs turbopuffer
- CosmosDB vs VerneMQ
- CosmosDB vs Vespa
- CosmosDB vs Xata
- CosmosDB vs YugabyteDB
- CosmosDB vs Zilliz
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Redshift
- CosmosDB vs BigQuery
- CosmosDB vs Amazon RDS
- CosmosDB vs Elasticsearch
- CosmosDB vs Dgraph
- CosmosDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- CosmosDB vs Couchbase
- CosmosDB vs Cassandra
- CosmosDB vs Valkey
- CosmosDB vs Canary Labs
- CosmosDB vs Chroma
- CosmosDB vs DynamoDB
- CosmosDB vs CouchDB
- CosmosDB vs Apache Doris
- CosmosDB vs Apache Solr
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Google Cloud SQL
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs DataStax
- Neo4j vs FaunaDB
- Neo4j vs Firebolt
- Neo4j vs turbopuffer
- Neo4j vs VerneMQ
- Neo4j vs Vespa
- Neo4j vs Xata
- Neo4j vs YugabyteDB
- Neo4j vs Zilliz
- Neo4j vs Amazon Redshift
- Neo4j vs BigQuery
- Neo4j vs Amazon RDS
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs Valkey
- Neo4j vs Canary Labs
- Neo4j vs Chroma
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Doris
- Neo4j vs Apache Solr

