Construction · head to head
CMiC vs Sitemark

Sitemark
Construction
Drone-based progress tracking, quality control and commissioning built specifically for solar farms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CMiC no specific pricing disclosed on website; Sitemark it only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- They diverge on capability: CMiC covers Project management, Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CMiC and Sitemark actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, Ios, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CMiC
- Project management
- Accounting
- Document management
- Job costing
- Field operations
- QuickBooks
- Sage
- Microsoft 365
Only in Sitemark
- Construction progress tracking
- As-built versus design comparison
- Thermographic inspection
- Defect localisation
- Commissioning workflows
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
- Drone and robotics ingestion
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CMiC
- Insurance and risk managementnot Sitemark
- Professional liability coveragenot Sitemark
- Construction industry insurancenot Sitemark
Sitemark
- An EPC contractor on a multi-hundred-megawatt ground-mount plant that must report weekly installed counts to a lender and cannot do it by walking the rowsnot CMiC
- An asset owner accepting a plant at provisional acceptance who needs documented evidence that what was built matches the issued design before signingnot CMiC
- An operations team running annual thermographic inspection across a portfolio, wanting defects mapped to module positions so a technician goes straight to the faultnot CMiC
- A developer comparing defect and underperformance rates across contractors and module suppliers to inform the next procurement roundnot CMiC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CMiC
- No specific pricing disclosed on website
- Website directs users to /pricing page for quotes only
- Custom quoting model used for all customers
- No tiered plans or standard pricing published
Sitemark
- It only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- Pricing is quoted on site count and unpublished variables, which penalises owners of many small distributed assets relative to one operator of a single large plant with the same total capacity.
- You still need someone to fly the site, and Sitemark does not remove the drone operator cost, permits or airspace constraints; it monetises the data after the flight.
- Automated progress counting depends on a clean, current design layout, and on projects where the layout changes weekly the comparison generates false deviations that erode trust in the numbers.
- Thermographic defect detection needs the plant producing at sufficient irradiance, so inspection windows in northern latitudes are narrow and a missed window pushes findings into the next season.
Pricing, plan by plan
CMiC
$300/month- Core$300/month
- Project management
- Accounting
- Document management
- EnterpriseFree
- Mobile field app
- Advanced analytics
- API access
Sitemark
On request- Sitemark Construction$undefined/year
- Priced on number of sites and other variables
- Progress tracking across construction activities
- As-built versus design quality control
- Sitemark Operations$undefined/year
- Thermographic inspection and defect detection
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose CMiC if
- You need project management.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want accounting.
Choose Sitemark if
- You need construction progress tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want as-built versus design comparison.
Questions people ask
- Is CMiC or Sitemark better?
- Neither clearly leads. CMiC starts at $300/month and Sitemark at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CMiC or Sitemark?
- CMiC starts at $300/month and Sitemark at On request.
- Does CMiC or Sitemark run on more platforms?
- CMiC runs on Web, Ios, Android. Sitemark runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is CMiC best used for?
- CMiC is most often used for insurance and risk management, professional liability coverage, construction industry insurance. Of those, insurance and risk management and professional liability coverage are not what Sitemark is typically brought in for.
- What can CMiC do that Sitemark cannot?
- CMiC covers Project management, Accounting, Document management, Job costing. Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking, As-built versus design comparison, Thermographic inspection, Defect localisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CMiC: How much does CMiC cost?
CMiC does not publish fixed pricing on its website. The company uses a custom quote model. Interested parties must visit the /pricing page or contact CMiC directly to request a quote for their specific needs.
SourceSitemark: Is Sitemark priced per megawatt?
No. Sitemark states pricing is based on number of sites and other variables. Ask explicitly how a portfolio of small sites is treated, because per-site pricing is unkind to distributed assets.
CMiC: What is CMiC's pricing model?
CMiC uses a custom enterprise pricing model rather than published tiered plans. All pricing is determined on a case-by-case basis through their sales team.
SourceSitemark: Do we have to use Sitemark drone pilots?
No. It accepts data from third-party drone operators, which lets you keep an existing flight contractor.
Sitemark: Does it cover anything other than solar?
No. It is built specifically around solar plant structures and defect types.
Sitemark: Can we export our data?
Yes, orthomosaics, defect lists and reports export. Confirm the format and whether historical inspections remain accessible after a subscription lapses.
Sitemark: Where is the company based?
Leuven, Belgium, with customers across Europe, the Middle East, Asia and the Americas.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CMiC vs Procore
- CMiC vs SketchUp
- CMiC vs ArchiCAD
- CMiC vs Autodesk Revit
- CMiC vs Jonas Premier
- CMiC vs Viewpoint Vista
- CMiC vs e-Builder
- CMiC vs Sage 300 Construction
- CMiC vs Foundation Software
- CMiC vs Adaptive
- CMiC vs HCSS
- CMiC vs Primavera P6
- CMiC vs Builderbox
- CMiC vs Buildots
- CMiC vs Buildxact
- CMiC vs Chief Architect
- CMiC vs Clearstory
- CMiC vs CoConstruct
- CMiC vs Reconstruct
- CMiC vs Dalux
- CMiC vs Propeller Aero
- CMiC vs Skydio Dock for X10
- CMiC vs B2W Estimate
- CMiC vs HCSS HeavyBid
- CMiC vs Smartsheet
- CMiC vs Vectorworks Architect
- CMiC vs Buildertrend
- CMiC vs Document Crunch
- CMiC vs GCPay
- CMiC vs HammerTech
- CMiC vs Handoff
- CMiC vs Houzz Pro
- Sitemark vs Procore
- Sitemark vs SketchUp
- Sitemark vs ArchiCAD
- Sitemark vs Autodesk Revit
- Sitemark vs Jonas Premier
- Sitemark vs Viewpoint Vista
- Sitemark vs e-Builder
- Sitemark vs Sage 300 Construction
- Sitemark vs Foundation Software
- Sitemark vs Adaptive
- Sitemark vs HCSS
- Sitemark vs Primavera P6
- Sitemark vs Builderbox
- Sitemark vs Buildots
- Sitemark vs Buildxact
- Sitemark vs Chief Architect
- Sitemark vs Clearstory
- Sitemark vs CoConstruct
- Sitemark vs Reconstruct
- Sitemark vs Dalux
- Sitemark vs Propeller Aero
- Sitemark vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Sitemark vs B2W Estimate
- Sitemark vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Sitemark vs Smartsheet
- Sitemark vs Vectorworks Architect
- Sitemark vs Buildertrend
- Sitemark vs Document Crunch
- Sitemark vs GCPay
- Sitemark vs HammerTech
- Sitemark vs Handoff
- Sitemark vs Houzz Pro

