Softwr

Construction · pricing

Sitemark pricing

Sitemark publishes 2 tiers. Below is each one, what it adds over the tier beneath it, and where the ladder stops being worth climbing for most people.

As of 1 September 2026, Sitemark pricing is on request across 2 published tiers. Figures are the vendor's list prices as recorded on this page's last check; the vendor's site is the final word.

Entry price
On request
Model
Quote
Tiers
2
Free tier
Not on record

Sitemark plans, side by side

Every published tier in ascending order of price, with the number of features each one lists. An absence here means the record does not itemise it, not that the tier lacks it.

Sitemark pricing tiers
PlanPriceFeatures listedStep up from the tier below
Sitemark ConstructionOn request4Entry tier
Sitemark OperationsOn request4Priced on request

What each tier adds

The set difference between each tier's feature list and the one beneath it. Where a tier lists nothing new, the vendor has either stopped repeating the inherited list or the tier raises limits rather than adding capability, the record does not distinguish the two, so this page does not either.

Sitemark Construction

On request

The entry tier. It covers priced on number of sites and other variables, progress tracking across construction activities, as-built versus design quality control, commissioning workflows.

Sitemark Operations

On request

Over Sitemark Construction, this tier adds:

  • Thermographic inspection and defect detection
  • Ticketing and work management
  • Portfolio dashboards
  • Asset register

What the product covers

The full Sitemark feature record, grouped as the catalogue groups it. This is the product as a whole; the record does not map every feature onto a specific tier.

Other

  • Construction progress tracking
  • As-built versus design comparison
  • Thermographic inspection
  • Defect localisation
  • Commissioning workflows
  • Ticketing and work management
  • Portfolio dashboards
  • Drone and robotics ingestion

People bring Sitemark in for an epc contractor on a multi-hundred-megawatt ground-mount plant that must report weekly installed counts to a lender and cannot do it by walking the rows, an asset owner accepting a plant at provisional acceptance who needs documented evidence that what was built matches the issued design before signing, an operations team running annual thermographic inspection across a portfolio, wanting defects mapped to module positions so a technician goes straight to the fault, a developer comparing defect and underperformance rates across contractors and module suppliers to inform the next procurement round. If that is not the job you are buying for, the alternatives to Sitemark are worth a look before you commit to a tier.

How that compares in Construction

Too few construction tools in this directory publish a starting price to quote a meaningful median, so the table below is a like-for-like list rather than a ranking.

Sitemark entry price against other Construction tools
ToolEntry priceModelRatedHead to head
Sitemark (this page)On requestquote-
BuildotsOn requestquote-vs Sitemark
AdaptiveOn requestquote-vs Sitemark
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementOn requestPercentage of subcontract value, plus a quoted contractor subscription-vs Sitemark
Handoff$119/monthPer company per month-vs Sitemark
GCPayOn requestquote-vs Sitemark
ALICE TechnologiesOn requestquote-vs Sitemark

Ratings are aggregated from third-party sources and imported with each catalogue entry, they are not reviews hosted on Softwr. How each figure is used is set out on the Sitemark badges page.

Before you pay for Sitemark

Three things this page cannot tell you, and all three change the bill. The record carries a price and a billing period but not the unit - per-seat and flat-rate pricing are indistinguishable in this data, so a five-person team may be looking at five times the figure above. It carries no annual rate, so any discount for paying yearly is not something this page can quote. And it carries no trial length.

What it can tell you is the shape of the ladder: 2 tiers between On request and On request, with the jump itemised above. With no free tier on record, the cheapest way to answer the rest is to compare Sitemark against the tools that do have one before committing.

Sitemark runs on web, ios, android, and is published by Sitemark of Leuven, Flanders, Belgium. The full record is on the Sitemark review, and the rest of the category is under best construction tools.

Sitemark pricing on the vendor's own site

Sitemark pricing questions

How much does Sitemark cost?
Sitemark publishes 2 tiers, from On request for Sitemark Construction up to On request for Sitemark Operations. The cheapest paid tier is On request.
Does Sitemark have a free plan?
Not on the record we hold: Sitemark is listed as quote. Whether a free trial is offered is not something this record captures, so check the vendor's site.
What is the difference between Sitemark Construction and Sitemark Operations on Sitemark?
Sitemark Operations costs On request against On request, and adds thermographic inspection and defect detection, ticketing and work management, portfolio dashboards, asset register.
What am I actually paying for with Sitemark?
The record lists 8 features across 1 area: other. In practice it is brought in for an epc contractor on a multi-hundred-megawatt ground-mount plant that must report weekly installed counts to a lender and cannot do it by walking the rows, an asset owner accepting a plant at provisional acceptance who needs documented evidence that what was built matches the issued design before signing, an operations team running annual thermographic inspection across a portfolio, wanting defects mapped to module positions so a technician goes straight to the fault.
Does Sitemark charge per user?
The record carries a price and a billing period for each of its 2 tiers, but not the unit that price is charged in. Per-seat and flat-rate billing look identical in this data, so check the vendor's page before budgeting for a team.
Are these Sitemark prices current?
They are what the catalogue entry holds, refreshed when the entry is. Vendors change pricing without notice and nobody at Softwr re-verifies each tier by hand, so treat this as a structured summary and the vendor's own pricing page as the authority.
What should I compare Sitemark against before paying?
The closest construction tools in this directory are Buildots, Adaptive, Oracle Textura Payment Management, Handoff. Each has a side-by-side comparison with Sitemark covering price, platforms and features.

Related pages