Construction · head to head
Sage 300 Construction vs Sitemark

Sage 300 Construction
Construction
Cloud-based construction ERP software
- From
- $400/month
- Rated
- -

Sitemark
Construction
Drone-based progress tracking, quality control and commissioning built specifically for solar farms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Sage 300 Construction the Internet Archive's capture of Sage's product page on 25 December 2019 confirmed Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate as a distinct 'Other products' entry separate from the mainline Sage 300cloud accounting product, with no price figure published for either.; Sitemark it only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- They diverge on capability: Sage 300 Construction covers Project management, Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sage 300 Construction and Sitemark actually diverge.
| Attribute | Sage 300 Construction | Sitemark |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $400/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Windows | Web, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 1981 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sage 300 Construction
- Project management
- Accounting
- Job costing
- Payroll
- Equipment management
- QuickBooks
- Microsoft 365
- Stripe
Only in Sitemark
- Construction progress tracking
- As-built versus design comparison
- Thermographic inspection
- Defect localisation
- Commissioning workflows
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
- Drone and robotics ingestion
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sage 300 Construction
- Financial managementnot Sitemark
- Job costingnot Sitemark
- Payrollnot Sitemark
- Equipment trackingnot Sitemark
Sitemark
- An EPC contractor on a multi-hundred-megawatt ground-mount plant that must report weekly installed counts to a lender and cannot do it by walking the rowsnot Sage 300 Construction
- An asset owner accepting a plant at provisional acceptance who needs documented evidence that what was built matches the issued design before signingnot Sage 300 Construction
- An operations team running annual thermographic inspection across a portfolio, wanting defects mapped to module positions so a technician goes straight to the faultnot Sage 300 Construction
- A developer comparing defect and underperformance rates across contractors and module suppliers to inform the next procurement roundnot Sage 300 Construction
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sage 300 Construction
- The Internet Archive's capture of Sage's product page on 25 December 2019 confirmed Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate as a distinct 'Other products' entry separate from the mainline Sage 300cloud accounting product, with no price figure published for either.
Sitemark
- It only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- Pricing is quoted on site count and unpublished variables, which penalises owners of many small distributed assets relative to one operator of a single large plant with the same total capacity.
- You still need someone to fly the site, and Sitemark does not remove the drone operator cost, permits or airspace constraints; it monetises the data after the flight.
- Automated progress counting depends on a clean, current design layout, and on projects where the layout changes weekly the comparison generates false deviations that erode trust in the numbers.
- Thermographic defect detection needs the plant producing at sufficient irradiance, so inspection windows in northern latitudes are narrow and a missed window pushes findings into the next season.
Pricing, plan by plan
Sage 300 Construction
$400/month- Professional$400/month
- Project management
- Accounting
- Job costing
- EnterpriseFree
- Equipment management
- Advanced analytics
- Custom workflows
Sitemark
On request- Sitemark Construction$undefined/year
- Priced on number of sites and other variables
- Progress tracking across construction activities
- As-built versus design quality control
- Sitemark Operations$undefined/year
- Thermographic inspection and defect detection
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose Sage 300 Construction if
- You need project management.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want accounting.
Choose Sitemark if
- You need construction progress tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want as-built versus design comparison.
Questions people ask
- Is Sage 300 Construction or Sitemark better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sage 300 Construction starts at $400/month and Sitemark at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sage 300 Construction or Sitemark?
- Sage 300 Construction starts at $400/month and Sitemark at On request.
- Does Sage 300 Construction or Sitemark run on more platforms?
- Sage 300 Construction runs on Web, Windows. Sitemark runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Sage 300 Construction best used for?
- Sage 300 Construction is most often used for financial management, job costing, payroll, equipment tracking. Of those, financial management and job costing are not what Sitemark is typically brought in for.
- What can Sage 300 Construction do that Sitemark cannot?
- Sage 300 Construction covers Project management, Accounting, Job costing, Payroll. Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking, As-built versus design comparison, Thermographic inspection, Defect localisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sitemark: Is Sitemark priced per megawatt?
No. Sitemark states pricing is based on number of sites and other variables. Ask explicitly how a portfolio of small sites is treated, because per-site pricing is unkind to distributed assets.
Sitemark: Do we have to use Sitemark drone pilots?
No. It accepts data from third-party drone operators, which lets you keep an existing flight contractor.
Sitemark: Does it cover anything other than solar?
No. It is built specifically around solar plant structures and defect types.
Sitemark: Can we export our data?
Yes, orthomosaics, defect lists and reports export. Confirm the format and whether historical inspections remain accessible after a subscription lapses.
Sitemark: Where is the company based?
Leuven, Belgium, with customers across Europe, the Middle East, Asia and the Americas.
Related pages
More on Sage 300 Construction
Other head to heads
- Sage 300 Construction vs Procore
- Sage 300 Construction vs Foundation Software
- Sage 300 Construction vs Trimble Pay
- Sage 300 Construction vs Adaptive
- Sage 300 Construction vs ArchiCAD
- Sage 300 Construction vs Autodesk Revit
- Sage 300 Construction vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Sage 300 Construction vs Billd
- Sage 300 Construction vs Viewpoint Vista
- Sage 300 Construction vs Jonas Premier
- Sage 300 Construction vs e-Builder
- Sage 300 Construction vs Kahua
- Sage 300 Construction vs Kojo
- Sage 300 Construction vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Sage 300 Construction vs SketchUp
- Sage 300 Construction vs Navisworks
- Sage 300 Construction vs Newforma
- Sage 300 Construction vs Reconstruct
- Sage 300 Construction vs Dalux
- Sage 300 Construction vs Buildots
- Sage 300 Construction vs Propeller Aero
- Sage 300 Construction vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Sage 300 Construction vs B2W Estimate
- Sage 300 Construction vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Sage 300 Construction vs Primavera P6
- Sage 300 Construction vs Smartsheet
- Sage 300 Construction vs Vectorworks Architect
- Sage 300 Construction vs Buildertrend
- Sage 300 Construction vs Document Crunch
- Sage 300 Construction vs GCPay
- Sage 300 Construction vs HammerTech
- Sage 300 Construction vs Handoff
- Sage 300 Construction vs Houzz Pro
- Sitemark vs Procore
- Sitemark vs Foundation Software
- Sitemark vs Trimble Pay
- Sitemark vs Adaptive
- Sitemark vs ArchiCAD
- Sitemark vs Autodesk Revit
- Sitemark vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Sitemark vs Billd
- Sitemark vs Viewpoint Vista
- Sitemark vs Jonas Premier
- Sitemark vs e-Builder
- Sitemark vs Kahua
- Sitemark vs Kojo
- Sitemark vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Sitemark vs SketchUp
- Sitemark vs Navisworks
- Sitemark vs Newforma
- Sitemark vs Reconstruct
- Sitemark vs Dalux
- Sitemark vs Buildots
- Sitemark vs Propeller Aero
- Sitemark vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Sitemark vs B2W Estimate
- Sitemark vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Sitemark vs Primavera P6
- Sitemark vs Smartsheet
- Sitemark vs Vectorworks Architect
- Sitemark vs Buildertrend
- Sitemark vs Document Crunch
- Sitemark vs GCPay
- Sitemark vs HammerTech
- Sitemark vs Handoff
- Sitemark vs Houzz Pro
