Construction · head to head
Chief Architect vs Sitemark

Chief Architect
Construction
Professional home design and construction software
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sitemark
Construction
Drone-based progress tracking, quality control and commissioning built specifically for solar farms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Chief Architect has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Chief Architect no free tier after trial; Sitemark it only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- They diverge on capability: Chief Architect covers 2D and 3D design, Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chief Architect and Sitemark actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chief Architect | Sitemark |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Windows, Mac | Web, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 1991 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chief Architect
- 2D and 3D design
- Floor plan creation
- Construction documentation
- Material lists
- Rendering
- Revit
- SketchUp
- CAD
Only in Sitemark
- Construction progress tracking
- As-built versus design comparison
- Thermographic inspection
- Defect localisation
- Commissioning workflows
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
- Drone and robotics ingestion
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chief Architect
- Home design and architectural planningnot Sitemark
- Kitchen and bathroom designnot Sitemark
- Interior design and remodelingnot Sitemark
- Professional building designnot Sitemark
Sitemark
- An EPC contractor on a multi-hundred-megawatt ground-mount plant that must report weekly installed counts to a lender and cannot do it by walking the rowsnot Chief Architect
- An asset owner accepting a plant at provisional acceptance who needs documented evidence that what was built matches the issued design before signingnot Chief Architect
- An operations team running annual thermographic inspection across a portfolio, wanting defects mapped to module positions so a technician goes straight to the faultnot Chief Architect
- A developer comparing defect and underperformance rates across contractors and module suppliers to inform the next procurement roundnot Chief Architect
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chief Architect
- No free tier after trial
- Monthly subscription at $229/month is significantly higher than annual equivalent ($166.25/month)
- Trial download available but duration and features not specified
- No mention of team or multi-user plans
Sitemark
- It only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- Pricing is quoted on site count and unpublished variables, which penalises owners of many small distributed assets relative to one operator of a single large plant with the same total capacity.
- You still need someone to fly the site, and Sitemark does not remove the drone operator cost, permits or airspace constraints; it monetises the data after the flight.
- Automated progress counting depends on a clean, current design layout, and on projects where the layout changes weekly the comparison generates false deviations that erode trust in the numbers.
- Thermographic defect detection needs the plant producing at sufficient irradiance, so inspection windows in northern latitudes are narrow and a missed window pushes findings into the next season.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chief Architect
Free- Monthly Subscription$229/month
- Software upgrades
- Premium catalog downloads
- Priority technical support
- Annual Subscription$1995/year
- 27% savings vs monthly
- All monthly benefits included
- Legacy License Upgrade$995/year
- 50% discount first year
- Then $1,995/year
- For existing Chief Architect users
Sitemark
On request- Sitemark Construction$undefined/year
- Priced on number of sites and other variables
- Progress tracking across construction activities
- As-built versus design quality control
- Sitemark Operations$undefined/year
- Thermographic inspection and defect detection
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose Chief Architect if
- You need 2d and 3d design.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Mac.
- You also want floor plan creation.
Choose Sitemark if
- You need construction progress tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want as-built versus design comparison.
Questions people ask
- Is Chief Architect or Sitemark better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chief Architect starts at Free and Sitemark at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chief Architect or Sitemark?
- Chief Architect has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Chief Architect and On request for Sitemark.
- Does Chief Architect or Sitemark run on more platforms?
- Chief Architect runs on Windows, Mac. Sitemark runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Chief Architect for free?
- Yes. Chief Architect has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sitemark starts at On request.
- What is Chief Architect best used for?
- Chief Architect is most often used for home design and architectural planning, kitchen and bathroom design, interior design and remodeling, professional building design. Of those, home design and architectural planning and kitchen and bathroom design are not what Sitemark is typically brought in for.
- What can Chief Architect do that Sitemark cannot?
- Chief Architect covers 2D and 3D design, Floor plan creation, Construction documentation, Material lists. Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking, As-built versus design comparison, Thermographic inspection, Defect localisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chief Architect: How much does Chief Architect cost?
Chief Architect costs $229/month on a monthly subscription, or $1,995/year ($166.25/month equivalent) for annual billing, representing a 27% discount.
SourceSitemark: Is Sitemark priced per megawatt?
No. Sitemark states pricing is based on number of sites and other variables. Ask explicitly how a portfolio of small sites is treated, because per-site pricing is unkind to distributed assets.
Chief Architect: Is there a free trial available?
Yes, a free trial download is available for prospective customers to evaluate Chief Architect before purchase.
SourceSitemark: Do we have to use Sitemark drone pilots?
No. It accepts data from third-party drone operators, which lets you keep an existing flight contractor.
Chief Architect: Is there a discount for existing Chief Architect license holders?
Yes, legacy license holders can upgrade to an annual subscription for $995 the first year (50% discount), then $1,995/year thereafter.
SourceSitemark: Does it cover anything other than solar?
No. It is built specifically around solar plant structures and defect types.
Chief Architect: What is included in the subscription?
Chief Architect subscription includes software upgrades, premium catalog downloads for design assets, and priority technical support.
SourceSitemark: Can we export our data?
Yes, orthomosaics, defect lists and reports export. Confirm the format and whether historical inspections remain accessible after a subscription lapses.
Sitemark: Where is the company based?
Leuven, Belgium, with customers across Europe, the Middle East, Asia and the Americas.
Related pages
More on Chief Architect
Other head to heads
- Chief Architect vs ArchiCAD
- Chief Architect vs SketchUp
- Chief Architect vs Autodesk Revit
- Chief Architect vs Procore
- Chief Architect vs Raken
- Chief Architect vs Vectorworks Architect
- Chief Architect vs CoConstruct
- Chief Architect vs Houzz Pro
- Chief Architect vs Buildertrend
- Chief Architect vs Sage 300 Construction
- Chief Architect vs Openspace
- Chief Architect vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Chief Architect vs Reconstruct
- Chief Architect vs Smartsheet Construction
- Chief Architect vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Chief Architect vs Trimble Pay
- Chief Architect vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Chief Architect vs Sage Estimating
- Chief Architect vs Dalux
- Chief Architect vs Buildots
- Chief Architect vs Propeller Aero
- Chief Architect vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Chief Architect vs B2W Estimate
- Chief Architect vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Chief Architect vs Primavera P6
- Chief Architect vs Smartsheet
- Chief Architect vs Adaptive
- Chief Architect vs Document Crunch
- Chief Architect vs GCPay
- Chief Architect vs HammerTech
- Chief Architect vs Handoff
- Sitemark vs ArchiCAD
- Sitemark vs SketchUp
- Sitemark vs Autodesk Revit
- Sitemark vs Procore
- Sitemark vs Raken
- Sitemark vs Vectorworks Architect
- Sitemark vs CoConstruct
- Sitemark vs Houzz Pro
- Sitemark vs Buildertrend
- Sitemark vs Sage 300 Construction
- Sitemark vs Openspace
- Sitemark vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Sitemark vs Reconstruct
- Sitemark vs Smartsheet Construction
- Sitemark vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Sitemark vs Trimble Pay
- Sitemark vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Sitemark vs Sage Estimating
- Sitemark vs Dalux
- Sitemark vs Buildots
- Sitemark vs Propeller Aero
- Sitemark vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Sitemark vs B2W Estimate
- Sitemark vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Sitemark vs Primavera P6
- Sitemark vs Smartsheet
- Sitemark vs Adaptive
- Sitemark vs Document Crunch
- Sitemark vs GCPay
- Sitemark vs HammerTech
- Sitemark vs Handoff
