Construction · head to head
Houzz Pro vs Sitemark

Houzz Pro
Construction
Business management platform for home builders and remodelers
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sitemark
Construction
Drone-based progress tracking, quality control and commissioning built specifically for solar farms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Houzz Pro has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Houzz Pro the Pro plan includes only 1 seat and additional users cost $60 per user per month; Sitemark it only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- They diverge on capability: Houzz Pro covers Project management, Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Houzz Pro and Sitemark actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web, Ios, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Houzz Pro
- Project management
- Client communication
- Portfolio management
- Lead management
- Budgeting
- QuickBooks
- Square
- Stripe
Only in Sitemark
- Construction progress tracking
- As-built versus design comparison
- Thermographic inspection
- Defect localisation
- Commissioning workflows
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
- Drone and robotics ingestion
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Houzz Pro
- Generating remodeling and design leads from a Houzz professional profilenot Sitemark
- Producing estimates, proposals and change orders for residential design and build projectsnot Sitemark
- Running client-facing selection boards and 3D floor plans for interior designersnot Sitemark
Sitemark
- An EPC contractor on a multi-hundred-megawatt ground-mount plant that must report weekly installed counts to a lender and cannot do it by walking the rowsnot Houzz Pro
- An asset owner accepting a plant at provisional acceptance who needs documented evidence that what was built matches the issued design before signingnot Houzz Pro
- An operations team running annual thermographic inspection across a portfolio, wanting defects mapped to module positions so a technician goes straight to the faultnot Houzz Pro
- A developer comparing defect and underperformance rates across contractors and module suppliers to inform the next procurement roundnot Houzz Pro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Houzz Pro
- The Pro plan includes only 1 seat and additional users cost $60 per user per month
- Plans are gated by annual project volume, with Pro limited to up to $500,000, Custom covering $500,000 to $5M and Enterprise required above $5M
- Advertising packages are a separate add-on starting at $499 per month on top of the software subscription
- No monthly subscription price for any tier is shown on the pricing page
- Takeoffs, scheduling, selections boards, daily logs, budgets, bid management, change orders and financial reporting are not in the free basic plan
Sitemark
- It only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- Pricing is quoted on site count and unpublished variables, which penalises owners of many small distributed assets relative to one operator of a single large plant with the same total capacity.
- You still need someone to fly the site, and Sitemark does not remove the drone operator cost, permits or airspace constraints; it monetises the data after the flight.
- Automated progress counting depends on a clean, current design layout, and on projects where the layout changes weekly the comparison generates false deviations that erode trust in the numbers.
- Thermographic defect detection needs the plant producing at sufficient irradiance, so inspection windows in northern latitudes are narrow and a missed window pushes findings into the next season.
Pricing, plan by plan
Houzz Pro
Free- FreeFree
- Portfolio showcase
- Lead generation
- Basic profile
- Plus$39/month
- Advanced portfolio
- Lead management
- Client communication
Sitemark
On request- Sitemark Construction$undefined/year
- Priced on number of sites and other variables
- Progress tracking across construction activities
- As-built versus design quality control
- Sitemark Operations$undefined/year
- Thermographic inspection and defect detection
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose Houzz Pro if
- You need project management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want client communication.
Choose Sitemark if
- You need construction progress tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want as-built versus design comparison.
Questions people ask
- Is Houzz Pro or Sitemark better?
- Neither clearly leads. Houzz Pro starts at Free and Sitemark at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Houzz Pro or Sitemark?
- Houzz Pro has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Houzz Pro and On request for Sitemark.
- Does Houzz Pro or Sitemark run on more platforms?
- Houzz Pro runs on Web, Ios, Android. Sitemark runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Houzz Pro for free?
- Yes. Houzz Pro has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sitemark starts at On request.
- What is Houzz Pro best used for?
- Houzz Pro is most often used for generating remodeling and design leads from a houzz professional profile, producing estimates, proposals and change orders for residential design and build projects, running client-facing selection boards and 3d floor plans for interior designers. Of those, generating remodeling and design leads from a houzz professional profile and producing estimates, proposals and change orders for residential design and build projects are not what Sitemark is typically brought in for.
- What can Houzz Pro do that Sitemark cannot?
- Houzz Pro covers Project management, Client communication, Portfolio management, Lead management. Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking, As-built versus design comparison, Thermographic inspection, Defect localisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Houzz Pro: How much do additional Houzz Pro users cost?
Additional user seats on the Houzz Pro plan cost $60 per user per month.
SourceSitemark: Is Sitemark priced per megawatt?
No. Sitemark states pricing is based on number of sites and other variables. Ask explicitly how a portfolio of small sites is treated, because per-site pricing is unkind to distributed assets.
Houzz Pro: What is the cost of Houzz Pro's advertising package?
Houzz Pro offers an add-on advertising package starting at $499 per month.
SourceSitemark: Do we have to use Sitemark drone pilots?
No. It accepts data from third-party drone operators, which lets you keep an existing flight contractor.
Houzz Pro: Is there a free trial for Houzz Pro?
Houzz Pro offers a 30-day free trial with no credit card required and includes a free basic plan with 3D Floor Planner, Estimates, and Invoicing.
SourceSitemark: Does it cover anything other than solar?
No. It is built specifically around solar plant structures and defect types.
Sitemark: Can we export our data?
Yes, orthomosaics, defect lists and reports export. Confirm the format and whether historical inspections remain accessible after a subscription lapses.
Sitemark: Where is the company based?
Leuven, Belgium, with customers across Europe, the Middle East, Asia and the Americas.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Houzz Pro vs Procore
- Houzz Pro vs Autodesk Revit
- Houzz Pro vs SketchUp
- Houzz Pro vs ArchiCAD
- Houzz Pro vs Buildertrend
- Houzz Pro vs CoConstruct
- Houzz Pro vs Kahua
- Houzz Pro vs Microsoft Project
- Houzz Pro vs Smartsheet Construction
- Houzz Pro vs ConstructConnect
- Houzz Pro vs Cubit Estimating
- Houzz Pro vs Dalux
- Houzz Pro vs e-Builder
- Houzz Pro vs InEight
- Houzz Pro vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Houzz Pro vs Trimble
- Houzz Pro vs Smartsheet
- Houzz Pro vs BuildingConnected
- Houzz Pro vs Reconstruct
- Houzz Pro vs Buildots
- Houzz Pro vs Propeller Aero
- Houzz Pro vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Houzz Pro vs B2W Estimate
- Houzz Pro vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Houzz Pro vs Primavera P6
- Houzz Pro vs Vectorworks Architect
- Houzz Pro vs Adaptive
- Houzz Pro vs Document Crunch
- Houzz Pro vs GCPay
- Houzz Pro vs HammerTech
- Houzz Pro vs Handoff
- Sitemark vs Procore
- Sitemark vs Autodesk Revit
- Sitemark vs SketchUp
- Sitemark vs ArchiCAD
- Sitemark vs Buildertrend
- Sitemark vs CoConstruct
- Sitemark vs Kahua
- Sitemark vs Microsoft Project
- Sitemark vs Smartsheet Construction
- Sitemark vs ConstructConnect
- Sitemark vs Cubit Estimating
- Sitemark vs Dalux
- Sitemark vs e-Builder
- Sitemark vs InEight
- Sitemark vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Sitemark vs Trimble
- Sitemark vs Smartsheet
- Sitemark vs BuildingConnected
- Sitemark vs Reconstruct
- Sitemark vs Buildots
- Sitemark vs Propeller Aero
- Sitemark vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Sitemark vs B2W Estimate
- Sitemark vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Sitemark vs Primavera P6
- Sitemark vs Vectorworks Architect
- Sitemark vs Adaptive
- Sitemark vs Document Crunch
- Sitemark vs GCPay
- Sitemark vs HammerTech
- Sitemark vs Handoff
