Construction · head to head
Assignar vs Clearstory

Assignar
Construction
Crew, equipment and compliance dispatch for self-perform and speciality contractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Clearstory
Construction
Digital change order and time and materials tag exchange between subcontractors and general contractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Assignar it is built for contractors who own crews and plant, so a general contractor coordinating subcontractors gets little from it beyond its own self-perform scopes.; Clearstory value depends on the counterparty using it, so a subcontractor whose general contractors have not adopted it ends up running the digital process and the emailed one at the same time.
- They diverge on capability: Assignar covers Crew and equipment scheduling, Clearstory covers Digital time and materials tags.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Assignar and Clearstory actually diverge.
| Attribute | Assignar | Clearstory |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Assignar
- Crew and equipment scheduling
- Digital dockets and timesheets
- Compliance and competency tracking
- Forms and inspections
- Offline mobile capture
- Production and cost reporting
Only in Clearstory
- Digital time and materials tags
- Review and signature routing
- Change order log
- Cost exposure reporting
- Field mobile capture
- Document export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Assignar
- A civil contractor scheduling crews and plant across multiple sites from one dispatch boardnot Clearstory
- A concrete or earthworks subcontractor replacing paper dockets that arrive three days latenot Clearstory
- A contractor that must prove operator competency and induction status on regulated sitesnot Clearstory
- A self-perform contractor comparing actual crew hours against estimated production ratesnot Clearstory
Clearstory
- A speciality subcontractor that regularly performs extra work and struggles to get tags signednot Assignar
- A general contractor tired of receiving a stack of disputed tags at project closeoutnot Assignar
- A project team that needs the value of pending extras visible during the job rather than after itnot Assignar
- A contractor standardising change documentation across trades on a large projectnot Assignar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Assignar
- It is built for contractors who own crews and plant, so a general contractor coordinating subcontractors gets little from it beyond its own self-perform scopes.
- It is not an accounting or payroll system, so the value depends on a clean integration to your finance system and on someone owning the reconciliation when hours disagree.
- Australian origins show in terminology and compliance defaults, and North American users spend setup time translating concepts such as tickets and inductions into local equivalents.
- Offline capture works, but photo-heavy forms on poor connections remain the weak point and should be tested on your worst site before a full rollout.
- Supervisors have to maintain the schedule for the reporting to mean anything, and dispatchers used to a whiteboard resist that for months unless the change is enforced.
Clearstory
- Value depends on the counterparty using it, so a subcontractor whose general contractors have not adopted it ends up running the digital process and the emailed one at the same time.
- It documents extra work but does not settle it; a general contractor determined not to pay is not persuaded by better paperwork, only better positioned to be argued with.
- Field staff have to complete tags properly for the record to hold up, and the discipline required is the same discipline that was failing on paper.
- Poor connectivity in basements, plant rooms and lift shafts is exactly where extra work gets documented, so offline reliability needs testing before rollout rather than after.
- It overlaps with change management already present in Procore and similar platforms, so buyers must be clear about which system holds the authoritative log or they will maintain two.
Pricing, plan by plan
Assignar
On request- Assignar$undefined/year
- Crew and equipment scheduling
- Digital dockets and timesheets
- Compliance tracking
Clearstory
On request- Clearstory$undefined/year
- Digital time and materials tags
- Change order log
- Mobile field capture
Which should you pick?
Choose Assignar if
- You need crew and equipment scheduling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want digital dockets and timesheets.
Choose Clearstory if
- You need digital time and materials tags.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want review and signature routing.
Questions people ask
- Is Assignar or Clearstory better?
- Neither clearly leads. Assignar starts at On request and Clearstory at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Assignar or Clearstory?
- Assignar starts at On request and Clearstory at On request.
- Does Assignar or Clearstory run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Assignar best used for?
- Assignar is most often used for a civil contractor scheduling crews and plant across multiple sites from one dispatch board, a concrete or earthworks subcontractor replacing paper dockets that arrive three days late, a contractor that must prove operator competency and induction status on regulated sites, a self-perform contractor comparing actual crew hours against estimated production rates. Of those, a civil contractor scheduling crews and plant across multiple sites from one dispatch board and a concrete or earthworks subcontractor replacing paper dockets that arrive three days late are not what Clearstory is typically brought in for.
- What can Assignar do that Clearstory cannot?
- Assignar covers Crew and equipment scheduling, Digital dockets and timesheets, Compliance and competency tracking, Forms and inspections. Clearstory covers Digital time and materials tags, Review and signature routing, Change order log, Cost exposure reporting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Assignar: Is this for general contractors or subcontractors?
Speciality and self-perform contractors. The unit of work is a crew and a machine on a shift, which is not how a general contractor coordinates trades.
Clearstory: Is Clearstory for subcontractors or general contractors?
Both, because the workflow crosses between them. The subcontractor originates the tag, the general contractor reviews it, and adoption works best when the general contractor mandates it.
Assignar: Does the mobile app work without signal?
Yes, entries are captured offline and synchronised later. Test it with photos attached on your worst site, because that is where sync problems appear.
Clearstory: Does it replace change management in Procore?
It can, for time and materials tags and the change order log, but you must decide which system is authoritative. Running both without that decision creates reconciliation work.
Assignar: Does it handle payroll?
No. It captures hours and quantities and passes them to your payroll or enterprise resource planning system.
Clearstory: What happens on sites without signal?
Tags are captured on the device and synchronised later. Test that path with photographs attached before relying on it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Assignar vs HCSS
- Assignar vs Raken
- Assignar vs Procore
- Assignar vs GCPay
- Assignar vs Topcon MAGNET
- Assignar vs Kojo
- Assignar vs Siteline
- Assignar vs HammerTech
- Assignar vs ConstructConnect
- Assignar vs CMiC
- Assignar vs Document Crunch
- Assignar vs JobTread
- Assignar vs Jonas Premier
- Assignar vs Kahua
- Assignar vs Navisworks
- Assignar vs Newforma
- Assignar vs eSUB
- Assignar vs Bridgit Bravo
- Assignar vs Reconstruct
- Assignar vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Assignar vs Adaptive
- Assignar vs ALICE Technologies
- Assignar vs B2W Estimate
- Assignar vs Billd
- Clearstory vs HCSS
- Clearstory vs Raken
- Clearstory vs Procore
- Clearstory vs GCPay
- Clearstory vs Topcon MAGNET
- Clearstory vs Kojo
- Clearstory vs Siteline
- Clearstory vs HammerTech
- Clearstory vs ConstructConnect
- Clearstory vs CMiC
- Clearstory vs Document Crunch
- Clearstory vs JobTread
- Clearstory vs Jonas Premier
- Clearstory vs Kahua
- Clearstory vs Navisworks
- Clearstory vs Newforma
- Clearstory vs eSUB
- Clearstory vs Bridgit Bravo
- Clearstory vs Reconstruct
- Clearstory vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Clearstory vs Adaptive
- Clearstory vs ALICE Technologies
- Clearstory vs B2W Estimate
- Clearstory vs Billd
