Government · head to head
Clariti vs ThetaRay

Clariti
Government
Permitting, licensing and land management for local government, built natively on Salesforce
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

ThetaRay
Cybersecurity
Unsupervised AI transaction monitoring for cross-border and correspondent banking
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clariti salesforce platform licences sit underneath the subscription and are not always visible in the initial quote, so the fully loaded cost can be materially higher than the comparison against Accela or Tyler suggests.; ThetaRay unsupervised models are harder to justify to an examiner than explicit rules, and some regulators still expect documented threshold logic, which can force you to run both systems.
- They diverge on capability: Clariti covers Permitting workflows, ThetaRay covers Unsupervised detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clariti and ThetaRay actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clariti
- Permitting workflows
- Business licensing
- Inspections
- Code enforcement
- Public portal
- Salesforce platform tooling
Only in ThetaRay
- Unsupervised detection
- Cross-border focus
- Sanctions screening
- Alert triage
- Customer risk scoring
- Cloud native
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clariti
- A city already standardised on Salesforce that wants permitting inside the same platformnot ThetaRay
- An agency replacing a legacy permitting system whose vendor was acquired and whose roadmap stallednot ThetaRay
- A county needing configurable workflows across permits, licensing and code enforcementnot ThetaRay
- An IT department that wants to configure and report on its own permitting workflows without vendor ticketsnot ThetaRay
ThetaRay
- A correspondent bank that cannot see the ultimate originator and needs behavioural signals rather than counterparty listsnot Clariti
- A cross-border payments fintech whose rules engine produces more alerts than its compliance team can clearnot Clariti
- A bank under a regulatory consent order needing demonstrable improvement in detection within a fixed periodnot Clariti
- A payment institution entering a high-risk corridor where existing thresholds were calibrated on domestic trafficnot Clariti
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clariti
- Salesforce platform licences sit underneath the subscription and are not always visible in the initial quote, so the fully loaded cost can be materially higher than the comparison against Accela or Tyler suggests.
- Building on Salesforce means the agency inherits Salesforce release cycles and pricing changes, neither of which Clariti controls.
- It has far less accumulated edge case handling than the incumbents, so unusual fee schedules, historic district rules or state mandated reporting can become configuration projects.
- Professional services dominate the first year cost, as with every permitting implementation, and agencies that budget only for licence are the ones whose projects stall.
- The install base is smaller than Accela or Tyler, so there are fewer peer agencies to call for reference and fewer trained implementation consultants in the market.
ThetaRay
- Unsupervised models are harder to justify to an examiner than explicit rules, and some regulators still expect documented threshold logic, which can force you to run both systems.
- The alert reduction claim depends heavily on your data, so a parallel run is essential and adds months and cost before you can decommission the incumbent.
- Coverage is strongest in cross-border and correspondent flows; institutions whose risk is domestic retail fraud will find the fit weaker than a general-purpose monitoring platform.
- It is a smaller vendor than the incumbents, so integration connectors into legacy core banking systems are often bespoke work rather than a supported adapter.
- Model retraining and tuning are vendor-led, which means changing detection behaviour is a support conversation rather than something your own analysts can do that afternoon.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clariti
On request- Clariti$undefined/year
- Quoted by agency size and module scope
- Salesforce platform licences are a separate cost underneath the subscription
- Implementation and configuration services typically exceed first year licence cost
ThetaRay
On request- ThetaRay Sonar$undefined/year
- Priced by monitored transaction volume and number of monitored entities
- SaaS on Azure with regional data residency options
- Parallel run and model tuning included in onboarding
Which should you pick?
Choose Clariti if
- You need permitting workflows.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want business licensing.
Questions people ask
- Is Clariti or ThetaRay better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clariti starts at On request and ThetaRay at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clariti or ThetaRay?
- Clariti starts at On request and ThetaRay at On request.
- Does Clariti or ThetaRay run on more platforms?
- Clariti runs on Web, iOS, Android. ThetaRay runs on Web.
- What is Clariti best used for?
- Clariti is most often used for a city already standardised on salesforce that wants permitting inside the same platform, an agency replacing a legacy permitting system whose vendor was acquired and whose roadmap stalled, a county needing configurable workflows across permits, licensing and code enforcement, an it department that wants to configure and report on its own permitting workflows without vendor tickets. Of those, a city already standardised on salesforce that wants permitting inside the same platform and an agency replacing a legacy permitting system whose vendor was acquired and whose roadmap stalled are not what ThetaRay is typically brought in for.
- What can Clariti do that ThetaRay cannot?
- Clariti covers Permitting workflows, Business licensing, Inspections, Code enforcement. ThetaRay covers Unsupervised detection, Cross-border focus, Sanctions screening, Alert triage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clariti: Do we need Salesforce licences as well?
Yes. Clariti runs on the Salesforce platform, and those licences are a separate line item. Insist on a fully loaded quote.
ThetaRay: Does it replace a rules engine entirely?
Rarely on day one. Most institutions run it alongside existing rules during a parallel period, and some keep specific regulator-mandated rules permanently.
Clariti: How does it compare with Accela?
Accela has far deeper accumulated handling of edge cases. Clariti offers a more modern and configurable platform, at the price of Salesforce underneath.
ThetaRay: Where is the data processed?
SaaS runs on Microsoft Azure with regional deployment options, which is the mechanism for meeting data residency conditions in regulated markets.
Clariti: Can we see what other agencies paid?
Yes. Permitting contracts are public records and award notices routinely list implementation and annual subscription values.
ThetaRay: Is sanctions screening included?
Screening is available on the same platform but licensed as part of the commercial package rather than bundled by default. Confirm it is in your quote.
Clariti: Is it suitable for a small town?
Usually not. The platform cost and implementation effort suit mid sized and larger agencies.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clariti vs Accela
- Clariti vs CityView
- Clariti vs Tyler Technologies
- Clariti vs GovPilot
- Clariti vs mySidewalk
- Clariti vs NEOGOV
- Clariti vs ArchiveSocial
- Clariti vs Bonfire
- Clariti vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Clariti vs Periscope Holdings
- Clariti vs Zencity
- Clariti vs OpenGov
- Clariti vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Clariti vs NextRequest
- Clariti vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Clariti vs VUEWorks
- Clariti vs American Legal Publishing
- Clariti vs Feedzai
- Clariti vs Unit21
- Clariti vs Quantexa
- Clariti vs Silent Eight
- Clariti vs NICE Actimize
- Clariti vs Sardine
- Clariti vs Fenergo
- Clariti vs Jumio
- Clariti vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Clariti vs Sumsub
- Clariti vs iDenfy
- Clariti vs Shufti Pro
- Clariti vs VMware Carbon Black
- Clariti vs Wireshark
- Clariti vs WorkOS
- Clariti vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Clariti vs Milestone XProtect
- Clariti vs Osano
- ThetaRay vs Accela
- ThetaRay vs CityView
- ThetaRay vs Tyler Technologies
- ThetaRay vs GovPilot
- ThetaRay vs mySidewalk
- ThetaRay vs NEOGOV
- ThetaRay vs ArchiveSocial
- ThetaRay vs Bonfire
- ThetaRay vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- ThetaRay vs Periscope Holdings
- ThetaRay vs Zencity
- ThetaRay vs OpenGov
- ThetaRay vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- ThetaRay vs NextRequest
- ThetaRay vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- ThetaRay vs VUEWorks
- ThetaRay vs American Legal Publishing
- ThetaRay vs Feedzai
- ThetaRay vs Unit21
- ThetaRay vs Quantexa
- ThetaRay vs Silent Eight
- ThetaRay vs NICE Actimize
- ThetaRay vs Sardine
- ThetaRay vs Fenergo
- ThetaRay vs Jumio
- ThetaRay vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- ThetaRay vs Sumsub
- ThetaRay vs iDenfy
- ThetaRay vs Shufti Pro
- ThetaRay vs VMware Carbon Black
- ThetaRay vs Wireshark
- ThetaRay vs WorkOS
- ThetaRay vs Zscaler Internet Access
- ThetaRay vs Milestone XProtect
- ThetaRay vs Osano
