Customer Support · head to head
Chatwoot vs Kong Gateway

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chatwoot free plan limited to 2 agents and 500 conversations per month; Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- They diverge on capability: Chatwoot covers Live chat, Kong Gateway covers API request routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chatwoot and Kong Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chatwoot | Kong Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, Self-hosted | web, linux, api |
| Category | Customer Support | APIs |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), founded (2017).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chatwoot
- Live chat
- Email inbox
- Social channels
- Knowledge base
- Chatbots
- Reports
- Slack
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chatwoot
- Self-hosted supportnot Kong Gateway
- Privacy-first chatnot Kong Gateway
- Multi-channel supportnot Kong Gateway
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Chatwoot
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Chatwoot
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Chatwoot
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Chatwoot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chatwoot
- Free plan limited to 2 agents and 500 conversations per month
- Self-hosted option requires managing infrastructure, updates, and external messaging costs
- Smaller ecosystem and community compared to Zendesk or Intercom
- AI features require credit consumption and additional configuration
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chatwoot
Free- HackerFree
- 2 agents
- 500 conversations per month
- 1 live chat channel
- Startups$19/month
- Unlimited agents
- Unlimited conversations
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Which should you pick?
Choose Chatwoot if
- You need live chat.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted.
- You also want email inbox.
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Questions people ask
- Is Chatwoot or Kong Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chatwoot starts at Free and Kong Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chatwoot or Kong Gateway?
- Chatwoot starts at Free and Kong Gateway at Free.
- Does Chatwoot or Kong Gateway run on more platforms?
- Chatwoot runs on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted. Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api.
- Can I use Chatwoot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chatwoot best used for?
- Chatwoot is most often used for self-hosted support, privacy-first chat, multi-channel support. Of those, self-hosted support and privacy-first chat are not what Kong Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can Chatwoot do that Kong Gateway cannot?
- Chatwoot covers Live chat, Email inbox, Social channels, Knowledge base. Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chatwoot: Does Chatwoot offer a self-hosted option?
Yes. Chatwoot provides both cloud-hosted and self-hosted versions. Self-hosting is free with the open-source version, though you handle infrastructure, maintenance, and external messaging costs.
SourceKong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceChatwoot: What communication channels does Chatwoot support?
Chatwoot supports email, live chat, WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and other social media channels consolidated into a single inbox.
SourceKong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceChatwoot: Is there a free plan for Chatwoot?
Yes. Chatwoot offers a free Hacker plan supporting up to 2 agents, 500 conversations per month, and one live chat channel.
SourceKong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceChatwoot: What AI features does Chatwoot include?
Chatwoot includes Captain AI agent for automated responses, Copilot for smart reply suggestions, and live translation features.
SourceRelated pages
More on Kong Gateway
Other head to heads
- Chatwoot vs Re:amaze
- Chatwoot vs Missive
- Chatwoot vs LiveAgent
- Chatwoot vs HelpCrunch
- Chatwoot vs Customerly
- Chatwoot vs Help Scout
- Chatwoot vs Freshdesk
- Chatwoot vs Groove
- Chatwoot vs Richpanel
- Chatwoot vs Sprinklr Service
- Chatwoot vs Dixa
- Chatwoot vs SupportBee
- Chatwoot vs RingCentral Contact Center
- Chatwoot vs UJET
- Chatwoot vs UserVoice
- Chatwoot vs Verint
- Chatwoot vs Tyk
- Chatwoot vs Moesif
- Chatwoot vs Treblle
- Chatwoot vs Convoy
- Chatwoot vs Janus Gateway
- Chatwoot vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Chatwoot vs Gravitee
- Chatwoot vs Strapi
- Chatwoot vs WSO2 API Manager
- Chatwoot vs AWS API Gateway
- Chatwoot vs GraphQL Apollo
- Chatwoot vs Appwrite
- Chatwoot vs Sensedia
- Chatwoot vs Sila
- Chatwoot vs Swagger
- Chatwoot vs TIBCO Mashery
- Chatwoot vs Zeplo
- Kong Gateway vs Re:amaze
- Kong Gateway vs Missive
- Kong Gateway vs LiveAgent
- Kong Gateway vs HelpCrunch
- Kong Gateway vs Customerly
- Kong Gateway vs Help Scout
- Kong Gateway vs Freshdesk
- Kong Gateway vs Groove
- Kong Gateway vs Richpanel
- Kong Gateway vs Sprinklr Service
- Kong Gateway vs Dixa
- Kong Gateway vs SupportBee
- Kong Gateway vs RingCentral Contact Center
- Kong Gateway vs UJET
- Kong Gateway vs UserVoice
- Kong Gateway vs Verint
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Sensedia
- Kong Gateway vs Sila
- Kong Gateway vs Swagger
- Kong Gateway vs TIBCO Mashery
- Kong Gateway vs Zeplo

