APIs · head to head
Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Spring Cloud Gateway
APIs
API gateway built on Project Reactor for building microservices
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.; Spring Cloud Gateway released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong Gateway and Spring Cloud Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong Gateway | Spring Cloud Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Platforms | web, linux, api | Java, Spring Boot |
| Founded | 2017 | 1998 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
Only in Spring Cloud Gateway
- Routing
- Path Rewriting
- Circuit Breaker
- Spring Boot
- Spring Security
- Spring Cloud
- Java support
- Spring Boot support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Spring Cloud Gateway
Spring Cloud Gateway
- API Developmentnot Kong Gateway
- API Gatewaynot Kong Gateway
- API Testingnot Kong Gateway
- API Documentationnot Kong Gateway
- Microservicesnot Kong Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Spring Cloud Gateway
- Released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Spring Cloud Gateway
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core Spring Cloud Gateway
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Choose Spring Cloud Gateway if
- You need routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Java, Spring Boot.
- You also want path rewriting.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong Gateway or Spring Cloud Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong Gateway starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong Gateway or Spring Cloud Gateway?
- Kong Gateway starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free.
- Does Kong Gateway or Spring Cloud Gateway run on more platforms?
- Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api. Spring Cloud Gateway runs on Java, Spring Boot.
- Can I use Kong Gateway for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong Gateway best used for?
- Kong Gateway is most often used for routing and securing traffic across microservices, publishing internal or external developer portals, managing rate limits and authentication at the api edge, gateway-level routing to multiple llm providers. Of those, routing and securing traffic across microservices and publishing internal or external developer portals are not what Spring Cloud Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong Gateway do that Spring Cloud Gateway cannot?
- Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway. Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing, Path Rewriting, Circuit Breaker, Spring Boot.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceSpring Cloud Gateway: Is Spring Cloud Gateway free?
Yes, Spring Cloud Gateway is free and open-source software. It is part of the Spring ecosystem and available through GitHub repositories with open-source dependencies like spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webflux and spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webmvc.
SourceKong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceSpring Cloud Gateway: What enterprise support is available for Spring Cloud Gateway?
Tanzu Spring provides optional enterprise support including Day 0 access to security patches for organizations requiring guaranteed support, but specific pricing is not published on the Spring Cloud Gateway project page.
SourceKong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceRelated pages
More on Kong Gateway
More on Spring Cloud Gateway
Other head to heads
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Payload CMS
- Kong Gateway vs Portkey
- Kong Gateway vs Prisma
- Kong Gateway vs RapidAPI
- Kong Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Kong Gateway vs Rutter
- Kong Gateway vs Hasura
- Kong Gateway vs PocketBase
- Kong Gateway vs Sanity
- Kong Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- Kong Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Kong Gateway vs Thredd
- Kong Gateway vs Thunder Client
- Kong Gateway vs Toqio
- Kong Gateway vs Kong
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Tyk
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Moesif
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Treblle
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Convoy
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Gravitee
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Strapi
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Appwrite
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Payload CMS
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Portkey
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Prisma
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs RapidAPI
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Rutter
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Hasura
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs PocketBase
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Sanity
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thredd
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thunder Client
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Toqio
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong
