Construction · head to head
Buildots vs Fieldwire

Buildots
Construction
Hard hat mounted 360 cameras and computer vision that score build progress against the BIM model
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Fieldwire
Construction
Field management software for construction teams
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Fieldwire has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Buildots tracking depends on a BIM model maintained at construction level of detail; on a job where the model is stale or was never built for coordination, the comparison degrades and much of the value disappears.; Fieldwire free tier limited to 5 team members and 3 projects maximum
- They diverge on capability: Buildots covers Hard hat 360 capture, Fieldwire covers Task management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Buildots and Fieldwire actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Buildots
- Hard hat 360 capture
- Model to as-built comparison
- Per activity progress scoring
- Programme deviation alerts
- Delay forecasting
- Visual evidence trail
- Subcontractor performance reporting
Only in Fieldwire
- Task management
- Digital blueprints
- Punch lists
- Inspections
- Photo documentation
- Procore
- Autodesk BIM 360
- Box
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Buildots
- A residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle timenot Fieldwire
- A hospital or data centre fit-out where MEP first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every monthnot Fieldwire
- A developer that wants independent progress evidence before certifying an interim payment applicationnot Fieldwire
- A contractor building a production rate history across projects so future programmes are based on measured output rather than assumptionnot Fieldwire
Fieldwire
- Construction task tracking and field coordinationnot Buildots
- Punch list management on mobile devicesnot Buildots
- Project documentation organisationnot Buildots
- Field team communicationnot Buildots
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Buildots
- Tracking depends on a BIM model maintained at construction level of detail; on a job where the model is stale or was never built for coordination, the comparison degrades and much of the value disappears.
- The data only arrives if someone walks the site every week with the camera, so coverage decays quietly when the site team is under pressure, exactly when the reporting is most needed.
- Pricing is per project rather than per seat and includes hardware, so a contractor cannot roll it out cheaply across a portfolio of small jobs and it is uneconomic below a certain project value.
- It reads interior fit-out and repetitive vertical work far better than structure, groundworks or external envelope, so a large fraction of a project's programme is outside what it can score.
- Making progress objective creates commercial friction with subcontractors whose valuations have historically been negotiated, and contractors who deploy it without addressing that in the subcontract get pushback rather than adoption.
Fieldwire
- Free tier limited to 5 team members and 3 projects maximum
- Basic plan limited to 100 sheets
- Advanced features (RFIs, submittals, change orders, budget management) restricted to higher tiers
- BIM viewer availability gated to Business tier and above
Pricing, plan by plan
Buildots
On request- Buildots$undefined/year
- Priced per project by size and duration
- Camera hardware included in the engagement
- Model onboarding and setup quoted separately
Fieldwire
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fieldwire review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Buildots if
- You need hard hat 360 capture.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want model to as-built comparison.
Choose Fieldwire if
- You need task management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android.
- You also want digital blueprints.
Questions people ask
- Is Buildots or Fieldwire better?
- Neither clearly leads. Buildots starts at On request and Fieldwire at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Buildots or Fieldwire?
- Fieldwire has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Buildots and Free for Fieldwire.
- Does Buildots or Fieldwire run on more platforms?
- Buildots runs on Web, iOS, Android. Fieldwire runs on iOS, Android.
- Can I use Fieldwire for free?
- Yes. Fieldwire has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Buildots starts at On request.
- What is Buildots best used for?
- Buildots is most often used for a residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle time, a hospital or data centre fit-out where mep first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every month, a developer that wants independent progress evidence before certifying an interim payment application, a contractor building a production rate history across projects so future programmes are based on measured output rather than assumption. Of those, a residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle time and a hospital or data centre fit-out where mep first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every month are not what Fieldwire is typically brought in for.
- What can Buildots do that Fieldwire cannot?
- Buildots covers Hard hat 360 capture, Model to as-built comparison, Per activity progress scoring, Programme deviation alerts. Fieldwire covers Task management, Digital blueprints, Punch lists, Inspections.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Buildots: What does Buildots cost?
It is quoted per project based on size, duration and scope, with camera hardware included. Nothing is published.
Fieldwire: Is there a free version of Fieldwire?
Yes. Fieldwire's Basic plan is free for up to 5 users, 3 projects, and 100 sheets. It includes core features like plan viewing, task management, specifications, files, photos, and checklists.
SourceBuildots: Do I need a BIM model?
Yes. The system scores progress by comparing captured conditions against model objects, so the model quality sets the ceiling on accuracy.
Fieldwire: What are the per-user costs for paid Fieldwire plans?
Pro costs $39 per user per month (annual billing), Business costs $64 per user per month, and Business Plus costs $89 per user per month. All paid plans include unlimited sheets and unlimited projects regardless of plan tier.
SourceBuildots: What kind of projects suit it?
Repetitive vertical work with heavy interior fit-out. Civil, groundworks and external envelope are poorly covered.
Fieldwire: How many users can I have on a free Fieldwire account?
The Basic plan (free) supports up to 5 users with 3 projects. Pro and higher plans scale without hard user limits; you pay per user added.
SourceBuildots: Who does the site walks?
Your own site team, typically once or twice a week. There is no Buildots operator on site.
Fieldwire: Does Fieldwire offer discounts for annual billing?
The pricing page lists annual billing rates for the standard plans shown. Custom contracts are available through sales with options for unlimited users, tailored training, dedicated success teams, API access, and single sign-on.
SourceFieldwire: What is included in the Business Plus plan that isn't in lower tiers?
Business Plus ($89/user/month) adds RFIs, submittals, change orders, and budget management features compared to the Business tier. Business itself adds custom forms, app integrations, BIM viewer, and custom task fields compared to Pro.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Buildots vs Openspace
- Buildots vs Procore
- Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Buildots vs Dalux
- Buildots vs RIB CostX
- Buildots vs Autodesk Revit
- Buildots vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Buildots vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Buildots vs Togal.AI
- Buildots vs BricsCAD BIM
- Buildots vs Cubit Estimating
- Buildots vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Buildots vs Viewpoint Vista
- Buildots vs Briq
- Buildots vs Buildertrend
- Buildots vs ConstructConnect
- Buildots vs BuildingConnected
- Buildots vs SketchUp
- Buildots vs ArchiCAD
- Buildots vs Raken
- Buildots vs eSUB
- Buildots vs Smartsheet Construction
- Buildots vs PlanSwift
- Buildots vs Microsoft Project
- Buildots vs ALICE Technologies
- Buildots vs Assignar
- Buildots vs Billd
- Buildots vs Bridgit Bravo
- Buildots vs Builderbox
- Buildots vs PlanGrid
- Buildots vs B2W Estimate
- Buildots vs Smartsheet
- Fieldwire vs Openspace
- Fieldwire vs Procore
- Fieldwire vs Reconstruct
- Fieldwire vs Dalux
- Fieldwire vs RIB CostX
- Fieldwire vs Autodesk Revit
- Fieldwire vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Fieldwire vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Fieldwire vs Togal.AI
- Fieldwire vs BricsCAD BIM
- Fieldwire vs Cubit Estimating
- Fieldwire vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Fieldwire vs Viewpoint Vista
- Fieldwire vs Briq
- Fieldwire vs Buildertrend
- Fieldwire vs ConstructConnect
- Fieldwire vs BuildingConnected
- Fieldwire vs SketchUp
- Fieldwire vs ArchiCAD
- Fieldwire vs Raken
- Fieldwire vs eSUB
- Fieldwire vs Smartsheet Construction
- Fieldwire vs PlanSwift
- Fieldwire vs Microsoft Project
- Fieldwire vs ALICE Technologies
- Fieldwire vs Assignar
- Fieldwire vs Billd
- Fieldwire vs Bridgit Bravo
- Fieldwire vs Builderbox
- Fieldwire vs PlanGrid
- Fieldwire vs B2W Estimate
- Fieldwire vs Smartsheet
