Construction · head to head
Buildots vs Togal.AI

Buildots
Construction
Hard hat mounted 360 cameras and computer vision that score build progress against the BIM model
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Togal.AI
Construction
Automated drawing takeoff that measures and labels spaces without manual tracing
- From
- $299/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Buildots tracking depends on a BIM model maintained at construction level of detail; on a job where the model is stale or was never built for coordination, the comparison degrades and much of the value disappears.; Togal.AI annual billing is mandatory at $299 per user per month, so an estimating team that ramps up and down for bid seasons pays a full year for seats it uses intermittently.
- They diverge on capability: Buildots covers Hard hat 360 capture, Togal.AI covers Automatic space detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Buildots and Togal.AI actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Buildots
- Hard hat 360 capture
- Model to as-built comparison
- Per activity progress scoring
- Programme deviation alerts
- Delay forecasting
- Visual evidence trail
- Subcontractor performance reporting
Only in Togal.AI
- Automatic space detection
- Drawing comparison
- Natural language search
- Automated counts
- Excel export
- Plan set management
- Team sharing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Buildots
- A residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle timenot Togal.AI
- A hospital or data centre fit-out where MEP first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every monthnot Togal.AI
- A developer that wants independent progress evidence before certifying an interim payment applicationnot Togal.AI
- A contractor building a production rate history across projects so future programmes are based on measured output rather than assumptionnot Togal.AI
Togal.AI
- A commercial general contractor bidding repetitive multifamily or hospitality floor plates where room-by-room area takeoff dominates the effortnot Buildots
- An estimating team that needs to requantify quickly when an architect issues a revised set two days before a bidnot Buildots
- A finishes subcontractor pricing flooring, paint and ceiling areas across hundreds of roomsnot Buildots
- A preconstruction group producing early order-of-magnitude budgets from schematic plans before a full estimate is justifiednot Buildots
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Buildots
- Tracking depends on a BIM model maintained at construction level of detail; on a job where the model is stale or was never built for coordination, the comparison degrades and much of the value disappears.
- The data only arrives if someone walks the site every week with the camera, so coverage decays quietly when the site team is under pressure, exactly when the reporting is most needed.
- Pricing is per project rather than per seat and includes hardware, so a contractor cannot roll it out cheaply across a portfolio of small jobs and it is uneconomic below a certain project value.
- It reads interior fit-out and repetitive vertical work far better than structure, groundworks or external envelope, so a large fraction of a project's programme is outside what it can score.
- Making progress objective creates commercial friction with subcontractors whose valuations have historically been negotiated, and contractors who deploy it without addressing that in the subcontract get pushback rather than adoption.
Togal.AI
- Annual billing is mandatory at $299 per user per month, so an estimating team that ramps up and down for bid seasons pays a full year for seats it uses intermittently.
- Detection is tuned to architectural floor plans and space-based quantities; civil, structural detail and MEP riser takeoff still need a conventional tool, so most firms end up paying for two.
- Automatically generated quantities still require estimator review before they enter a bid, so the saving is in tracing time rather than in checking time, and firms that skip the check are exposed on a hard-money bid.
- The company spun out of a single general contractor, and drawing conventions that differ from that firm's typical project types produce weaker detection until the set is cleaned up.
- It is a takeoff tool, not an estimating system, so pricing, rate build-up and bid assembly still happen elsewhere and the Excel handoff is the seam where errors get introduced.
Pricing, plan by plan
Buildots
On request- Buildots$undefined/year
- Priced per project by size and duration
- Camera hardware included in the engagement
- Model onboarding and setup quoted separately
Togal.AI
$299/month- Growth$299/month
- One or two licences
- Unlimited AI takeoffs
- Drawing comparison and search
- Business$undefined/year
- Three or more licences
- Quoted by the vendor
- Team administration and shared takeoffs
Which should you pick?
Choose Buildots if
- You need hard hat 360 capture.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want model to as-built comparison.
Choose Togal.AI if
- You need automatic space detection.
- You also want drawing comparison.
Questions people ask
- Is Buildots or Togal.AI better?
- Neither clearly leads. Buildots starts at On request and Togal.AI at $299/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Buildots or Togal.AI?
- Buildots starts at On request and Togal.AI at $299/month.
- Does Buildots or Togal.AI run on more platforms?
- Buildots runs on Web, iOS, Android. Togal.AI runs on Web.
- What is Buildots best used for?
- Buildots is most often used for a residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle time, a hospital or data centre fit-out where mep first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every month, a developer that wants independent progress evidence before certifying an interim payment application, a contractor building a production rate history across projects so future programmes are based on measured output rather than assumption. Of those, a residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle time and a hospital or data centre fit-out where mep first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every month are not what Togal.AI is typically brought in for.
- What can Buildots do that Togal.AI cannot?
- Buildots covers Hard hat 360 capture, Model to as-built comparison, Per activity progress scoring, Programme deviation alerts. Togal.AI covers Automatic space detection, Drawing comparison, Natural language search, Automated counts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Buildots: What does Buildots cost?
It is quoted per project based on size, duration and scope, with camera hardware included. Nothing is published.
Togal.AI: What does Togal.AI cost?
$299 per user per month billed annually for one or two licences. Three or more users are quoted individually.
Buildots: Do I need a BIM model?
Yes. The system scores progress by comparing captured conditions against model objects, so the model quality sets the ceiling on accuracy.
Togal.AI: Can I pay monthly?
No. The published Growth plan requires annual billing.
Buildots: What kind of projects suit it?
Repetitive vertical work with heavy interior fit-out. Civil, groundworks and external envelope are poorly covered.
Togal.AI: Does it replace an estimating system?
No. It produces quantities. Rates, markup and bid assembly still happen in your estimating software or a spreadsheet.
Buildots: Who does the site walks?
Your own site team, typically once or twice a week. There is no Buildots operator on site.
Togal.AI: Who owns the drawings and takeoffs I upload?
You do, and quantities export to Excel, but check the contract for how uploaded drawing sets are retained and whether they inform model training.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Buildots vs Openspace
- Buildots vs Procore
- Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Buildots vs Dalux
- Buildots vs RIB CostX
- Buildots vs Autodesk Revit
- Buildots vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Buildots vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Buildots vs BricsCAD BIM
- Buildots vs Cubit Estimating
- Buildots vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Buildots vs Viewpoint Vista
- Buildots vs Briq
- Buildots vs Buildertrend
- Buildots vs ConstructConnect
- Buildots vs BuildingConnected
- Buildots vs PlanSwift
- Buildots vs Bluebeam Revu
- Buildots vs Handoff
- Buildots vs HCSS
- Buildots vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Buildots vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Buildots vs Trunk Tools
- Buildots vs Propeller Aero
- Buildots vs Siteline
- Buildots vs Sitemark
- Buildots vs Tekla Structures
- Togal.AI vs Openspace
- Togal.AI vs Procore
- Togal.AI vs Reconstruct
- Togal.AI vs Dalux
- Togal.AI vs RIB CostX
- Togal.AI vs Autodesk Revit
- Togal.AI vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Togal.AI vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Togal.AI vs BricsCAD BIM
- Togal.AI vs Cubit Estimating
- Togal.AI vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Togal.AI vs Viewpoint Vista
- Togal.AI vs Briq
- Togal.AI vs Buildertrend
- Togal.AI vs ConstructConnect
- Togal.AI vs BuildingConnected
- Togal.AI vs PlanSwift
- Togal.AI vs Bluebeam Revu
- Togal.AI vs Handoff
- Togal.AI vs HCSS
- Togal.AI vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Togal.AI vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Togal.AI vs Trunk Tools
- Togal.AI vs Propeller Aero
- Togal.AI vs Siteline
- Togal.AI vs Sitemark
- Togal.AI vs Tekla Structures
