Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Speakeasy

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Speakeasy
Cybersecurity
AI control plane for governing enterprise agents, MCP servers, and skills
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only authentik has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Speakeasy no self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Speakeasy actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Speakeasy
- AI tool catalog
- Per-agent identity
- Role-based access control
- Real-time policy enforcement
- Audit logging
- MDM and SSO integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Speakeasy
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Speakeasy
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Speakeasy
Speakeasy
- Governing AI agents at enterprise scalenot authentik
- Preventing shadow AI tool sprawlnot authentik
- Enforcing least-privilege access for agentsnot authentik
- Auditing AI tool call activity for compliancenot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Speakeasy
- No self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- The product pivoted away from its original SDK-generation offering, so past documentation and customers built on that use case are no longer the focus.
- Requires integration with an existing identity provider such as Okta or Entra ID to be useful, so it is not a standalone solution.
- No published free tier or trial pricing was found.
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Speakeasy
On request- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom pricing
- AI tool catalog and visibility
- Per-agent identity and access control
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Speakeasy if
- You need ai tool catalog.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want per-agent identity.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Speakeasy better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Speakeasy at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Speakeasy?
- authentik has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for authentik and On request for Speakeasy.
- Does authentik or Speakeasy run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Speakeasy runs on web, api.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Yes. authentik has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Speakeasy starts at On request.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Speakeasy is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Speakeasy cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog, Per-agent identity, Role-based access control, Real-time policy enforcement.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Speakeasy: How much does Speakeasy cost?
Speakeasy offers an Enterprise tier with features including SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. No specific pricing is published; interested parties contact the company to discuss pricing.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Speakeasy: What is included in Speakeasy's Enterprise plan?
The Enterprise plan includes SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. Customers contact Speakeasy to discuss their specific pricing for these features.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Doppler
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs Tenable
- authentik vs Endor Labs
- authentik vs Netwrix
- authentik vs Securiti
- authentik vs Qualys VMDR
- authentik vs Transcend
- authentik vs Omada Identity
- authentik vs Saviynt
- authentik vs Arnica
- authentik vs Trend Micro Vision One
- authentik vs TunnelBear
- authentik vs Vanta
- authentik vs Acunetix
- authentik vs Aikido
- Speakeasy vs Authelia
- Speakeasy vs Logto
- Speakeasy vs Ory
- Speakeasy vs Passbolt
- Speakeasy vs Clerk
- Speakeasy vs 1Password
- Speakeasy vs Frontegg
- Speakeasy vs OWASP ZAP
- Speakeasy vs Infisical
- Speakeasy vs Chainguard
- Speakeasy vs Bitwarden
- Speakeasy vs Cosign
- Speakeasy vs CyberGhost VPN
- Speakeasy vs Dahua Technology
- Speakeasy vs Descope
- Speakeasy vs Drata
- Speakeasy vs DTiQ
- Speakeasy vs Ory Kratos
- Speakeasy vs Doppler
- Speakeasy vs Akeyless
- Speakeasy vs Tenable
- Speakeasy vs Endor Labs
- Speakeasy vs Netwrix
- Speakeasy vs Securiti
- Speakeasy vs Qualys VMDR
- Speakeasy vs Transcend
- Speakeasy vs Omada Identity
- Speakeasy vs Saviynt
- Speakeasy vs Arnica
- Speakeasy vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Speakeasy vs TunnelBear
- Speakeasy vs Vanta
- Speakeasy vs Acunetix
- Speakeasy vs Aikido
