Cybersecurity · head to head
Arnica vs authentik

Arnica
Cybersecurity
AI-native application security platform detecting and fixing vulnerabilities across the SDLC
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Arnica per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers; authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- They diverge on capability: Arnica covers AI SAST, authentik covers Configurable flows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arnica and authentik actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arnica
- AI SAST
- Software Composition Analysis
- Secrets detection
- IaC scanning
- Container scanning
- SBOM generation
- Agentic rules
- Pipelineless integration
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arnica
- Detecting AI-generated vulnerabilities in Copilot and Cursor suggestionsnot authentik
- Finding hardcoded secrets before they reach productionnot authentik
- Mapping container vulnerabilities back to source codenot authentik
- Generating SBOM for supply chain compliance requirementsnot authentik
- Scanning infrastructure-as-code for misconfiguration risksnot authentik
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Arnica
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Arnica
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Arnica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arnica
- Per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- Overage identity tracking via 90-day PR activity can be unpredictable
- Free plan limited to weekly updates, requiring upgrade for real-time scanning
- Advanced add-ons (Image Scanning, AI SAST, Agentic Rules Enforcer) pricing not published
- On-premises deployment limited to Enterprise tier
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Pricing, plan by plan
Arnica
Free- FreeFree
- No credit card required
- 14-day trial available
- Weekly risk identification updates
- Core Business$360/year
- Monthly billing option at $30/identity/month
- Annual billing at $25/identity/month (17% discount)
- Real-time risk scanning and notifications
- Core Enterprise$720/year
- Monthly billing option at $60/identity/month
- Annual billing at $50/identity/month (17% discount)
- All Core Business features
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Arnica if
- You need ai sast.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis.
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Questions people ask
- Is Arnica or authentik better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arnica starts at Free and authentik at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arnica or authentik?
- Arnica starts at Free and authentik at Free.
- Does Arnica or authentik run on more platforms?
- Arnica runs on Web, GitHub, IDE. authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Arnica for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Arnica best used for?
- Arnica is most often used for detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions, finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production, mapping container vulnerabilities back to source code, generating sbom for supply chain compliance requirements. Of those, detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions and finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production are not what authentik is typically brought in for.
- What can Arnica do that authentik cannot?
- Arnica covers AI SAST, Software Composition Analysis, Secrets detection, IaC scanning. authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arnica: How are identities defined in Arnica pricing?
Identities are any users and other contributing entities that contributed code and/or had PR activity during the last 90 days. This ensures billing matches active developers.
Sourceauthentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Arnica: What is the annual discount?
Annual prepayment offers approximately 17% savings versus monthly billing. Core Business annual is $300/identity versus $360 for monthly.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Arnica: Can I cancel or downgrade Arnica anytime?
Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled or downgraded at any time. Overage identities receive automatic protection with true-up invoicing.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Arnica vs Semgrep
- Arnica vs Snyk
- Arnica vs Chainguard
- Arnica vs Tenable
- Arnica vs Doppler
- Arnica vs Aikido
- Arnica vs Endor Labs
- Arnica vs Trivy
- Arnica vs Socket
- Arnica vs Infisical
- Arnica vs Bitwarden
- Arnica vs RoboForm
- Arnica vs Sardine
- Arnica vs Semperis
- Arnica vs SentinelOne
- Arnica vs Shufti Pro
- Arnica vs Nessus
- Arnica vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Arnica vs Authelia
- Arnica vs Logto
- Arnica vs Ory
- Arnica vs Passbolt
- Arnica vs Clerk
- Arnica vs 1Password
- Arnica vs Frontegg
- Arnica vs OWASP ZAP
- Arnica vs Cosign
- Arnica vs CyberGhost VPN
- Arnica vs Dahua Technology
- Arnica vs Descope
- Arnica vs Drata
- Arnica vs DTiQ
- Arnica vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Semgrep
- authentik vs Snyk
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Tenable
- authentik vs Doppler
- authentik vs Aikido
- authentik vs Endor Labs
- authentik vs Trivy
- authentik vs Socket
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs RoboForm
- authentik vs Sardine
- authentik vs Semperis
- authentik vs SentinelOne
- authentik vs Shufti Pro
- authentik vs Nessus
- authentik vs SentinelOne Singularity
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
