Softwr

Cybersecurity · head to head

Acunetix vs authentik

Acunetix logo

Acunetix

Cybersecurity

Web application security testing made easy

From
On request
Rated
-
authentik logo

authentik

Cybersecurity

Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only authentik has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
  • They diverge on capability: Acunetix covers DAST scanning, authentik covers Configurable flows.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Acunetix and authentik actually diverge.

Attributes where Acunetix and authentik differ
AttributeAcunetixauthentik
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelsubscriptionOpen-source core with a paid enterprise tier
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsDesktop, Web, ApiDocker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted
Founded2005Unknown

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Acunetix

  • DAST scanning
  • IAST technology
  • AcuSensor
  • JavaScript security
  • SQL injection testing
  • XSS detection
  • OWASP Top 10
  • API security testing

Only in authentik

  • Configurable flows
  • Protocol support
  • Application proxy
  • Modern admin interface

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Acunetix

  • Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot authentik
  • Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot authentik
  • Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not authentik
  • Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot authentik

authentik

  • Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Acunetix
  • Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Acunetix
  • Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Acunetix

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Acunetix

  • Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
  • Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
  • Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
  • Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans

authentik

  • Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
  • The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
  • Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
  • Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available

Pricing, plan by plan

Acunetix

On request
  • StandardFree
    • Single user
    • 5 targets
    • Scheduled scans
  • PremiumFree
    • Multiple users
    • Unlimited targets
    • CI/CD integration
  • Acunetix 360Free
    • Enterprise features
    • SDLC integration
    • Custom workflows

authentik

Free
  • Open sourceFree
    • Full identity provider
    • All protocols
    • Community support

Which should you pick?

Choose Acunetix if

  • You need dast scanning.
  • You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
  • You also want iast technology.

Choose authentik if

  • You need configurable flows.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
  • You also want protocol support.

Questions people ask

Is Acunetix or authentik better?
Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and authentik at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Acunetix or authentik?
authentik has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Acunetix and Free for authentik.
Does Acunetix or authentik run on more platforms?
Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
Can I use authentik for free?
Yes. authentik has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Acunetix starts at On request.
What is Acunetix best used for?
Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what authentik is typically brought in for.
What can Acunetix do that authentik cannot?
Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security. authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?

Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.

Source
authentik: Is authentik free?

The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.

authentik: authentik or Keycloak?

authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.

authentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?

Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads