Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Endor Labs

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Endor Labs
Cybersecurity
Security and AI agent governance for code and supply chain
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Endor Labs pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Endor Labs actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | Endor Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | Seat-based per contributing developer with volume discounts |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Web, CLI, IDE |
| Founded | Unknown | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Endor Labs
- AI coding agent governance
- SAST scanning
- Secrets detection
- Reachability analysis
- Open source dependency scanning
- Package firewall
- MCP server integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Endor Labs
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Endor Labs
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Endor Labs
Endor Labs
- Securing AI coding agent outputs before deploymentnot authentik
- Reducing SAST false positives with reachability analysisnot authentik
- Managing open source supply chain risknot authentik
- Enforcing security policies in CI/CD pipelinesnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Endor Labs
- Pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- Developer tier lacks UI and historical scan data
- Free tier limited to local scanning only
- Seat-based model may become expensive for large teams
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Endor Labs
Free- DeveloperFree
- Local scanning
- Read-only vulnerability data
- No UI, policies, or scan history
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Endor Labs if
- You need ai coding agent governance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE.
- You also want sast scanning.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Endor Labs better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Endor Labs at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Endor Labs?
- authentik starts at Free and Endor Labs at Free.
- Does authentik or Endor Labs run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Endor Labs runs on Web, CLI, IDE.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Endor Labs is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Endor Labs cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance, SAST scanning, Secrets detection, Reachability analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Endor Labs: What is the difference between Endor Labs Developer and paid tiers?
Developer tier is free and provides local scanning via MCP server with read-only vulnerability access and no UI. Paid tiers (Core and Pro) add team features like policy enforcement, enterprise integrations, reporting, and scan history.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Endor Labs: How does Endor Labs define seats for pricing?
Seats are calculated per contributing developer (those with commits in monitored repositories within the last 90 days). Volume discounts apply as team size grows.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Endor Labs: Does Endor Labs support on-premises deployment?
The platform is cloud-based SaaS by default. Enterprise customers should contact sales to discuss custom deployment options.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Bitdefender Total Security
- authentik vs Norton 360
- authentik vs LastPass
- authentik vs Snyk
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Brave Browser
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- authentik vs Kaspersky Total Security
- authentik vs Mullvad VPN
- authentik vs OneTrust
- authentik vs Private Internet Access
- authentik vs Proton Mail
- authentik vs Tuta
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs Doppler
- authentik vs Frontegg
- Endor Labs vs 1Password
- Endor Labs vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Endor Labs vs Norton 360
- Endor Labs vs LastPass
- Endor Labs vs Snyk
- Endor Labs vs Bitwarden
- Endor Labs vs Brave Browser
- Endor Labs vs Clerk
- Endor Labs vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Endor Labs vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Endor Labs vs Mullvad VPN
- Endor Labs vs OneTrust
- Endor Labs vs Private Internet Access
- Endor Labs vs Proton Mail
- Endor Labs vs Tuta
- Endor Labs vs Akeyless
- Endor Labs vs Doppler
- Endor Labs vs Frontegg
