Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Speakeasy

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Speakeasy
Cybersecurity
AI control plane for governing enterprise agents, MCP servers, and skills
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Chainguard has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Speakeasy no self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Speakeasy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Speakeasy |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | web, api |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Speakeasy
- AI tool catalog
- Per-agent identity
- Role-based access control
- Real-time policy enforcement
- Audit logging
- MDM and SSO integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Speakeasy
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Speakeasy
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Speakeasy
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Speakeasy
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Speakeasy
Speakeasy
- Governing AI agents at enterprise scalenot Chainguard
- Preventing shadow AI tool sprawlnot Chainguard
- Enforcing least-privilege access for agentsnot Chainguard
- Auditing AI tool call activity for compliancenot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Speakeasy
- No self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- The product pivoted away from its original SDK-generation offering, so past documentation and customers built on that use case are no longer the focus.
- Requires integration with an existing identity provider such as Okta or Entra ID to be useful, so it is not a standalone solution.
- No published free tier or trial pricing was found.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Speakeasy
On request- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom pricing
- AI tool catalog and visibility
- Per-agent identity and access control
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Speakeasy if
- You need ai tool catalog.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want per-agent identity.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Speakeasy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Speakeasy at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Speakeasy?
- Chainguard has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Chainguard and On request for Speakeasy.
- Does Chainguard or Speakeasy run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Speakeasy runs on web, api.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Yes. Chainguard has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Speakeasy starts at On request.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Speakeasy is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Speakeasy cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog, Per-agent identity, Role-based access control, Real-time policy enforcement.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceSpeakeasy: How much does Speakeasy cost?
Speakeasy offers an Enterprise tier with features including SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. No specific pricing is published; interested parties contact the company to discuss pricing.
SourceChainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceSpeakeasy: What is included in Speakeasy's Enterprise plan?
The Enterprise plan includes SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. Customers contact Speakeasy to discuss their specific pricing for these features.
SourceChainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Akeyless
- Chainguard vs Frontegg
- Chainguard vs Netwrix
- Chainguard vs Securiti
- Chainguard vs Qualys VMDR
- Chainguard vs Transcend
- Chainguard vs Omada Identity
- Chainguard vs Saviynt
- Chainguard vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Chainguard vs TunnelBear
- Chainguard vs Vanta
- Chainguard vs Acunetix
- Chainguard vs Aikido
- Speakeasy vs Snyk
- Speakeasy vs Trivy
- Speakeasy vs Doppler
- Speakeasy vs Infisical
- Speakeasy vs Grype
- Speakeasy vs Arnica
- Speakeasy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Speakeasy vs Bitwarden
- Speakeasy vs Semgrep
- Speakeasy vs Authelia
- Speakeasy vs Endor Labs
- Speakeasy vs Tenable
- Speakeasy vs Hanwha Vision
- Speakeasy vs Idira
- Speakeasy vs IVPN
- Speakeasy vs Logto
- Speakeasy vs Malwarebytes
- Speakeasy vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Speakeasy vs Akeyless
- Speakeasy vs Frontegg
- Speakeasy vs Netwrix
- Speakeasy vs Securiti
- Speakeasy vs Qualys VMDR
- Speakeasy vs Transcend
- Speakeasy vs Omada Identity
- Speakeasy vs Saviynt
- Speakeasy vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Speakeasy vs TunnelBear
- Speakeasy vs Vanta
- Speakeasy vs Acunetix
- Speakeasy vs Aikido
